United States v. Danny Mack Martin (1977)
green
· 43 citation events
across 13 courts.
Showing the 27 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197820022026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
United States v. Lane (1986)
See United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F. 2d 830, 843 (CA2 1980), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1111 (1981); United States v. Seidel, 620 F. 2d 1006 (CA4 1980); United States v. Hatcher, 680 F. 2d 438, 442 (CA6 1982); United States v. Varelli, 407 F. 2d 735, 747-748 (CA7 1969); United States v. Martin, 567 F. 2d 849, 854 (CA9 1977); Baker v. United States, 131 U. S. App. D.
United States v. Kaplan, supra, at 74 ; United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 853 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. Nettles, supra at 551 .
United States v. Reed, 726 F.2d 570, 576 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 221 , 83 L.Ed.2d 151 (1984); United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 852 (9th Cir.1977); Amsler v. United States, 381 F.2d 37 (9th Cir.1967).
green
United States v. Jasvir Kaur (2018)
The charges against each defendant arose “out of the same series of acts or transactions,” United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 853 (9th Cir. 1977), and a substantial number of the facts the Government needed to prove at trial were overlapping, United States v. Vasquez–Velasco, 15 F.3d 833, 844 (9th Cir. 1994).
green
United States v. Sarkisian (1999)
“Under this rule, when multiple defendants are involved, joinder is improper unless all offenses arise out of the same series of acts or transactions.” See United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 853 (9th Cir.1977).
green
United States v. Vasak Sarkisian, United States of America v. Vitaly Semenov, United States of America v. Ash… (1999)
"Under this rule, when multiple defendants are involved, joinder is improper unless all offenses arise out of the same series of acts or transactions." See United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 853 (9th Cir. 1977).
United States v. Lane, 474 U.S. 438, 446 (1986); United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 854 (9th Cir.1977).
green
United States v. Link (1991)
The appellate courts have upheld the refusal of district courts to issue a Rule 17(b) subpoena where the request was untimely, the testimony sought was cumulative, or the defendant failed to make a satisfactory showing of indigen-cy or necessity. [U.S. v.] Sims, supra, 637 F.2d [625] at 629 [(9th Cir.1980)], see, e.g., Hegwood, supra, 562 F.2d at 953 (timeliness and failure to show necessity); United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 852-53 (9th Cir.1977) (cumulative); United …
green
United States v. Edwin Francis Link, Robert Noble Casale, Louis John Ippolito, Barbara Jean Pace, Donald D'am… (1991)
The appellate courts have upheld the refusal of district courts to issue a Rule 17(b) subpoena where the request was untimely, the testimony sought was cumulative, or the defendant failed to make a satisfactory showing of indigency or necessity. [U.S. v.] Sims, supra, 637 F.2d at 629 [ (9th Cir.1980) ], see, e.g., Hegwood, supra, 562 F.2d at 953 (timeliness and failure to show necessity); United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 852-53 (9th Cir.1977) (cumulative); United State…
green
United States v. Louis Rinchack (1987)
Sims, supra, 637 F.2d at 629 ; see, e.g., Hegwood, supra, 562 F.2d at 953 (timeliness and failure to show necessity); United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 852-53 (9th Cir.1977) (cumulative); United States v. Stoker, 522 F.2d 576, 579 (10th Cir.1975) (timeliness and failure to show indigency and necessity).
green
United States v. George Krasovich (1987)
E.g., United States v. Brandon, 633 F.2d 773, 780 (9th Cir.1980); United States v. Young, 573 F.2d 1137, 1139 (9th Cir.1978); United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 851 (9th Cir.1977). "[W]e view the evidence and all inferences reasonably drawn from the evidence in the light most favorable to the government." United States v. Ramirez, 710 F.2d 535, 548 (9th Cir.1983).
green
United States v. Alfonso Velasquez, Ramon Dominguez, Esmerido Galvan Olamendi, Ramon Gomez, and Armando Gomez (1985)
See also United States v. Bledsoe, 674 F.2d 647, 654-56 (8th Cir.1982); United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 853-54 (9th Cir.1977).
green
United States v. Allan Harvey Bibby (82-5705), Edgar Hardin Gillock (82-5717), A. Arthur Ayers (82-5723) (1985)
See, e.g., United States v. Halper, 590 F.2d 422, 433 (2d Cir.1978) (misjoinder harmless if “our conviction is sure that the error did not influence the jury or had but slight effect”); United *1122 States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 854 (9th Cir.1977).
Decisions in some other circuits *991 permit the evidentiary showing to be made at trial: United States v. Leach, 613 F.2d 1295, 1299 (5th Cir.1980) (Court “may look ... at evidence adduced at trial to determine whether joinder was proper.”) (citing cases, n. 1); accord United States v. Butera, 677 F.2d 1376, 1385 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 735 , 74 L.Ed.2d 958 (1983); United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 853 (9th Cir.1977). 5 However, the tim…
green
United States v. Samuel Dewitt Crenshaw and David Allen Gordon, United States of America v. Dennis Leo Lehman (1983)
Crim.P. 17(b) is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, see, e.g., United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 853 (9 Cir.1977), and that the defendant must make a “satisfactory showing ... that the presence of the witness is necessary to an adequate defense.” In view of the trial court’s initial conclusion that the question of who planned the robbery was not an issue in the case, the rejection of the motion for a subpoena, standing alone, might well be within the …
green
United States v. Bledsoe (1982)
United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 853 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. Jackson, 562 F.2d 789, 796 (D.C.Cir.1977); King v. United States, 355 F.2d 700, 703 (1st Cir. 1966).
green
United States v. Carl L. Bledsoe, Jr., United States of America v. Thomas B. Moffitt, Jr., United States of A… (1982)
United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 853 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. Jackson, 562 F.2d 789, 796 (D.C.Cir.1977); King v. United States, 355 F.2d 700, 703 (1st Cir. 1966). 28 The Government also argues that the requirements of rule 8(b) are satisfied by proof of connections between PI and the crimes alleged in counts one through four.
green
United States v. Elliott Caplan (1980)
Rather, an agreement may be inferred from the acts of the parties and other circumstantial evidence indicating concert of action for accomplishment of a common purpose.” United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 851 (9th Cir. 1977).
green
United States v. Allen Gordon Sims (1980)
United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 852 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. Maynard, 485 F.2d 247, 248 (9th Cir. 1973).
United States v. Barney, 568 F.2d 134, 136 (9th Cir. 1978); United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 853 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. Satterfield, 548 F.2d 1341, 1344 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. Roselli, 432 F.2d 879, 899 (9th Cir. 1970).
green
Eubank v. State (1983)
U.S. v. Espinoza, 641 F.2d 153, 159 (4th Cir.1981) cert. den. 454 U.S. 841 , 102 S.Ct. 158 , 70 L.Ed.2d 125 (1981); U.S. v. Gilliss, 645 F.2d 1269, 1279 (8th Cir1981); U.S. v. Micklus, 581 F.2d 612, 616 (Tth Cir.1978); U.S. v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 852 (Oth Cir.1977).
green
United States v. Loren Michael Grey Bear, Tayron Dale Dunn, A/K/A Terry Dunn, Leonard George Fox and John Emm… (1988)
See United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 853-54 (9th Cir.1977) (Kennedy, J.) No such claim can be made here. 22 As in Lane, review of the trial evidence is necessitated only when the pretrial ruling allowing joinder under Rule 8(b) is found to have been in error.
green
United States v. Grey Bear (1988)
See United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 853-54 (9th Cir.1977) (Kennedy, J.) No such claim can be made here.
green
United States v. Jack Southard, United States of America v. Monsour Ferris, A/K/A Monte, United States of Ame… (1983)
See, e.g., United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849 (9th Cir.1977); Baker v. United States, 401 F.2d 958 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 836 , 89 S.Ct. 110 , 21 L.Ed.2d 106 (1968); United States v. Granello, 365 F.2d 990 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1019 , 87 S.Ct. 1367 , 18 L.Ed.2d 458 (1967).
green
United States v. Southard (1983)
See, e.g., United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1977); Baker v. United States, 401 F.2d 958 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 836 , 89 S.Ct. 110 , 21 L.Ed.2d 106 (1968); United States v. Granello, 365 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1019 , 87 S.Ct. 1367 , 18 L.Ed.2d 458 (1967).
green
United States v. Edward Ford, Robert Little, John Felix, Solomon Johnson, Phillip Usquiano, Marcus Thompson, … (1980)
See United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849, 854 (9th Cir.1977); United States v. Friedman, 445 F.2d 1076, 1083 (9th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom, 404 U.S. 958 , 92 S.Ct. 326 , 30 L.Ed.2d 275 (1971).
green
United States v. Haley (1981)
See United States v. Pitts, 569 F.2d 343 , 349 n. 10 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978) and United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1977).