How cited: Cluster 331939 · Go Syfert

Cluster 331939 (1975)

green · 65 citation events across 20 courts. Showing the 14 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197520002026
green Marcera v. Chinlund (1979)
Rule Authority · 2d Cir. · 3 citations in this opinion
Accord, Wolfish v. Levi, 573 F.2d 118 , 126 n. 16 (2d Cir.) (recognizing First Amendment basis to right), Cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 76 , 58 L.Ed.2d 107 (1978); Rhem v. Malcolm ("Rhem II"), 527 F.2d 1041, 1043 (2d Cir. 1975). 2 Before the instant litigation, however, the cases have focused on one institution at a time, and our decrees have had a practical impact only on the inmates of the particular facility under consideration in each suit.
green Marcera v. Chinlund (1979)
Rule Authority · 2d Cir. · 3 citations in this opinion
Accord, Wolfish v. Levi, 573 F.2d 118 , 126 n. 16 (2d Cir.) (recognizing First Amendment basis to right), cert, granted, -U.S.-, 99 S.Ct. 76 , 58 L.Ed.2d 107 (1978); Rhem v. Malcolm (“Rhem II”), 527 F.2d 1041, 1043 (2d Cir. 1975).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Rhem v. Malcolm, 527 F.2d 1041, 1043 (2d Cir. 1975).
green McCarthy v. Manson (1982)
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
See Detainees of Brooklyn House of Detention v. Malcolm, 520 F.2d 392 , 399 (2d Cir.1975); Rhem v. Malcolm, 507 F.2d 333, 341 (2d Cir.1974), aff’d, 527 F.2d 1041, 1043-1044 (2d Cir.1975); Wyatt v. Aderholt, 503 F.2d 1305, 1315 (5th Cir.1974); Gates v. Collier, 501 F.2d 1291, 1320 (5th Cir.1974); Pugh v. Locke, 406 F.Supp. 318, 330 (M.D.Ala.1976), cert. denied, sub nom., Newman v. Alabama, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978); Hamilton v. Love, 328 F.Supp. 11
green Marcera v. Chinlund (1981)
Rule Authority · W.D.N.Y.
See Miller v. Carson, 563 F.2d 741, 748-49 (5th Cir. 1977); Rhem v. Malcolm (Rhem II), 527 F.2d 1041, 1043 (2d Cir. 1975). .
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Rhem v. Malcolm, 527 F.2d 1041, 1043-44 (2d Cir. 1975); Detainees of the Brooklyn House of Detention for Men v. Malcolm, 520 F.2d 392, 399 (2d Cir. 1975); Rhem v. Malcolm, 507 F.2d 333 , 341 n.20 (2d Cir. 1974); Gates v. Collier, 501 F.2d 1291, 1319-1320 (5th Cir. 1974); Jackson v. Bishop, 404 F.2d 571 , 580 (9th Cir. 1968); Nadeau v. Helgemoe, 423 F.Supp. 1250, 1264 (D.N.H.1976); Hamilton v. Love, 328 F.Supp. 1182, 1194 (E.D.Ark.1971); Holt v. Sarver, 309 F.Supp. 362, 385 (…
green Rhem v. Malcolm (1977)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Denial of the presumptively innocent detainee’s constitutional rights represents an impermissible price to pay for his retention in custody.” Rhem v. Malcolm, 527 F.2d 1041, 1043-44 (2d Cir. 1975).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
As stated in the first Rhem case, such a visiting system “which denie[d] presumably innocent detainees . . . the right to shake hands with a friend, to kiss a wife, or to fondle a child, [is] inhumane and cruel in fact.” Rhem v. Malcolm, 371 F.Supp. 594, 625-626 (S.D.N.Y.) aff’d 507 F.2d 333 (2d Cir. 1974) (contact visits at the Tombs), Rhem v. Malcolm, 389 F.Supp. 964, 968 (S.D.N.Y.) aff’d, 527 F.2d 1041, 1043 (2d Cir. 1975) (contact visits at MHD on Rikers’ Island). *834 […
contact visits at MHD on Rikers’ Island
green McRedmond v. Wilson (1976)
Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., Rhem v. Malcolm, 371 F.Supp. 594 (S.D.N.Y.), 377 F.Supp. 995 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 507 F.2d 333 (2d Cir. 1974), on remand, 389 F.Supp. 964 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 527 F.2d 1041 , Dkt.
conditions in N.Y.C. detention centers
green Mcredmond v. Wilson (1976)
Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., Rhem v. Malcolm, 371 F.Supp. 594 (S.D.N.Y.), 377 F.Supp. 995 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 507 F.2d 333 (2d Cir. 1974), on remand, 389 F.Supp. 964 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 527 F.2d 1041 , Dkt.
conditions in N.Y.C. detention centers
green Forts v. Malcolm (1977)
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Rhem v. Malcolm, 389 F.Supp. 964, 968, 972 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 527 F.2d 1041 (2d Cir. 1975).
Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see
See generally, Rhem v. Malcolm, 527 F.2d 1041 (2d Cir. 1975).
Cited · E.D. Mich. · signal: see
See Rhem v. Malcolm, supra, 527 F.2d at 1043 . 11.
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Rhem v. Malcolm, 527 F.2d 1041 (2d Cir. 1975); Jackson v. Bishop, 404 F.2d 571, 580 (8th Cir. 1968) (Blackmun, J.); Benjamin v. Malcolm, 75 Civ. 3073 (MEL), at 9-10 (S.D.N.Y.