Cluster 331922 (1975)
green
· 190 citation events
across 43 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197520002026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Southland Corp. v. Keating (1984)
E. g., Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S. A. v. Nereus Shipping, S. A., 527 F. 2d 966, 975 (CA2 1975), cert. denied, 426 U. S. 936 (1976); In re Czarnikow-Rionda Co., 512 F. Supp. 1308, 1309 (SDNY 1981).
In Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 973 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976), we ruled that a clause in a charter party which provided for arbitration of "any and all differences and disputes of whatsoever nature arising out of this Charter" was binding on parties to a bill of lading which incorporated the charter party by reference.
green
New England Energy Inc. v. Keystone Shipping Company, Keystone Shipping Company v. New England Energy Inc. (1988)
See, e.g., Compania Espanola de Petroleos, 527 F.2d at 969 ("Any and all differences and disputes of whatsoever nature arising out of this Charter shall be put to arbitration....").
"Any and all differences and disputes of whatsoever nature arising out of this Charter shall be put to arbitration...."
green
Limbach Company v. Gevyn Construction Corporation (1976)
The court in Compañía Española was faced with “[a] mass of confusion and procedural effluvia,” 527 F.2d at 968, that makes it difficult to determine exactly what kind of an order was appealed, but the opinion indicates that the court was moved to consider the order not because it mandated the procedural step of consolidation, but because it “obligated the parties to arbitrate, thereby affecting their substantive rights.” Id. at 973.
Moreover, we think the liberal purposes of the Federal Arbitration Act clearly require that this act be interpreted so as to permit and even to encourage the consolidation of arbitration proceedings in proper cases, such as the one before us. 16 527 F.2d at 975 (footnote omitted).
footnote omitted
green
Government of the United Kingdom v. Boeing Co. (1993)
Moreover, we think the liberal purposes of the Federal Arbitration Act clearly require that this act be interpreted so as to permit and even to encourage the consolidation of arbitration proceedings in proper cases, such as the one before us. 527 F.2d at 975 (footnote omitted).
footnote omitted
Mineracao Da Trindade-Samitri v. Utah Int’l, Inc., 745 F.2d 190 , 192, 195-96 (2d Cir.1984) (arbitration clauses referred to “this Agreement” or “this Contract”); Nereus Shipping, 527 F.2d at 969 (arbitration clause referred to “this Charter”).
arbitration clause referred to “this Charter”
green
Leroy Baesler v. Continental Grain Company (1990)
Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 975 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976). 10 The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has held that a district court may order consolidation of arbitration proceedings if a provision of state arbitration law specifically authorizes such action.
green
Baesler v. Continental Grain Co. (1990)
Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 975 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976).
green
Maxum Foundations, Inc. v. Salus Corporation, & Third Party and United Pacific Insurance Co. v. 8201 Corporat… (1987)
The Second Circuit apparently still adheres to the holding of Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 975 (2d Cir.1975), where the court found “more than ample support in the case law for the propriety of a court’s consolidation of arbitrations under the federal [arbitration] statute.” See, for example, Sociedad Anonima de Navegacion Petrolera v. Cia. de Petroleos de Chile, 634 F.Supp. 805 (S.D.N.Y.1986); but see Ore & Chemical Corp. v. S…
green
United States v. John Katsougrakis, John Hiotis (1983)
It is well settled that the filing of a timely and effective notice of appeal from a final judgment divests the court of jurisdiction to amend or otherwise reconsider that judgment. 7 See Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 972-73 (2d Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976); 9 J.
green
Coastal States Gas Corp. v. Atlantic Tankers, Ltd. (1976)
Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 972 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976).
green
In Re the Arbitrations Between Benship International, Inc. & Phosphate Chemicals Export Ass'n (1991)
Moreover, we think the liberal purposes of the Federal Arbitration Act clearly require that this act be interpreted so as to permit and even to encourage the consolidation of arbitration proceedings in proper cases.... *89 Nereus, supra, 527 F.2d at 975 (citations and footnote omitted). 2 In deciding whether to order the consolidation of arbitrations, courts in this Circuit have considered several factors, most important of which are the existence of common questions of law …
citations and footnote omitted
We are aided in our construction of the language here by prior decisions which make clear that where an arbitration clause is applicable by its own terms to all disputes and is not limited to those arising between the [contract signatories], the agreement to arbitrate binds “not only the original parties, but also all those who subsequently consent to be bound by [the terms of the contract].” Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 973 (2…
green
Matter of Coastal Shipping and Southern Petroleum (1993)
Although the Arbitration Act is interpreted liberally, see Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A. 527 F.2d 966, 975 (2d Cir.1974), and doubts are resolved in favor of arbitration, see, e.g., United States Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 583 , 80 S.Ct. 1347, 1353 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 (1960); David L.
green
Ore & Chemical Corp. v. Stinnes Interoil, Inc. (1985)
Nereus, supra, 527 F.2d at 975; accord Robinson v. Warner, 370 F.Supp. 828, 829-31 (D.R.I.1974).
Other nonsignatories which may be bound by an arbitration agreement include insurance subrogees, see Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Co. v. Borden Co., 268 F.Supp. 303, 313 (S.D.N.Y.1967), contract assignees, see Fisser v. International Bank, supra, 282 F.2d at 233, n. 6 , and guarantors, see Compania Espanola de Petroleos v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 973-74 (2d Cir. 1975).
Co. v. Haskell Co., 742 F.2d 274, 276 (6th Cir.1984) (per curiam); Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 973-74 (2d Cir.1975), abrogated on other grounds by, Gov’t of United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland v. Boeing Co., 998 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.1993); see also Nat’l Am.
green
City of New York v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp. (2006)
See, e.g., New York State NOW, 886 F.2d at 1350 (“We have held that the filing of an interlocutory appeal only divests the district court of jurisdiction respecting the questions raised and decided in the order on appeal.”); Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A v. Nereus Shipping, S.A, 527 F.2d 966, 973 (2d Cir.1975) (“The filing of a notice of appeal from the December 18, 1974 order only divested the district court of jurisdiction with respect to questions raised and decided…
green
Randolph v. Green Tree Financial Corp. (1998)
Compania Espanola de Petroleos S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 975 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976)(holding that a district court could order consolidated arbitration pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 42(a) and 81(a)(3)).
green
Red Ball Interior Demolition Corp. v. Palmadessa (1996)
The filing of a notice of appeal “only divest[s] the district court of jurisdiction respecting the questions raised and decided in the order appealed from.” New York State National Org. for Women v. Terry, 886 F.2d 1339 , 1350 (2d Cir.1989), citing Compania Espano-la de Petroleos, S.A v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 972-73 (2d Cir.1975) (overruled on other grounds by Government of United Kingdom v. Boeing Co., 998 F.2d 68 , 71 (2d Cir.1993)).
green
Elmarina, Inc. v. Comexas, N.V. (1988)
Nevertheless, the Second Circuit has not reversed its holding in Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 974 (2d Cir.1975), that a district court does have the power to consolidate arbitrations in the appropriate circumstances.
green
Builders Fed.(Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Turner Const. (1987)
See, e.g., Fisser v. International Bank, 282 F.2d 231 (2d Cir.1960) (alter ego); Compania Espanola de Petroleos S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 973-74 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976) (written contract of guaranty).
green
In Re the Arbitration Between Transportacion Maritima Mexicana, S.A. & Companhia De Navegacao Lloyd Brasileiro (1983)
That observation is made in the seminal case in the Second Circuit on the subject, Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 975 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976).
See U.S. v. Crescent Amusement Co., 323 U.S. 173, 177 , 65 S.Ct. 254, 256 , 89 L.Ed. 160 (1944); Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S. A. v. Nereus Shipping, S. A., 527 F.2d 966, 972 (2d Cir. 1975).
green
In Re J. M. Fields, Inc. (1981)
See U. S. v. Crescent Amusement Co., 323 U.S. 173, 177 , 65 S.Ct. 254, 256 , 89 L.Ed. 160 (1944); Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S. A. v. Nereus Shipping, S. A., 527 F.2d 966, 972 (2d Cir. 1975).
Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 970 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. den., 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 . 2 .
green
Griffin v. Semperit of America, Inc. (1976)
Compania Española de Petroleos S.A. v. Nereus Shipping S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 974 (2d Cir. 1975) (“. . . duty to arbitrate was indeed one of the rights and obligations which Cepsa, as guarantor, agreed to assume.”); Wells Fargo Bank v. London S.-S. Owner’s Mut.
“. . . duty to arbitrate was indeed one of the rights and obligations which Cepsa, as guarantor, agreed to assume.”
Compañía Española De Petróleos, S. A. v. Nereus Shipping S. A., 527 F.2d 966, at 973 (2d Cir. 1975).
See Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 973-74 (2d Cir. 1975); cf. Connecticut Gen.
See Companía Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 973-74 (2d Cir.1975); cf. Connecticut Gen.
See Companía Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966 , 972-73 (2d Cir.1975) (settled rule depriving district court of jurisdiction during appeal inapplicable where two independent proceedings involved), cert, denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976); 9 Moore’s Federal Practice 11203.11 at 3-54 (2d ed. 1989).
green
Pro Choice Coalition v. Terry (1989)
See Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966 , 972-73 (2d Cir.1975) (settled rule depriving district court of jurisdiction during appeal inapplicable where two independent proceedings involved), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976); 9 Moore's Federal Practice p 203.11 at 3-54 (2d ed. 1989). 36 The rule is that if an appeal is taken from a judgment determining the entire action, the district court's hands are ti…
green
Del E. Webb Construction, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellee v. Richardson Hospital Authority, Defendant-Cross… (1987)
See Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 975 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976). 27 But the Ninth Circuit stated in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Western Seas Shipping Co., 743 F.2d 635, 637 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1061 , 105 S.Ct. 544 , 83 L.Ed.2d 431 (1984), declining to follow Compania, "the only issue properly before this Court is whether Weyerhaeuser, Karlander, and Trans-Pacific are…
See Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 975 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976).
green
International Paper Co. v. Whitson (1979)
See Compania Espanolo de Pet., S.A. v. Nereus Ship., 527 F.2d 966 , 972-73 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976).
green
International Paper Company v. Whitson (1979)
See Compania Espanolo de Pet., S.A. v. Nereus Ship., 527 F.2d 966 , 972-73 (2d Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976).
green
P/R CLIPPER GAS v. PPG Industries, Inc. (1992)
See Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d at 975 (ordering five arbitrators in consolidated proceeding); see also In re Czarnikow-Rionda Co., Inc., 512 F.Supp. at 1309-1310 (fiveman panel ordered although the arbitral agreement provided for three arbitrators); Anteo Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Sidermar, S.p.A., 417 F.Supp. 207, 219 (S.D.N.Y.1976) (same).
ordering five arbitrators in consolidated proceeding
green
PaineWebber, Inc. v. Fowler (1992)
See Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976); Rio Energy Int’l, Inc. v. Hilton Oil Transport, 776 F.Supp. 120 (S.D.N.Y.1991); Kanuth v. Prescott, Ball & Turben, Inc., [1989 Transfer Binder] Fed.Sec.L.Rep.
See Nereus, supra, 527 F.2d at 975-76 .
green
In Re United Pub. Workers, Afscme, Loc. 646 (2010)
Id.; see, e.g., Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966 (2d Cir.1975). [4] HRS § 658A-7 provides: Motion to compel or stay arbitration. (a) On motion of a person showing an agreement to arbitrate and alleging another person's refusal to arbitrate pursuant to the agreement: (1) If the refusing party does not appear or does not oppose the motion, the court shall order the parties to arbitrate; and (2) If the refusing party opposes the motion…
green
In re the Arbitration Between UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS, AFSCME, LOCAL 646 & State, Department of Transportation (2010)
Id.; see, e.g., Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966 (2d Cir.1975). .
green
Satcom Intern. Group v. Orbcomm Intern. Partners (1999)
See also Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 973 (2d Cir.1975) (district may order consolidation unrelated to final order during pendency of the appeal).
green
Borsack v. Chalk & Vermilion Fine Arts, Ltd. (1997)
See Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 970 (2d Cir.1975); American Home Assurance Co. v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co., 356 F.2d 690, 691-92 (2d Cir.1966).
green
Gammaro v. Thorp Consumer Discount Co. (1993)
See Compania Espanola de Petroleos S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 975 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976).
See Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 973 (2d Cir.1975); Import Export Steel Corp. v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co., 351 F.2d 503, 505-06 (2d Cir.1965); Lowry & Co. v. S.S. le Moyne D’Iberville, 253 F.Supp. 396 (S.D.N.Y.1966), appeal dismissed, 372 F.2d 123 (2d Cir.1967); Production Steel Company of Illinois v. S.S.
Hartford Financial Systems, Inc. v. Florida Software Services, Inc., 550 F.Supp. 1079, 1086 (D.Me.1982) (“nonsignatories to a contract containing an arbitration clause may be deemed parties thereto ... for purposes of the Federal Arbitration Act”); see Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 973 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976).
See Campania Española de Pet., S.A v. Nereus Shipping, supra. 5 .
green
State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. Lantz (1983)
See Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966 , 972-73 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 936 , 96 S.Ct. 2650 , 49 L.Ed.2d 387 (1976); 9 J.
See generally Compañía Española de Petróleos, S.A. v. Nereus Shipping, S.A., 527 F.2d 966, 975 (2 Cir. 1975).