How cited: Nelson Hernandez v. C. Lattimore, Nathaniel Mitchell, Hugh Herbert, N. Avignone, and R. B… · Go Syfert

Nelson Hernandez v. C. Lattimore, Nathaniel Mitchell, Hugh Herbert, N. Avignone, and R. Brown, Correctional Officers, Metropolitan Correctional Center (1979)

green · 38 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 18 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197920022026
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Cameron v. IRS, 773 F.2d 126, 129 (7th Cir.1985); Askew v. Millerd, 191 F.3d 953 , 958 (8th Cir.1999); Duciano v. Galindo, 944 F.2d 261, 264 (5th Cir.1991); Committee of U.S. Citizens Living in Nicaragua v. Reagan, 859 F.2d 929, 948-49 (D.C.Cir. 1988); Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1979); Johnson v. Glick, supra, 481 F.2d at 1033 ; cf. County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 , 847 n. 8, 118 S.Ct. 1708 , 140 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1998).
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Cir. 1988); Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1979); Johnson v. Glick, supra, 481 F.2d at 1033 ; cf. County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 , 847 n. 8 (1998).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Counsel may also produce affidavits from individuals stating that upon reading or hearing of “Match Set” they believed the protagonist to be derived from appellant. 6 Had such an additional submission been made by appellant pursuant to the dismissal motions, the trial judge could have construed the application as a motion for summary judgment, Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., and evaluated the sufficiency of the evidence according to procedures prescribed under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P…
green Ortiz v. Pearson (2000)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y. · 2 citations in this opinion
Finally, in its decision in Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61, 64 (2d Cir.1979), the Second Circuit held that, in addition to his FTCA claim, the plaintiff had a Bivens claim arising out of his beating by federal correctional officials.
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
Realty Corp., 994 F.2d 105, 108 (2d Cir. 1993) (citing Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1979)); Rucks v. City of New York, 96 F. Supp. 3d 138, 152 (S.D.N.Y. 2015).
Quote Authority · D. Ariz.
Although airport 20 screenings have been deemed administrative searches, and “Terry typically requires 21 reasonable suspicion for a search[,] . . . the existence of reasonable suspicion determines 22 2 See, e.g., Caban v. United States, 671 F.2d 1230 , 1234 n.4 (2d Cir. 1982) (INS agents empowered to search and arrest); Nurse v. United States, 226 F.3d 996, 1002 (9th 23 Cir. 2000) (Customs and Border Patrol officers empowered to arrest); Celestine v. United States, 841 F.2d…
“officers or employees of the Bureau of 25 Prisons of the Department of Justice [] [may] make arrests”
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Civ.P., and evaluated the sufficiency of the evidence according to procedures prescribed under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., cf. Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61, 64 (2d Cir.1979).
Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61 (2d Cir. 1979); Dellums v. Powell, 566 F.2d 167 (D.C.
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61 , 64 n.7 (2d Cir. 1979).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61 , 64 n.7 (2d Cir. 1979).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1979), citing Johnson v. Glick, 481 F.2d 1028, 1033 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1979), citing Johnson v. Glick, 481 F.2d 1028, 1033 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
Johnson v. Glick, 481 F.2d 1028 , 1033 (2d Cir.) (footnote omitted), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1033 , 94 S.Ct. 462 , 38 L.Ed.2d 324 (1973); see Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1979); Santiago v. Yarde, 487 F.Supp. 52, 54 (S.D.N.Y.1980).
Cited · D. Maryland · signal: see
See Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61, 64 (2d Cir.1979) (finding that federal correctional officers “fall within the definition of “investigative or law enforcement officers” by virtue of 18 U.S.C. § 3050 , which empowers officers or employees of the Bureau of Prisons of the Department of Justice to make arrests.”); United States v. Sababu, 891 F.2d 1308, 1328-1329 (7th Cir.1989) (holding that prison officials are “investigative or law enforcement officers”); see also Pica…
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61, 67 (2d Cir.1979); Merzon v. County of Suffolk, 767 F.Supp. 432, 448 (E.D.N.Y.1991); Coopersmith v. Gold, 172 A.D.2d 982 , 568 N.Y.S.2d 250, 252 (3d Dep't 1991). 7 .
Cited · D. Alaska · signal: see
See Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61 , 64 n. 7 (2d Cir.1979) ( 18 U.S.C. § 3050 ).
green Dale v. Bartels (1982)
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61 (2d Cir.1979).
green Tomarkin v. Ward (1982)
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Hernandez v. Lattimore, 612 F.2d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1979); Arroyo v. Schaefer, supra, 548 F.2d at 50 .