Grace v. Hendricks (1932)

green · 24 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Yellow 1 Green 5

Treatment trajectory · 1933 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

193319792026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

yellow Bartlett & Sons Co. v. Pan-American Studios, Inc. (1940)

But See · Fla. · signal: but see · 2 citations in this opinion

But see Grace v. Hendricks, 103 Fla. 1158 , 140 So. 790 ; Chisholm v. Chisholm, 98 Fla. 1196 , 125 So. 694 ; and Sawyer v. Gustason, 96 Fla. 6 , 118 So. 57 ; Knight v. Raffel, 104 Fla. 421 , 140 So. 199 , allowing motions to vacate though filed after the time for appeal had expired.

green Chrestensen v. Eurogest, Inc. (2005)

Quote Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

See Singleton v. Greymar Assocs., 882 So.2d 1004 (Fla.2004) (holding "a necessary predicate for a deficiency is an adjudication of foreclosure"); Grace v. Hendricks, 103 Fla. 1158 , 140 So. 790 (1932) ("The order for deficiency judgment is so dependent on, and merely ancillary to, the foreclosure and sale that it would be absurd left standing alone.") (citation omitted).

"The order for deficiency judgment is so dependent on, and merely ancillary to, the foreclosure and sale that it would be absurd left standing alone."

green Sterling Factors v. US Bank Nat. Ass'n (2007)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Corp. v. Stern, 296 So.2d 588, 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Aluminum Irrigation, Inc. v. Empire Capitol Corp., 194 So.2d 922, 923 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); Holiday, 121 So.2d at 678 ; Maule Indus., Inc. v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 91 So.2d 307, 309 (Fla.1956); Grace v. Hendricks, 103 Fla. 1158 , 140 So. 790, 790 (1932); Taylor v. Day, 102 Fla. 1006 , 136 So. 701, 703 (1931); Fasel v. Cox, 99 Fla. 968 , 128 So. 33, 34 (1930). [7] Although it was not argued by the parties, we have consi…

green Bonita Real Estate Partners, LLC v. SLF IV Lending, L.P. (2017)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 548 So.2d 282, 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)); see Grace v. Hendricks, 103 Fla. 1158 , 140 So. 790, 794 (1932) (“The order for deficiency judgment is so dependent on, and merely ancillary to, the foreclosure and sale ...." (quoting City Bank of Portage v. Plank, 141 Wis. 653 , 124 N.W. 1000 (1910))).

“The order for deficiency judgment is so dependent on, and merely ancillary to, the foreclosure and sale ...." (quoting City Bank of Portage v. Plank, 141 Wis. 653 , 124 N.W. 1000 (1910))

green JULIO LAGO v. MERCANTIL COMMERCEBANK, N.A., etc. (2021)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also

Further, “[t]he law of mortgage foreclosure in Florida contemplates that a deficiency judgment may be appropriate in a foreclosure suit, and as such, a deficiency proceeding is a continuation of the original foreclosure suit.” Estepa v. Jordan, 678 So. 2d 876, 878 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (footnote omitted); see also, Grace v. Hendricks, 140 So. 790, 795 (Fla. 1932) (stating that where the property to be foreclosed is sold before the foreclosure, a court has sufficient equity jur…

green David L. Griffin v. LaSalle Bank, N.A., etc. (2020)

Cited (see also) · Fla. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Grace v. Hendricks, 140 So. 790, 792-93, 795 (Fla. 1932) (concluding that the circuit court in a foreclosure case did not exceed its authority when, after entering the final decree of foreclosure, the circuit court stayed the scheduled sale and later reopened the pleadings, thereby vacating the foreclosure decree); Citation Way Condo.

concluding that the circuit court in a foreclosure case did not exceed its authority when, after entering the final decree of foreclosure, the circuit court stayed the scheduled sale and later reopened the pleadings, thereby vacating the foreclosure decree