Cluster 366475 (1979)
green
· 68 citation events
across 27 courts.
Showing the 18 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197920022026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Arthur Clemens, Jr. v. Qwest Corp. (2017)
Co. of the Nw., 599 F.2d 322, 334-35 (9th Cir. 1979) (“Congress armed the courts with full equitable powers in Title VII cases. ...
“Congress armed the courts with full equitable powers in Title VII cases. ... The courts will be alert to adjust their remedies so as to grant the necessary relief.”
green
Arthur Clemens, Jr. v. Qwest Corp. (2017)
Co. of the Nw., 599 F.2d 322 , 334–35 (9th Cir. 1979) (“Congress armed the courts with full equitable powers in Title VII cases. . . .
“Congress armed the courts with full equitable powers in Title VII cases. . . . The courts will be alert to adjust their remedies so as to grant the necessary relief.”
green
Probe v. State Teachers' Retirement System (1986)
EEOC v. General Telephone Co., 599 F.2d at 334; accord 7A C.
green
Probe v. State Teachers' Retirement System (1986)
EEOC v. General Telephone Co., 599 F.2d at 334; accord 7A C.
Co. of the Northwest, Inc., 599 F.2d 322, 327 (9th Cir. 1979), aff'd, General Tel.
Co. of the Northwest, Inc., 599 F.2d 322, 327 (9th Cir. 1979), aff'd, General Tel.
green
Legere-Gordon v. FirstCredit Incorporated (2021)
Co. of Nw., 13 Inc., 599 F.2d 322 , 334 (9th Cir. 1979) (“When an action is 14 certified under Rule 23(b)(2) . . . absent class members are not 15 required to receive notice or to have the opportunity to opt-out 16 of the suit.”). 17 Even if the court determines that notice of class 18 certification under Rule 23(b)(2) is not necessary, notice of a 19 class action settlement may still be required under Rule 23(e) if 20 the proposed settlement would bind absent class members.
“When an action is 14 certified under Rule 23(b)(2) . . . absent class members are not 15 required to receive notice or to have the opportunity to opt-out 16 of the suit.”
Co. of Nw., Inc., 12 599 F.2d 322, 331 (9th Cir. 1979) (explaining Attorney General and EEOC may bring actions 13 under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-5 and 2000e-6, but individuals can only bring actions under 42 U.S.C. § 14 2000e-5), aff’d sub nom., Gen.
explaining Attorney General and EEOC may bring actions 13 under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-5 and 2000e-6, but individuals can only bring actions under 42 U.S.C. § 14 2000e-5
green
Legere-Gordon v. FirstCredit Incorporated (2021)
Co. of Nw., 22 Inc., 599 F.2d 322 , 334 (9th Cir. 1979) (“When an action is 23 certified under Rule 23(b)(2) . . . absent class members are not 24 required to receive notice or to have the opportunity to opt-out 25 of the suit.”). 26 In this case, the court required the parties to provide 27 notice to the class because the proposed settlement would bind 28 absent class members by waiving their right to bring a class 1 claim for damages against defendant.
“When an action is 23 certified under Rule 23(b)(2) . . . absent class members are not 24 required to receive notice or to have the opportunity to opt-out 25 of the suit.”
Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v. General Telephone Co., 599 F.2d 322 327 (9th Cir.1979).
green
Beebe v. Pacific Realty Trust (1983)
Co. of the Northwest, 599 F.2d 322, 327 (9th Cir.1979), aff’d, 446 U.S. 318 , 100 S.Ct. 1698 , 64 L.Ed.2d 319 (1980).
green
Dorsey v. Smith (1981)
C. v. General Telephone Company of the Northwest, 599 F.2d 322, 324 (9th Cir. 1979), aff’d 446 U.S. 318 , 100 S.Ct. 1698 , 64 L.Ed.2d 319 (1980).
green
Boyd v. Bechtel Corp. (1979)
Because the class was originally certified pursuant to Rule 23(b)(2), and because it is clear that “[when] an action is certified under Rule 23(b)(2), * * * absent class members are not required to receive notice * *," EEOC v. General Electric Telephone Co. of Northwest, Inc., 599 F.2d 322, 334 (9th Cir., 1979), Wright & Miller, 7A Federal Practice and Procedure § 1786 (1st ed. 1972), notice was neither required nor sent at the time of certification. 28 In light of the conte…
green
Gaskill v. Specter (1980)
Accord, EEOC v. General Telephone Co. of Northwest, 599 F.2d 322 , 330 (9th Cir.), cert. granted, 444 U.S. 989 , 100 S.Ct. 518 , 62 L.Ed.2d 418 (1979).
green
Waldron v. Perkins Coie LLP (2021)
The courts will be alert to adjust their remedies so as to grant the necessary relief.” United States v. Martinson, 809 F.2d 1364 , 1367–68 (9th Cir. 1987); see EEOC v. General Telephone Co., 599 F.2d 322 , 334 (9th Cir.1979), aff'd 446 U.S. 318 , 100 S.Ct. 1698 , 64 L.Ed.2d 319 (1980).
green
Arnold v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. (1994)
See, e.g., EEOC v. General Telephone Co., 599 F.2d 322 , 334 (9th Cir.1979); see also Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 251 (3d Cir.) (gathering cases), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 , 44 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975).
green
Smith v. Travis County Education District (1992)
See Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. General Telephone Co., 599 F.2d 322 , 334 (9th Cir.1979) affirmed 446 U.S. 318 , 100 S.Ct. 1698 , 64 L.Ed.2d 319 (1980); see also Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156, 177, n. 14 , 94 S.Ct. 2140, 2152, n. 14 , 40 L.Ed.2d 732 (1974).
See, e. g., EEOC v. General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, 599 F.2d 322 (9th Cir. 1979); EEOC v. D.