United States v. Juan Manuel Tovar (1982)
green
· 32 citation events
across 12 courts.
Showing the 21 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198420052026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
The rationale supporting the hearsay rule's penal-interest exception--that persons generally "will not make damaging statements against themselves unless they are true[,]" United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1213 (8th Cir.1982)--therefore does not apply to Brown's statement.
green
United States v. Eddie A. Moreno (2002)
United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1215 (8th Cir. 1982).
green
United States v. Eddie Alcarez Moreno (2002)
United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1215 (8th Cir.1982).
green
United States v. Darryl Tipton (1992)
United States v. Marler, 614 F.2d 47, 50 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Green, 523 F.2d 229, 236-37 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1074 , 96 S.Ct. 858 , 47 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1215 (8th Cir.1982).
green
United States v. Harley Joe Seabolt (1992)
United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1213 (8th Cir.1982).
United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1215 (8th Cir.1982).
green
United States v. Rubiel Marin-Cifuentes, United States of America v. Dairo Jesus Rios, United States of Ameri… (1989)
United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1213 (8th Cir.1982).
green
United States v. Robert E. Young (1987)
Smalley v. United States, 798 F.2d 1182 (8th Cir., 1986); United States v. Curnew, 788 F.2d 1335, 1338 (8th Cir.1986); United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1215 (8th Cir.1982).
green
United States v. Cornelius Franklin (1984)
Whether a witness is qualified within the meaning of this rule is a preliminary question for the trial judge under Fed.R.Evid. 104(a), and this determination will not be disturbed unless “manifestly erroneous.” United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1215 (8th Cir.1982) (quoting Salem v. United States Line Co., 370 U.S. 31, 35 , 82 S.Ct. 1119, 1122 , 8 L.Ed.2d 313 (1962)). 8 .
green
Commonwealth v. Drew (1986)
See, e.g., United States v. Silverstein, 732 F.2d 1338, 1346 (7th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1111 (1985); United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1213 (8th Cir. 1982); People v. Chapman, 50 Cal. App. 3d 872, 880 (1975). 9 These ambiguities have been the subject of judicial and scholarly criticism.
green
United States v. Yorgensen (2015)
See United States v. Riesselman, 646 F.3d 1072, 1080 (8th Cir.2011); see also United States v. Lakoskey, 462 F.3d 965, 975 (8th Cir.2006); United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez, 384 F.3d 562, 565 (8th Cir.2004); United States v. Moreno, 280 F.3d 898, 900 (8th Cir.2002); United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1215 (8th Cir.1982) (citing Brown v, Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975)).
green
United States v. Magallanes (2010)
Moreno, 280 F.3d at 900 (citing Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1215 (8th Cir.1982)); Yousif, 308 F.3d at 830 .
green
People v. Barrera (1996)
Noel, 938 F.2d at 688-689 ; Salvador, 820 F.2d at 562 ; Lopez, 777 F.2d at 554 ; Brainard , n. 11 supra at 1125; Satterfield, 572 F.2d at 693 . [13] See United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1213 (C.A.8, 1982) (the declarant was helping out "a friend for whom he felt responsible"). [14] For general background information see 10 Moore, Federal Practice (2d ed), Introduction, § 1-2, pp. 4-13 (general introduction), § 55, pp. 83-84 (chronology of the Federal Rules of Evidence)…
the declarant was helping out "a friend for whom he felt responsible"
green
State v. Henry (1993)
See United States v. Rodriguez, 706 F.2d 31, 40 (2d Cir.1983) (applying Rule 804(b)(3), Fed.R.Evid.); United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1213-14 (8th Cir.1982) (same); Grijalva, 137 Ariz. at 14-15 , 667 P.2d at 1340-41 .
green
United States v. Skinner (1992)
See, e.g., United States v. Porter, 881 F.2d 878, 882-83 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 944 , 110 S.Ct. 348 , 107 L.Ed.2d 336 (1989) (trial court correctly excluded statement exculpating declarant’s brother); United States v. Noel, 938 F.2d 685, 688-89 (6th Cir.1991); United States v. Silverstein, 732 F.2d 1338, 1346 (7th Cir.1984); United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1213 (8th Cir.1982).
green
Alexander v. National Farmers Organization (1986)
Indeed, the only equitable relief awarded plaintiff in this case was awarded solely as a result of this Court's determination that it was under duty to follow the Court of Appeals finding and conclusion that "NFO is plainly entitled to an injunction against the kind of unlawful conduct identified here.” Alexander v. National Farmers Organization, 687 F.2d at 1210.
green
United States v. David Joseph Longbehn (1988)
See Thompson v. Scurr, 668 F.2d 999, 1004 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 883 , 103 S.Ct. 189 , 74 L.Ed.2d 153 (1982); see also United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210 , 1215 n. 2 (8th Cir.1982).
green
United States v. Thomas E. Silverstein, Adolph Reynosa, Clayton A. Fountain, and Edgar Hevle (1984)
See, e.g., United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1213 (8th Cir.1982) (per curiam); Lyon v. State, 22 Ga. 399, 401 (1857).
green
Robert Smalley v. United States (1986)
See United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1215-16 (8th Cir.1982).
green
State v. Miller (1995)
See United States v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1215 (8th Cir.1982).
green
United States v. Green (1996)
See U.S. v. Tovar, 687 F.2d 1210, 1213 (8th Cir.1982) (exculpatory statement properly excluded where declarant knew he was going to prison for an unrelated crime and may have wished to help out a friend).