Cluster 331112 (1975)

green · 58 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 30 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 30

Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

197520002026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green In Re: Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb Litigation Mabel Brown George Burrell Wallace D. Cummins Sylvan C. Cohen K. Lo… (2000)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir. · signal: cf. · 2 citations in this opinion

Cf. ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir. 1975) (instructing the district court to consider whether and how the prevailing party's costs should be apportioned between the two non-prevailing parties, given the non- prevailing parties' different responsibilities in forcing the prevailing party to incur costs).

instructing the district court to consider whether and how the prevailing party's costs should be apportioned between the two non-prevailing parties, given the non- prevailing parties' different responsibilities in forcing the prevailing party to incur costs

green In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation (2000)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir. · signal: cf. · 2 citations in this opinion

Cf. ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir.1975) (instructing the district court to consider whether and how the prevailing party’s costs should be apportioned between the two non-prevailing parties, given the non-prevailing parties’ different responsibilities in forcing the prevailing party to incur costs).

green Sun Ship, Inc. v. Lehman (1981)

Rule Authority · D.C. Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

“On remand, the trial court should consider whether if [the victor] is to be allowed costs, part of the burden should [also] be borne by [the unsuccessful intervenor-plaintiff].” ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 665 (3rd Cir. 1975). . 379 U.S. 227 , 85 S.Ct. 411 , 13 L.Ed.2d 248 (1964).

green Reger v. THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION, INC. (2010)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

ADM *289 Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir.1975) (quoting Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 176 F.2d 1, 11 (7th Cir.1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 948 , 70 S.Ct. 486 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950)).

green Friedman v. Ganassi (1988)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh, 538 F.2d 991, 999 (3d Cir.1976); ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 664-65 (3d Cir.1975).

green Friedman v. Ganassi (1988)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh, 538 F.2d 991, 999 (3d Cir.1976); ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 664-65 (3d Cir.1975).

green P. Mastrippolito And Sons, Inc. v. Joseph (1982)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

In Croker v. Boeing Co., 662 F.2d 975, 988 (3d Cir.1981) (en banc) we held that Title VII does not "carve[ ] out an exception to th[e] rule" that "[c]osts, unlike attorney's fees, are awarded to a prevailing party as a matter of course, unless the district court directs otherwise." In Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh, 538 F.2d 991, 999 (3d Cir.1976) this court held that "[t]he law is clear that a district court may not deny costs to the prevailing party unless it supports …

green P. Mastrippolito & Sons, Inc. v. Joseph (1982)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

In Croker v. Boeing Co., 662 F.2d 975, 988 (3d Cir.1981) (en banc) we held that Title VII does not “carve[] out an exception to th[e] rule” that “[c]osts, unlike attorney’s fees, are awarded to a prevailing party as a matter of course, unless the district court directs otherwise.” In Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh, 538 F.2d 991, 999 (3d Cir.1976) this court held that “[t]he law is clear that a district court may not deny costs to the prevailing party unless it supports t…

green Pearlstine, Jules and Pearlstine, Eileen, His Wife v. The United States of America and United States Postal S… (1981)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

In ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 664-65 (3d Cir. 1975), we stated that when a district court *199 determines that a prevailing litigant is not entitled to an award of costs, an explanation must be entered on the record.

green Delaney v. Capone (1981)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

In ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 664-65 (3d Cir. 1975), we said that when the district court determines that a prevailing party is not entitled to costs, there should be an explanation entered on the record.

green Delaney v. Capone (1981)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

green True Temper Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Cf&i Steel Corporation, and Cross-Appellant (1979)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

Poped Brothers, Inc. v. Schick Electric, Inc., 516 F.2d 772, 775 (7th Cir.); see Walters v. Roadway Express, Inc., 557 F.2d 521 , 526 *510 (5th Cir.); ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 664-65 (3d Cir.); Pickering v. Holman, 459 F.2d 403, 408 (9th Cir.); Lewis v. Pennington, 400 F.2d 806, 819 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 960 , 90 S.Ct. 2177 , 26 L.Ed.2d 546 .

green Samuel v. University Of Pittsburgh (1976)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 664-665 (3d Cir. 1975).

green Watts v. University of Delaware (1979)

Rule Authority · D. Del. · 2 citations in this opinion

ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 664 (C.A.3, 1975).

green Mark Vitalis v. Sun Constructors, Inc. (2024)

Rule Authority · D.V.I.

Reger v. The Nemours Found., Inc., 599 F.3d 285, 288-89 (3d Cir. 2010) (citing ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir. 1975).

green LANGLEY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. (2021)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

The reasons underlying the denial or reduction of a prevailing party’s award of costs must be articulated “because the denial of such costs is akin to a penalty.” Id. (first citing In re Paoli, 221 F.3d at 468; and then citing ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir. 1975)).

green Cordance Corp v. Amazon.com, Inc. (2012)

Rule Authority · D. Del.

ADM Corp., 525 F.2d at 665. .

green Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen (1994)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 664-65 (3d Cir.1975).

green Braxton v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (1993)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

See Croker v. Boeing Co. (Vertol Div.), 662 F.2d 975 (3d Cir.1981) (courts have discretion in awarding costs) (citing Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co., 379 U.S. 227, 235 , 85 S.Ct. 411, 416 , 13 L.Ed.2d 248 (1964)); Wright, Miller & Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 2d § 2668 (1983). “[Wjhen a district court finds that the prevailing party is not entitled to its costs, [however,] it should support that determination with an explanation.” ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster …

green Student Public Interest Research Group v. Monsanto Co. (1989)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

See, e.g., Friends of the Earth v. Eastman Kodak Co., 834 F.2d 295, 298 (2d Cir.1987) (affirming district court’s downward adjustment of lodestar on basis that “evidence consisted of defendant’s own DMRs, which have been held sufficient to entitle a plaintiff to summary judgment.”); ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir.1975) (trial court has right to deny costs “where the prevailing party has unduly extended or complicated resolution of the iss…

green Young v. Aviva Gelato, Inc. (In Re Aviva Gelato, Inc.) (1988)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir. BAP

ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir.1975).

green Brown v. Fairleigh Dickinson University (1983)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

Samuels v. University of Pittsburgh, 538 F.2d 991 , 999 (3d Cir.1976) (citing ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 664-65 (3d Cir.1975)).

green Compro-Frink Co. v. Valk Manufacturing Co. (1982)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

Delaney, supra at 58 ; ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 664-65 (3d Cir. 1975).

green General Battery Corp. v. Gould, Inc. (1982)

Rule Authority · D. Del.

ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 664 (3d Cir. 1975).

green Peterson v. Crown Financial Corp. (1980)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

And plaintiff has not “unduly extended or complicated resolution of the issues.” ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir. 1975).

green National Information Services, Inc., an Oregon Corporation v. Trw, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and Credit Bure… (1995)

Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see

See Smith, 47 F.3d at 99-100 , (citing ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir.1975), and Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 176 F.2d 1, 11 (7th Cir.1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 948 , 70 S.Ct. 486 , 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950)).

green National Information Services, Inc. v. TRW, Inc. (1995)

Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see

green Roberts v. Lemos (1981)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See ADM Corp. v. Speedmas-ter Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662 (3d Cir. 1975).

green Captain Shelby C. Roberts v. S. S. Kyriakoula D. Lemos and Capetandiamentis Cia Mar S.A., a Greek Corporation… (1981)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662 (3d Cir. 1975). 44 Accordingly, rather than direct the district court to award the Captain's travel costs, I would reverse and remand to the district court so that it may reconsider its denial of these travel costs in light of the foregoing standard. 1 But see Farmer, supra, 379 U.S. at 234 , 85 S.Ct. at 416 , in which the Supreme Court did not distinguish foreign from domestic travel expenses 2 The Second Circuit's …

green Teel v. Young (1978)

Cited · Me. · signal: see

See ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp., 525 F.2d 662, 665 (3rd Cir. 1975); Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 176 F.2d 1, 11 (7th Cir. 1949), Cf. Lewis v. Pennington, 400 F.2d 806, 819 (6th Cir. 1968) (prevailing party is prima facie entitled to costs and it is incumbent upon unsuccessful party to overcome presumption).