How cited: United States v. Harry M. Jeffers, Jr., A/K/A Hal Jeffers · Go Syfert

United States v. Harry M. Jeffers, Jr., A/K/A Hal Jeffers (1980)

green · 21 citation events across 10 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198020032026
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
United States v. Merlo, 704 F.2d 331, 332 (6th Cir.1983); United States v. Jeffers, 621 F.2d 221, 225-26 (5th Cir.1980) (‘‘[T]he 1974 revisions and the concomitant change in Treasury Department practices have eliminated the ‘real and appreciable’ hazards of self-incrimination that existed under the prior law since Section 4244 makes the tax disclosures unavailable to law enforcement authorities.”); United States v. Sahadi, 555 F.2d 23 (2d Cir.1977).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
In at least one other decision, we have assumed that the section 1905 penalties applied only to "unauthorized disclosure of confidential governmental information." United States v. Jeffers, 621 F.2d 221, 226 (5th Cir.1980) (emphasis added). 4 .
green United States v. Jones (1990)
Rule Authority · cma
Cf. United States v. Haydel, 649 F.2d 1152, 1159 (5th Cir.1981); United States v. Jeffers, 621 F.2d 221, 226 (5th Cir.1980).
green Lane v. State (1983)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
United States v. Jeffers, 621 F.2d 221, 227 (5th Cir.1980).
green Pope v. State (1982)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
U.S. v. Jeffers, 621 F.2d 221, 226 (5th Cir. 1980).
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Jeffers, 621 F.2d 221, 227 (5th Cir. 1980); United States v. Scott, 555 F.2d 522 , 528 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 985 , 98 S.Ct. 610 , 54 L.Ed.2d 478 (1977).
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Jeffers, 621 F.2d 221, 226-27 (5th Cir.1980) (it is sufficient if affiant received his information regarding the informant's reliability from another police or enforcement agency). 10 If the rule were as advocated by defendant, it would have two very significant negative consequences.
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Jeffers, 621 F.2d 221, 226 (5th Cir. 1980); United States v. Stavros, 597 F.2d 108, 114 (7th Cir.1979); United States v. Sahadi, 555 F.2d 23, 27 (2d Cir.1977).
Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see also
Allegations of negligence or innocent mistake are insufficient.” Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 171 , 98 S.Ct. 2674, 2684 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978); see also United States v. Jeffers, 621 F.2d 221, 227 (5th Cir. 1980).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Jeffers, 621 F.2d 221, 225 (5th Cir. 1980); United States v. Stavros, 597 F.2d 108, 114 (7th Cir. 1979); United States v. Sahadi, 555 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1977).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Jeffers, 621 F.2d 221, 225 (5th Cir. 1980); United States v. Stavros, 597 F.2d 108, 114 (7th Cir. 1979); United States v. Sahadi, 555 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1977).
green Bevers v. State (1983)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See United States v. Jeffers, 621 F.2d 221 (5th Cir.1980); Cf. Gish v. State, 606 S.W.2d 883 (Tex.Cr.App.1980).
Cited (see also) · S.D. Fla. · signal: see also
See also, United States v. Jeffers, 621 F.2d 221, 227 (5th Cir.1980).