How cited: Johnson v. Darr · Go Syfert

Johnson v. Darr (1925)

green · 98 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 16 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1925 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
192519752026
green Gaona v. Gonzales (1999)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516 , 272 S.W. 1098, 1099 (1925); Resendez, 706 S.W.2d at 345 .
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Johnson v. Darr , 272 S.W. 1098, 1099 (Tex. 1925); Resendez , 706 S.W.2d at 345 .
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516 , 272 S.W. 1098, 1099 (1925). [9] By specifically naming the sixteen exceptions from disclosure, the Legislature in effect expressed its intention to make all other records discoverable.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Co., 826 S.W.2d 125, 131 (Tex.1991); Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex, 516, 520-21, 272 S.W. 1098, 1099 (1925).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Co., 826 S.W.2d 125, 131 (Tex.1991); Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516, 520-21 , 272 S.W. 1098,1099 (1925); Gaona v. Gonzales, 997 S.W.2d 784, 786 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1999, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Co., 826 S.W.2d 125, 131 (Tex. 1991); Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516 , 520–21, 272 S.W. 1098, 1099 (1925); Gaona v. Gonzalez, 997 S.W.2d 784, 786 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516 , 272 S.W. 1098, 1099 (1925); Jensen v. Bryson, 614 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex.Civ.App.—Amarillo 1981, no writ). *558 The term creditor, as used in the statute, includes a judgment creditor.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See: Ex Parte Paprskar, 573 S.W.2d 525, 528 (Tex. Crim.App.1978); Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516 , 272 S.W. 1098, 1099 (1925); Cyrus v. State, 601 S.W.2d 776, 777 (Tex.Civ.App.— Dallas 1980, writ ref’d n.r.e.). *230 Paragraph (1) of Article 55.01 requires basically that no indictment or information charging the petitioner with a felony arise out of the transaction he was arrested for or if it was presented it has been dismissed because it resulted from a mistake, false inform…
green Jensen v. Bryson (1981)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516 , 272 S.W. 1098, 1099 (1925).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516 , 272 S.W. 1098 (1925); Jensen v. Bryson, 614 S.W.2d 930 (Tex.Civ.App.--Amarillo 1981, no writ).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Johnson v. Dorr, 114 Tex. 516 , 272 S.W. 1098 , 1098 n. * (Special Sup.Ct.
Cited (see also) · Kan. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 77-514(e), (f); K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 74- 2433; L. 2014, ch. 141, sec. 2; see also Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516, 517 , 272 S.W. 1098 (1925) (noting that case was decided entirely by pro tem judges after all regularly appointed judges were disqualified).
noting that case was decided entirely by pro tem judges after all regularly appointed judges were disqualified
Cited (see also) · Kan. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 77-514(e), (f); K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 74-2433; L. 2014, ch. 141, sec. 2; see also Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516, 517 , 272 S.W. 1098 (1925) (noting that case was decided entirely by pro tem judges after all regularly appointed judges were disqualified).
noting that case was decided entirely by pro tem judges after all regularly appointed judges were disqualified
Cited (see also) · Kan. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 77-514(e), (f); K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 74- 2433; L. 2014, ch. 141, sec. 2; see also Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516, 517 , 272 S.W. 1098 (1925) (noting that case was decided entirely by pro tem judges after all regularly appointed judges were disqualified).
noting that case was decided entirely by pro tem judges after all regularly appointed judges were disqualified
Cited (see also) · Kan. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 77-514(e), (f); K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 74- 2433; L. 2014, ch. 141, sec. 2; see also Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516, 517 , 272 S.W. 1098 (1925) (noting that case was decided entirely by pro tem judges after all regularly appointed judges were disqualified).
noting that case was decided entirely by pro tem judges after all regularly appointed judges were disqualified
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516 , 272 S.W. 1098, 1099 (1925).