How cited: Anthony v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc. · Go Syfert

Anthony v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc. (1979)

green · 26 citation events across 12 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197920022026
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
First, the new overview brochure (P19) contains an important internal reference to “summary plan descriptions.” See Anthony v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 611 F.2d 944, 948 (3d Cir.1979).
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
First, the new overview brochure (P19) contains an important internal reference to "summary plan descriptions." See Anthony v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 611 F.2d 944, 948 (3d Cir.1979).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Anthony v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 611 F.2d 944, 948 (3d Cir.1979); Freeman, 27 Mich.App. 572 , 183 N.W.2d at 835 ; Don-Ray Tool & Die, Inc. v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., 381 Mich. 416 , 163 N.W.2d 225, 227 (1968).
Rule Authority · E.D. Va.
Handbook and the plan.”) [citing Anthony v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 611 F.2d 944, 948 (3d Cir.1979); Higgins v. Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund, 524 F.Supp. 601, 607 (E.D.Pa.1981) ]. 22 .
Rule Authority · Bankr. M.D. Fla.
As was written in Anthony v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 611 F.2d 944, 948 (3d Cir. 1979): Anthony’s reliance on the summaries of the Ryder plan provided in 1970 and in 1974 (when the plan was amended), is misplaced.
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
(See n. 5, supra.) Therefore, the denial of summary judgment in this already protracted and somewhat duplicative litigation would hardly further the policy of Rule 56 to “eliminate a trial in cases where it is unnecessary and would only cause delay and expense.” Anthony v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., No. 79-1539, Slip op. at 7, 611 F.2d 944 at 947 (3d Cir. 1979), quoting Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir. 1976). ' In determining whether the GAO’s purpose …
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: compare
Compare, e. g., Anthony v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 466 F.Supp. 1287, 1292-93 (E.D.Pa.1979), rev'd on other grounds, 611 F.2d 944 (3rd Cir. 1979).
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: compare
Compare, e. g., Anthony v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 466 F.Supp. 1287, 1292-93 (E.D.Pa.1979), rev’d on other grounds, 611 F.2d 944 (3rd Cir. 1979).
Cited · N.D. Ind. · signal: see
See Anthony v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 611 F.2d 944, 948 (3d Cir.1979); Higgins v. Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund, 524 F.Supp. 601, 607 (E.D.Pa.1981).
green Freund v. Gerson (1985)
Cited (see also) · S.D. Fla. · signal: see also
See also Anthony v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 611 F.2d 944, 947 (3rd Cir.1979) (no recovery "[a]bsent proof of an estoppel”); Zittrouer v. Uarco Incorporated Group Benefit Plan, 582 F.Supp. 1471, 1475 (N.D.Ga.1984) (Plaintiff must show (1) an intentional deception through concealment or inaction, or gross negligence amounting to constructive fraud; (2) justifiable reliance; and (3) damages). 4 .
green Baird v. Marley Co. (1982)
Cited · E.D. Pa. · signal: see
See Anthony v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 611 F.2d 944, 947 (3d Cir. 1979); Drexel v. Union Prescription Centers, Inc., 582 F.2d 781, 790 (3d Cir. 1978).