How cited: Potomac Passengers Association v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Corporation · Go Syfert

Potomac Passengers Association v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Corporation (1975)

green · 95 citation events across 25 courts. Showing the 14 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197520002026
Rule Authority · SCOTUS · 2 citations in this opinion
C. 359, 363, n. 22, 520 F. 2d 91, 95, n. 22 (1975).
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Co., 520 F.2d 91, 95 (D.C.Cir.1975); Harcon Barge Co. Inc. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., 746 F.2d 278 , 283 n. 2 (5th Cir.1984)).
green Pallazola v. Rucker (1986)
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
Cf. Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 218 , 94 S.Ct. 2253, 2259 , 41 L.Ed.2d 20 (1974) ("We think it inadvisable ... to reach out ... to pass on important questions of statutory construction when simpler, and more settled, grounds are available for deciding the case at hand."); Potomac Passengers Ass’n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway, 520 F.2d 91, 97 (D.C.Cir.1975) ("A litigant cannot invoke federal jurisdiction merely to determine by which rationale he loses.”) (footnot…
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
Cf. Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 218 , 94 S.Ct. 2253, 2259 , 41 L.Ed.2d 20 (1974) ("We think it inadvisable ... to reach out ... to pass on important questions of statutory construction when simpler, and more settled, grounds are available for deciding the case at hand."); Potomac Passengers Ass'n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway, 520 F.2d 91, 97 (D.C.Cir.1975) ("A litigant cannot invoke federal jurisdiction merely to determine by which rationale he loses.") (footnot…
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir.
Co., 520 F.2d 91, 97 (D.C.Cir.1975).
Rule Authority · Pa. Commw. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
“When an appellate court makes so fundamental an error as that of sustaining federal subject matter jurisdiction where none exists, we think the court must exercise its discretion to correct that mistake.” Id. at 95, n. 22 .
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Co., 520 F.2d 91, 97 (D.C.Cir.1975); Trujillo v. Schweiker, 558 F.Supp. 1058, 1061 (D.Col.1983).
green Kurtz v. Baker (1986)
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
Insurance Corporation of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites, 456 U.S. 694, 702 , 102 S.Ct. 2099, 2104 , 72 L.Ed.2d 492 (1982); Safir v. Dole, 718 F.2d 475, 481 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 2389 , 81 L.Ed.2d 347 (1984); Potomac Passengers Assn v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., 520 F.2d 91, 95 (D.C.Cir.1975).
Rule Authority · D.R.I. · signal: cf.
Cf. Potomac Passengers Ass’n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway, 520 F.2d 91, 97 (D.C.Cir.1975).
Rule Authority · W.D. Tex.
Co., 171 U.S.App.D.C. 359, 363 , 520 F.2d 91, 95 (1975) (emphasis supplied).
emphasis supplied
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Potomac Passengers Association v. Chesapeake & O.R.R., 520 F.2d 91 (D.C.Cir.1975).
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See Potomac Passengers Association v. C & O Railway, 520 F.2d 91 , 95 & n. 22 (D.C.Cir.1975).
Cited · D.C. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
District of Columbia v. Trustees of Amherst College, 499 A.2d 918, 920 (D.C.1985); see Potomac Passengers Ass’n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry., 171 U.S.App.D.C. 359 , 363 & n. 22, 520 F.2d 91 , 95 & n. 22 (1975). .
Cited · D. Del. · signal: see
See, Potomac Passengers Ass’n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., 171 U.S. App.D.C. 359, 520 F.2d 91, 96-97 (1975).