Stanley A. Klopp, Inc. v. John Deere Co (1982)

See Klopp v. John Deere Co., 510 F.Supp. 807, 812 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 676 F.2d 688 (3rd Cir.1982) (interpreting agreement's provision that limits damages resulting from termination as applying only to terminations in accord with the agreement's terms renders the provision meaningless because it states the obvious--if terminated according to terms then no breach and no damages).

See Stanley A. Klopp, Inc. v. John Deere Co., 510 F.Supp. 807, 809 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 676 F.2d 688 (3d Cir.1982) (court stated that if the U.C.C. was not applicable by its own terms, it would apply it by force of analogy); Artman v. International Harvester Co., 355 F.Supp. 482, 486 (W.D.Pa.1973) (dealership distribution franchises fall within the sales section of the U.C.C.). *135 Regardless, the court need not decide whether the U.C.C. applies to the instant action becau…

See Stanley A. Klopp, Inc. v. John Deere Company, 510 F.Supp. 807 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff'd 676 F.2d 688 (3d Cir.1982).

See United States v. Ferrs, 503 F.Supp. 187 (E.D.Pa.1980) aff'd 676 F.2d 688 (1982) (a defendant does not become an "accused” for Speedy Trial Act purposes until he is under federal arrest); see also United States v. Mejias, 417 F.Supp. 585 , 591 n. 6 (S.D.N.Y.) aff’d 552 F.2d 435 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. *1045 847, 98 S.Ct. 154 , 54 L.Ed.2d 115 (1977) (dual sovereignity requires that the federal government in no way be bound by the action of the state prosecuto…

See, e.g., Stanley A. Klopp, Inc. v. John Deere Co., 510 F.Supp. 807, 810 (E.D.Pa. 1981) , aff'd mem., 676 F.2d 688 (3d Cir. 1982) .