United States v. Richard Lee Williams, United States of America v. Jack A. Terrell, United States of America v. Raymon L. Terrell (1981)
green
· 40 citation events
across 10 courts.
Showing the 12 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198120032026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
United States v. James J. Kassouf (1998)
See, e.g., United States v. Hanson, 2 F.3d 942, 946-47 (9th Cir.1993) (affirming conviction under § 7212(a)’s omnibus clause where defendant submitted false 1099 and 1096 forms to the IRS showing fictitious payments to Farmers Home Administration officials and filed a false personal tax return claiming a fraudulent tax refund); United States v. Mitchell, 985 F.2d 1275, 1276-79 (4th Cir. 1993) (finding defendant properly charged under § 7212(a) where conduct alleged involved …
holding that conduct of assisting the preparation and filing of false W-4 forms constituted endeavor to corruptly impede or obstruct the due administration of the Revenue Code
green
United States v. Richard M. Mitchell (1993)
See Popkin, 943 F.2d at 1540 (word corruptly was used to “prohibit all activities that seek to thwart the efforts of government officers and employees in executing the laws enacted by Congress”); Williams, 644 F.2d at 700 (the broad language of section 7212(a)’s clause demands a correspondingly broad construction).
the broad language of section 7212(a)’s clause demands a correspondingly broad construction
green
United States v. Karl Foster (2000)
See United States v. Ervasti, 201 F.3d 1029, 1037-38 (8th Cir. 2000) (§ 371 charge); United States v. Warner, 428 F.2d 730, 735 (8th Cir.) (§ 7206(2) charge), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 930 (1970); United States v. Williams, 644 F.2d 696, 699, 701 (8th Cir.) (§ 7212(a) charges), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 841 (1981). -2- Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
See 26 U.S.C. § 7212 (penalizing use of corruption, force, or threat of force to obstruct the administration of Title 26); 18 U.S.C. § 2 ; United States v. Williams, 644 F.2d 696, 701 (8th Cir.) (physically assisting the filing of false tax forms constitutes violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7212 ), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 841 , 102 S.Ct. 151 , 70 L.Ed.2d 124 (1981).
green
United States v. Marvin Pullman (1999)
See 26 U.S.C. § 7212 (penalizing use of corruption, force, or threat of force to obstruct the administration of Title 26); 18 U.S.C. § 2 ; United States v. Williams, 644 F.2d 696, 701 (8th Cir.) (physically assisting the filing of false tax forms constitutes violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7212 ), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 841 (1981).
See United States v. Bostian, 59 F.3d 474, 477 (4th Cir.1995), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 929 , 133 L.Ed.2d 857 (1996); United States v. Williams, 644 F.2d 696, 699 (8th Cir.1981).
green
United States v. Wilson (1997)
See United States v. Bostian, 59 F.3d 474, 477 (4th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 929 (1996); United States v. Williams, 644 F.2d 696, 699 (8th Cir. 1981).
green
United States v. Swanson (1997)
See 26 U.S.C. § 7212 (a); United States v. Williams, 644 F.2d 696, 699 (8th Cir. 1981).
green
United States v. James Foster (1986)
The amendment was made in response to United States v. Williams, 644 F.2d 696, 700 (8th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
green
United States v. Armstrong (1997)
Id. at 1277-79 (citing Popkin, 943 F.2d 1535 , and United States v. Williams, 644 F.2d 696, 700 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 841 , 102 S.Ct. 150 , 151, 70 L.Ed.2d 124 (1981) (“the broad language of § 7212(a)’s omnibus clause demands a correspondingly broad construction”)).
green
United States v. Kamalu (2008)
Compare United States v. Aramony, 88 F.3d 1369, 1382 (4th Cir. 1996) (setting forth the elements of § 7206(2)) with United States v. Williams, 644 F.2d 696, 699 (8th Cir.1981) (setting forth the elements of § 7212(a)).
green
United States v. David N. Bowman (1999)
United States v. Kassouf, 144 F.3d 952, 955 (6th Cir.1998); see United States v. Williams, 644 F.2d 696, 699 (8th Cir.1981).