Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. Interstate Commerce Commission (1981)
green
· 73 citation events
across 29 courts.
Showing the 14 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198120032026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Herman v. Héctor I. Nieves Transport, Inc. (2001)
Shipping, 645 F.2d at 1112 (“[I]t is clear beyond cavil that the limitation clause itself was added to section 203 solely for the purpose of foreclosing [the] regulation of transportation within the territories or possessions.”) (emphasis added); Trailer Marine, 602 F.2d at 392-393 (“[A]t least for purposes of trade between ports of *37 Puerto Rico and inland points of the United States, the limitation clause does not bar ... jurisdiction.”) (emphasis added).
“[I]t is clear beyond cavil that the limitation clause itself was added to section 203 solely for the purpose of foreclosing [the] regulation of transportation within the territories or possessions.”
green
American Hospital Association v. Alex Azar, II (2020)
See Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 645 F.2d 1102 , 1112 n.26 (D.C.
“It is hornbook law that 10 the use of the word ‘including’ indicates that the specified list . . . that follows is illustrative, not exclusive.”
We note that in Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. ICC, supra, 645 F.2d at 1112, and Trailer Marine Transport Corp. v. Federal Maritime Comm., supra, 602 F.2d at 393, the Court addressed the jurisdictional boundaries of the ICC and FMC based upon the relevant statutes without reference to the maritime or non-maritime nature of the regulated activity.
green
Maniilaq Association v. Sebelius (2014)
Shipping Auth. v. ICC, 645 F.2d 1102 , 1112 n. 27 (D.C.
“It is hornbook law that the use of the word ‘including’ indicates that the specified list of carriers that follows is illustrative, not exclusive.”
green
Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board (2012)
App. 3d 912, 920 (1995) (“We, too, find the word ‘including,’ in its commonly understood meaning, to be a term of enlargement, not of limitation.”); Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 645 F.2d 1102 , 1112 n.26 (D.C.
“It is hornbook law that the use of the word ‘including’ indicates that the specified list *** is illustrative, not exclusive.”
green
Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A. (2001)
See Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Auth. v. ICC, 645 F.2d 1102 , 1112 n. 26 (D.C.Cir.1981) (“It is hornbook law that the use of the word ‘including’ indicates that the specified list ... that follows is illustrative, not exclusive.” (citation omitted)).
green
In Re Mark Anthony Construction, Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. Ian Ledlin, Trustee (1989)
See, e.g., Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. I.C.C., 645 F.2d 1102 , 1112 n. 5 (D.C.Cir.1981) (“hornbook law” that list fqllowing the word “including” is “illustrative, not exclusive”); Gould & Eberhardt, 69 B.R. at 947 (“ ‘includes’ and ‘including’ are not limiting language” when used in the Bankruptcy Code) (citing 11 U.S.C. § 102 (3)); Cash Currency, 762 F.2d at 552 (“includes” or “including” demonstrates that Congress “intended to make the list of [terms] illust…
green
Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority and Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Valley Freight Systems, Inc. (1988)
See Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Auth. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 645 F.2d 1102 (D.C.Cir.1981); 49 U.S.C. §§ 10521 (a)(1)(C), 10703(a)(4)(B), (a)(4)(D)(ii) (1982).
FMC
See Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Auth. v. ICC, 645 F.2d 1102 (D.C.Cir.1981); Trailer Marine Transp.
green
Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, Trailer … (1982)
See also Trailways, Inc. v. ICC, 673 F.2d 514 at 517 (D.C.Cir.1982) 33 See Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Auth. v. ICC, 645 F.2d 1102 (D.C.Cir.1981); Trailer Marine Transp.
green
State v. Philip Morris Inc. (2008)
See, e.g., Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Auth. v. I.C.C., 645 F.2d 1102 , 1112 (1981) (“including, without limitation” clause identifies examples that are specifically included in the general language they follow).
“including, without limitation” clause identifies examples that are specifically included in the general language they follow
See Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Auth. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n 645 F.2d 1102 , 1105 (D.C.Cir.1981). .
green
Williams v. Glickman (1996)
See Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. I.C.C., 645 F.2d 1102 (D.D.C.1981) (use of the word “including” indicates that the list which follows is illustrative, not exclusive).
green
Varsity Carpet Services, Inc. v. Richardson (1992)
See Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. I.C.C., 645 F.2d 1102 , 1112 n. 5 (D.C.Cir.1981).