Cluster 330515 (1975)
green
· 173 citation events
across 47 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197520002026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Namoff v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith (1987)
See Zimmerman v. Bell, 800 F.2d 386, 389 (4th Cir. 1986); Green v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 541 F.2d 1335 , 1340 n. 10 (9th Cir. 1976); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1975), cert, denied sub nom.
green
In Re Dennis Greenman Securities Litigation (1987)
See Zimmerman v. Bell, 800 F.2d 386, 389 (4th Cir.1986); Green v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 541 F.2d 1335 , 1340 n. 10 (9th Cir.1976); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied sub nom.
Dist. of Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir. 1975).
green
Anthony Henson v. Usdc-Caoak (2017)
Dist. of Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir. 1975).
green
Robin Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc. (2001)
P. 23(b)(1)(B). 87 Class actions are permitted under Rule 23(b)(1)(B) if separate actions "inescapably will alter the substance of the rights of others having similar claims." McDonnell , 523 F.2d at 1086.
green
Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc. (2001)
Class actions are permitted under Rule 23(b)(1)(B) if separate actions “inescapably will alter the substance of the rights of others having similar claims.” McDonnell, 523 F.2d at 1086.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court, 523 F.2d 1083, 1085-87 (9th Cir.1975), merely held that certification was precluded under subdivisions (b)(1) and (b)(2) of Rule 23 for individual tort claimants seeking compensatory damages.
green
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2039, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3461, Pens. Plan Guide P 23918x Inter-Modal Rail Employ… (1996)
Because the definition of "governmental plan" in § 1003(b) explicitly includes "any plan to which the Railroad Retirement Act of 1935 or 1937" applies, § 1003(b) necessarily contemplates that Railroad Retirement Act plans are "employee benefit plan[s]" within the coverage of the exemption 8 The absence of litigation may help explain the failure of Congress to amend § 1002(32) of ERISA during the twenty years since it was adopted 9 McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States Dis…
green
In Re Bendectin Products Liability Litigation (1984)
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); In re “Agent Orange” Product Liability Litigation, 100 F.R.D. 718, 724-25 (E.D.N.Y.1983), petition for mandamus denied sub nom.
green
In Re Northern District of California, Dalkon Shield Iud Products Liability Litigation. (1982)
Ct., C.D. of Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976), quoting LaMar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, 489 F.2d 461, 467 (9th Cir. 1973).
green
Abed v. A. H. Robins Co. (1982)
Ct., C.D. of Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976), quoting LaMar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, 489 F.2d 461, 467 (9th Cir. 1973).
green
Pruitt v. Allied Chemical Corp. (1980)
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court, supra at 1086. (“At worst, individual actions would leave unnamed members of the class with the complexity and expense as if no prior actions had been brought.”) RULE 23(b)(2) Plaintiffs also seek, in the alternative, to proceed on behalf of their proposed class under subsection (b)(2) of Rule 23.
green
Taylor v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2007)
Title Agency, Inc., 241 F.R.D. 268, 282 (N.D.Ohio 2006); McDonnell-Douglas, 523 F.2d at 1086 (“In this case, a judgment that defendants were liable to one plaintiff would not require action inconsistent with a judgment that they were not liable to another plaintiff.
“In this case, a judgment that defendants were liable to one plaintiff would not require action inconsistent with a judgment that they were not liable to another plaintiff. By paying the first judgment, defendants could act consistently with both judgments.”
green
In re Syncor Erisa Litigation (2005)
McDonnell Douglas, 523 F.2d at 1086.
green
In re Seagate Technologies Securities Litigation (1987)
McDonnell’s concern that the “detailed provisions of (b)(3)” not be “render[ed] superfluous” is better viewed as equally applicable to both plaintiff and defendant classes. 523 F.2d at 1086.
green
McBirney v. Autrey (1985)
McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 523 F.2d at 1086; Walker, 341 F.Supp. at 1131 ; In re Itel, 89 F.R.D. at 125 ; In re Victor Technologies Securities Litigation, 102 F.R.D. 53, 63-64 (N.D.Cal.1984); Hudson v. Capital Management International, Inc., 565 F.Supp. 615, 633 (N.D.Cal.1983).
green
Salazar v. Driver Provider Phoenix LLC (2023)
Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1975). 3 Plaintiffs refute Defendants’ characterization that the nature of their claim’s risk is 4 damages rather than the “numerous daily tasks Defendants require Drivers to perform that 5 are neither tracked nor compensated.” (Doc. 379 at 2.) But Plaintiffs do not refute the 6 Ninth Circuit’s precedent establishing that Rule 23(b)(1)(A) certification is inappropriate 7 for classes seeking damages.
green
Salazar v. Driver Provider Phoenix LLC (2023)
Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1975). 3 Plaintiffs refute Defendants’ characterization that the nature of their claim’s risk is 4 damages rather than the “numerous daily tasks Defendants require Drivers to perform that 5 are neither tracked nor compensated.” (Doc. 379 at 2.) But Plaintiffs do not refute the 6 Ninth Circuit’s precedent establishing that Rule 23(b)(1)(A) certification is inappropriate 7 for classes seeking damages.
green
Borgese v. Baby Brezza Enterprises LLC (2021)
Dist. of Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1975) (explaining that “subdivision (b)(1)(A) was not intended to permit class actions simply when separate actions would raise the same question of law,” and instead must be limited to instances when separate actions would risk incompatible standards of “required” conduct).
explaining that “subdivision (b)(1)(A) was not intended to permit class actions simply when separate actions would raise the same question of law,” and instead must be limited to instances when separate actions would risk incompatible standards of “required” conduct
green
Escalante v. California Physicians' Service (2015)
Dist. of California, 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1975).
green
In re: Death Row Records, Inc. (2012)
Ct. of Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1975).
green
Critchfield Physical Therapy v. Taranto Group, Inc. (2011)
D. of Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1975), where that court held: “We cannot read subdivision (b)(1)(A) so broadly that subdivision (b)(3) applies only to class actions already maintainable under subdivision (b)(1)(A).” The court then further held: “This is a far ciy from the per se bar against 23(b)(1)(A) money damages cases that Defendants propose. . . .
Of California, 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1975).
green
Chauvin v. Chevron Oronite Co., LLC (2009)
Dist., 523 F.2d 1083, 1085 (9th Cir.1975); See In re Bendectin Products Liability Litigation, 749 F.2d 300, 305 (6th Cir.1984).
green
In re First American Corp. Erisa Litigation (2009)
Class actions are permitted under Rule 23(b)(1)(B) if separate actions “inescapably will alter the substance of the rights of others having similar claims.” McDonnell, 523 F.2d at 1086.
green
In re First American Corp. Erisa Litigation (2009)
Class actions are permitted under Rule 23(b)(1)(B) if separate actions “inescapably will alter the substance of the rights of others having similar claims.” McDonnell, 523 F.2d at 1086.
green
Cunningham Charter Corp. v. Learjet, Inc. (2009)
Dist. of Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1975)).
green
Jones v. NovaStar Financial, Inc. (2009)
Dist., 523 F.2d 1083,1086 (9th Cir.1975), the argument: inserts a requirement into 23(b)(1)(A) that is not present.
green
Kamar v. Radio Shack Corp. (2008)
Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied sub nom., Flanagan v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976)).
green
Blackwell v. Skywest Airlines, Inc. (2007)
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 523 F.2d at 1086.
green
Maddock v. KB Homes, Inc. (2007)
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 523 F.2d at 1086.
green
Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc. (2007)
Court, 523 F.2d 1083 , 1087 (9th Cir. 1975) (“[T]he declaratory relief sought by plaintiffs adds nothing to their claim for damages.”); see Eriks, 118 Wn.2d at 466-67 .
“[T]he declaratory relief sought by plaintiffs adds nothing to their claim for damages.”
green
Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc. (2007)
Court, 523 F.2d 1083 1087 (9th Cir.1975) ("[T]he declaratory relief sought by plaintiffs adds nothing to their claim for damages.").
green
Sepulveda v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2006)
Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1975)).
green
Everest v. Leviton Manufacturing Company (2006)
Of Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1975).
green
Jones v. American General Life & Accident Insurance (2002)
Inc., 86 F.R.D. 188, 192 (S.D.Tex.1980); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court, 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1975); Flanagan v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); In re Itel, 89 F.R.D. at 125 ); see also 5 JAMES WM.
green
Clarke v. Advanced Private Networks, Inc. (1997)
Ct., C.D. of Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (subdivision (b)(1)(B) is concerned only with the rights of unnamed class members, not with the rights of parties opposing the class). .
green
Leer v. Washington Education Ass'n (1997)
Dist. of Calif., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976), where the Ninth Circuit held that Rule 23(b)(1)(A) is not satisfied where there is simply a risk that different plaintiffs would suffer inconsistent adjudications: “A quite different situation is presented here as the very same plaintiff would be suffering inconsistent adjudications on the same issue against the same defendant, rather than different plaint…
green
Hum v. Dericks (1995)
Ct., C.D. of Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976), (quoting LaMar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, 489 F.2d 461, 467 (9th Cir.1973)) (emphasis added).
green
Mateo v. M/S KISO (1991)
Adopting an extremely conservative view, the Ninth Circuit has held that certification under Rule 23(b)(1) is only appropriate where either: (1) rulings in separate actions would subject defendant to incompatible judgments requiring inconsistent conduct to comply with the judgment; or (2) a ruling in the first of a series of separate actions will “inescapably alter the substance of the rights of others having similar claims.” McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. U.S. District Court, C…
green
Casper v. Cunard Line, Ltd. (1983)
McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. U.S. District Court, Central District of California, 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied sub nom.
green
In re Itel Securities Litigation (1981)
Neither the stare decisis consequences of an individual action nor the possibility of false reliance upon the improper initiation of a class action can supply either the practical disposition of the rights of the class, or the substantial impairment of those rights, at least one of which is required by Rule 23(b)(1)(B).” Id.; and see Green v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 541 F.2d 1335, 1340 (9th Cir. 1976); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. U. S. District Court, supra, 523 F.2d at 1…
green
In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation" (1980)
McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. United States District Court, Central District of California, 523 F.2d 1083,1086 (CA9 1975), cert. denied sub nom., Flanagan v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
green
Payton v. Abbott Labs (1979)
D. of Cal., 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied sub nom.
green
Alvarado Morales v. Digital Equipment Corp. (1987)
See, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court, 523 F.2d 1083, 1085 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Mertens v. Abbott Laboratories, 99 F.R.D. 38, 43 (D.N.H.1983); In re Three Mile Island Litigation, 87 F.R.D. 433 (M.D.Pa.1980); Marchesi v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 500, 501 (E.D.N.Y.1975); Wright v. McMann, 321 *1186 F.Supp. 127, 137 (N.D.N.Y.1970), aff'd in part and reversed in part on other grounds, …
green
Employers Insurance v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1986)
See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. U.S. District Court, 523 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Abramovitz v. Ahern, 97 F.R.D. at 215 and cases therein cited.
green
Bucci v. Cunard Line Ltd. (1985)
See McDonnel Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court, 523 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir. 1975); 2 cert. denied 425 U.S. 911 (1976); Causey v. Pan American World Airways, 66 F.D.R. 392 (E.D., Va. 1975); Hobbs v. Northeast Airlines, Inc. 50 F.R.D. 76 (E.D., Pa. 1970); In Re Federal Skywalk Cases, 680 F.2d 1175 (8th Cir. 1982).
green
Weinberger v. Jackson (1984)
See In re Victor Technologies Securities Litigation, 102 F.R.D. 53 (N.D.Cal.1984), following McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court, 523 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir.1975) cert. denied, 425 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 1506 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
green
In re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation" (1983)
See McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. United States District Court, Central District of California, 523 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied sub nom.
green
Wilcox Development Co. v. First Interstate Bank (1983)
Accord, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court, Central District of California, 523 F.2d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir.1975).