How cited: Peterson v. Lott · Go Syfert

Peterson v. Lott (1946)

green · 58 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1946 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
194619862026
green Emmett v. Regions Bank (1999)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Peterson v. Lott, 200 Ga. 390, 392-393 (1) ( 37 SE2d 358 ) (1946).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Armour Fertilizer Works v. Dwight, 22 Ga. App. 144 (1) ( 95 SE 746 ); Peterson v. Lott, 200 Ga. 390, 393 ( 37 SE2d 358 ).
green UIV CORP. v. Oswald (1976)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Peterson v. Lott, 200 Ga. 390, 394 ( 37 SE2d 358 ); Ga. Power Co. v. Fountain, 207 Ga. 361, 366 ( 61 SE2d 454 ).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
In such a situation the rule requiring production of original writings has no application.” Peterson v. Lott, 200 Ga. 390, 392 ( 37 SE2d 358 ). 2.
Rule Authority · Ga.
Peterson v. Lott, 200 Ga. 390, 394 ( 37 SE2d 358 ); Ga. Power Co. v. Fountain, 207 Ga. *499 361, 366 ( 61 SE2d 454 ).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
In the case of Peterson v. Lott, 200 Ga. 390, 393 ( 37 SE2d 358 ), Justice Candler said: “It has been said that the so-called ‘inconsistency of remedies’ is in realty not an inconsistency between the remedies themselves, but must be taken to mean that a certain state of facts, relied on as the basis of a certain remedy, is inconsistent with and repugnant to another state of facts relied on as the basis of another remedy.
green Printup v. Smith (1956)
Rule Authority · Ga.
Counsel for the caveators cite Peterson v. Lott, 200 Ga. 390, 394 ( 37 S. E. 2d 358 ), and we believe one sentence therein defeats counsel’s position.
green McBurney v. Woodward (1952)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Special pleas generally must be filed at the first term. " See, in this connection, Peterson v. Lott, 200 Ga. 390, 393 ( 37 S. E. 2d, 358 ).
green ALMEDA v. the STATE. (2019)
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Emmett v. Regions Bank , 238 Ga. App. 455 , 458 (4), 518 S.E.2d 472 (1999) (" 'It is not contrary to the best-evidence rule that oral testimony of a fact in issue may be primary evidence thereof, although there is written evidence of the same fact' "), quoting *75 Peterson v. Lott , 200 Ga. 390 , 392-393 (1), 37 S.E.2d 358 (1946).
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: accord · 2 citations in this opinion
Accord, Peterson v. Lott, 200 Ga. 390, 392 ( 37 SE2d 358 ).
green Williams v. Kelley (1949)
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Peterson v. Lott, 200 Ga. 390 ( 37 S. E. 2d, 358 ).