How cited: Cluster 362478 · Go Syfert

Cluster 362478 (1978)

green · 48 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 14 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197820022026
Rule Authority · 4th Cir. · 3 citations in this opinion
Seigal v. Merrick, 590 F.2d at 37-38.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord, 449 U.S. 368, 375 , 101 S.Ct. 669, 674 , 66 L.Ed.2d 571 (1981); Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 658 , 97 S.Ct. 2034, 2039 , 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977); O'Reilly v. New York Times Co., 692 F.2d 863, 866 (2d Cir.1982). 21 This court has recognized that the collateral order exception is a narrow one and must continue to be read that way " 'lest this exception swallow the salutary "final judgment" rule,' " Seigal v. Merrick, 590 …
Rule Authority · 2d Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
This court has recognized that the collateral order exception is a narrow one and must continue to be read that way “ ‘lest this exception swallow the salutary “final judgment” rule,'" Seigal v. Merrick, 590 F.2d 35, 37 (2d Cir.1978) (quoting Weight Watchers of Philadelphia v. Weight Watchers Int'l, 455 F.2d 770, 773 (2d Cir.1972)).
Rule Authority · 4th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
This approval cannot be a rubber stamp adoption of what the parties alone agree is fair and equitable. 19 Seigal v. Merrick, 590 F.2d at 37-38.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Seigal v. Merrick, 590 F.2d 35, 39 (2d Cir. 1978) 2 The Circuits differ as to whether opting-out is permissible in Rule 23(b) (2) actions.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Seigal v. Merrick, 590 F.2d 35, 39 (2d Cir. 1978). .
Rule Authority · E.D. Ark.
In Seigal v. Merrick, 590 F.2d 35, 36 (2d Cir. 1978), the court held that “the refusal of the District Court to approve a settlement in a stockholder derivative action is not appealable under § 1291.” In a well-reasoned, thorough opinion which is equally applicable to disapproval of settlements in other types of class actions, including this antitrust case, the court rejected the argument that such orders were appeal-able under the collateral order doctrine.
green Wellman v. Dickinson (1980)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
However, court “approval cannot be a rubber stamp adoption of what the parties alone agree is fair and equitable.” Seigal v. Merrick, 590 F.2d 35, 37-38 (2d Cir. 1978).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
Seigal v. Merrick, 590 F.2d 35, 37-8 (2d Cir. 1978).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Kaufman, Must Every Appeal Run the Gamut? — The Civil Appeab Management Plan, 95 Yale L.J. 755 (1986). 4 .Thus, the instant order is quite distinct from that considered in Seigal v. Merrick, 590 F.2d 35 (2d Cir.1978).
Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Seigal v. Merrick, 590 F.2d 35, 37 (2d Cir.1978). 11 .
Cited · Mo. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Seigal v. Merrick, 590 F.2d 35, 37 (2d Cir. 1978).
Cited · Fed. Cl. · signal: see
See Seigal v. Merrick, 590 F.2d 35 , 37-38 (2nd Cir.1978); Greenspun v. Bogan, 492 F.2d 375, 378 (1st Cir. 1974).
Cited · E.D. Mich. · signal: see
See Seigal v. Merrick, 590 F.2d 35, 39 (2nd Cir.1978).