Cluster 408088 (1982)
green
· 83 citation events
across 18 courts.
Showing the 32 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198120032026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
yellow
Executive Securities Corp. v. Doe (1983)
But see In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Miller), 687 F.2d 1079 , 1091-92 (7th Cir.1982); In re Grand Jury Investigation (Sells), supra, 642 F.2d at 1191-92 .
yellow
In Re Application Of Executive Securities Corporation (1983)
But see In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Miller), 687 F.2d 1079 , 1091-92 (7th Cir.1982); In re Grand Jury Investigation (Sells), supra, 642 F.2d at 1191-92 .
green
Elliot Carlson v. United States (2016)
We have already gone so far as to say, in dicta, that “[w]e may not always be bound by a strict and literal interpretation of Rule 6(e) in the situation where there is some extraordinary and compelling need for disclosure in the interest of justice, and little traditional need for secrecy remains[.]” In re Special Feb., 1975 Grand Jury, 662 F.2d 1232, 1238 (7th Cir. 1981) aff'd on other grounds sub nom., United States v. Baggot, 463 U.S. 476 , 103 S.Ct. 3164 , 77 L.Ed.2d 785…
district court “may not always be bound by a strict and literal interpretation of Rule 6(e)”
green
Lucas v. Turner (1984)
We have held that "[a] request for grand jury documents may evoke different, and less exacting considerations than a request for transcripts of grand jury testimony." Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1089 (7th Cir.1982).
green
Lucas v. Turner (1984)
We have held that “[a] request for grand jury documents may evoke different, and less exacting considerations than a request for transcripts of grand jury testimony.” Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1089 (7th Cir.1982).
green
In Re Petition of Bruce Craig for Order Directing Release of Grand Jury Minutes. Bruce Craig v. United States (1997)
See, e.g., In re Hastings, 735 F.2d at 1267-68 ; In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1088 (7th Cir.1982) (stating, in dictum, that a court may have discretion to disclose grand jury records when there is an extraordinary and compelling need to do so in the interests of justice), vacated in part, 717 F.2d 1136 (7th Cir.1983); In re Special February, 1975 Grand Jury, 662 F.2d 1232, 1235-36 (7th Cir.1981), aff'd sub nom.
green
United States v. Eugene B. Sherry (1995)
Under our case law, moreover, the disclosure of grand jury material is "left to the sound discretion of the district court and will not be reversed in the absence of an abuse of discretion." In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1088 (7th Cir.1982). 5 For these reasons, as we stated in our ruling from the bench, the conviction and sentence of Eugene B.
green
In Re Petition of Elizabeth L. Moore, of the Estate of Colvert E. Moore, Deceased. Appeals of Velsicol Chemic… (1985)
The appellants on the other hand rely on our decision in In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1085 (7th Cir.1982), which allowed an appeal to be taken from an order transferring grand jury transcripts to the United States Tax Court.
green
In re Moore (1985)
The appellants on the other hand rely on our decision in In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1085 (7th Cir.1982), which allowed an appeal to be taken from an order transferring grand jury transcripts to the United States Tax Court.
green
United States v. David W. Warren (1984)
For other cases where courts have held that the defendant has not made a sufficiently strong showing to justify disclosure of grand jury materials, see Lucas v. Turner, 725 F.2d 1095, 1099-1109 (7th Cir.1984); United States v. Bennett, 702 F.2d 833, 836 (9th Cir.1983); Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1093 (7th Cir.1982); In re Grand Jury Matter, 682 F.2d 61, 63-67 (3d Cir.1982).
green
United States v. Dean J. Lisinski (1984)
“Rule 6(e) codifies the traditional practice of grand jury secrecy.” Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Company, 687 F.2d 1079, 1088 (7th Cir.1982).
As the court here already cautioned Plaintiffs in connection with their March 2023 motion to compel, (see R. 274, May 11, 2023 Order at 2), the Seventh Circuit’s view is that “[Criminal] Rule 6(e) is applicable in a general way to both documents and testimony before the grand jury.” Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1090 (7th Cir. 1982).
green
In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation (2020)
Analysis Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(2)(B) protects from disclosure “a matter occurring before the grand jury.” The Seventh Circuit has held that “Rule 6(e) is applicable in a general way to both documents and testimony before the grand jury.” Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1090 (7th Cir. 1982).
green
Anilao v. Spota (2013)
Corp., No. 71 Civ. 4932 (D.N.E.), 87 F.R.D. 100, 105 (S.D.N.Y.1980); .see also In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1089 (7th Cir.1982).
green
United States v. Finley (1988)
Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States, 360 U.S. 395, 400 , 79 S.Ct. 1237, 1241 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1959); Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1088 (7th Cir.1982).
green
Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. South-Coast Bank (1985)
Therefore, the policy of secrecy and the required showing of particularized need for disclosure of grand jury materials applies only to “matters occurring before the grand jury.” Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Company, 687 F.2d 1079, 1089 [7th Cir.1982].
See In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079 , 1085 (7th Cir.1982), modified on other grounds, 717 F.2d 1136 (1983); United States v. Carney, 665 F.2d 1064, 1065 (D.C.Cir.1981) (per curiam); 9 Moore's Federal Practice p 110.13, at p. 193 (2d ed. 1983).
green
Columbia/St David's v. CIR (2001)
See I.R.C. § 7442; see also In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 687 F.2d 1079 , 1097 (7th Cir 1982).
green
Gilbert v. United States (2000)
See In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1092 (7th Cir. 1982) (observing "that cost considerations are not usually enough by themselves to constitute particularized need").
observing "that cost considerations are not usually enough by themselves to constitute particularized need"
See also Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1088 (7th Cir.1982).
green
In The Matter Of Grand Jury Proceedings, Special September, 1986. Appeals Of Chester L. Blair (1991)
See also Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1088 (7th Cir.1982).
green
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (1988)
United States v. Baggot, 463 U.S. 476 , 103 S.Ct. 3164 , 77 L.Ed.2d 785 (1983); see In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Miller Brewing Co.), 687 F.2d 1079, 1089-90 (7th Cir.1982).
green
In re Special March 1981 Grand Jury (1985)
See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1089-90 (7th Cir.1982); In re Special February 1975 Grand Jury, 662 F.2d 1232, 1244 (7th Cir.1981) (supplemental opinion), aff’d under the name of United States v. Baggot, 463 U.S. 476 , 103 S.Ct. 3164 , 77 L.Ed.2d 785 (1983); United States v. Stanford, 589 F.2d 285, 291 (7th Cir.1978); United States v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc., 280 F.2d 52, 54 (2d Cir.1960).
green
Sells, Inc. v. United States (1983)
See In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Company, 687 F.2d 1079 , 1086 (7th Cir. 1982). .
green
In Re Sells (1983)
See In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Company, 687 F.2d 1079 , 1086 (7th Cir.1982) 8 Cases decided since the issuance of the district court's disclosure order have clarified the relationship between allegations of abuse and the standards for granting a "(C)(i)" disclosure order.
green
Medicare&medicaid Gu 34,492 (1981)
See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079 , 1089-90 (7th Cir.1982); In re Special February 1975 Grand Jury, 662 F.2d 1232, 1244 (7th Cir.1981) (supplemental opinion), aff'd under the name of United States v. Baggot, 463 U.S. 476 , 103 S.Ct. 3164 , 77 L.Ed.2d 785 (1983); United States v. Stanford, 589 F.2d 285, 291 (7th Cir.1978); United States v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc., 280 F.2d 52, 54 (2d Cir.1960). 6 Illinois needs the appellants' …
green
Application of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, for an Order Authorizing the Re… (2019)
Douglas Oil, 441 U.S. at 219 ; see also Wright & Miller, supra, § 106.
green
The New York Times Co. v. Gonzales (2005)
Id.; see also In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Miller Brewing Co.), 687 F.2d 1079, 1098 (7th Cir.1982) (affirming district court's decision to grant government's request to disclose certain grand jury materials in connection with a judicial proceeding pursuant to former Rule 6(e)(3)(C)(i), now found at Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e)(3)(E)(i)).
green
Alexander v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (1998)
See In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1089 (7th Cir.1982) (“A request for grand jury documents may evoke different, and less exacting considerations than a request for transcripts of grand jury testimony.”); SEC v. Everest Management Corp., 87 F.R.D. 100, 105 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (same).
green
United States v. Reiners (1996)
See also In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Miller Brewing Co.), 687 F.2d 1079, 1090 (7th Cir. 1982), aff'd on rehearing, 717 F.2d 1136 (7th Cir. 1983); Fund for Constitutional Government v. National Archives & Records Service, 656 F.2d 856, 869-70 (D.C.Cir.1981); In re Grand Jury Investigation, 630 F.2d 996, 1001 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1081 , 101 S.Ct. 865 , 66 L.Ed.2d 805 (1980).
green
Gavosto v. Commissioner (1994)
In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Kluger) , 827 F.2d 868 , 871 (2d Cir. 1987) ; ARC Electrical Construction Co. v. Commissioner , 91 T.C. at 952-953 ; see In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co. , 687 F.2d 1079 , 1095-1096 (7th Cir. 1982) .
green
State of Ill. v. Borg, Inc. (1983)
See In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Miller Brewing Co., 687 F.2d 1079, 1089-90 (7th Cir.1982). 4 .