How cited: Margaret Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc. · Go Syfert

Margaret Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc. (1983)

green · 51 citation events across 23 courts. Showing the 31 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198320042026
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Cities, Inc., of N.M., 703 F.2d 1197, 1202 (10th Cir. 1983) (noting generally that release and waiver are affirmative defenses).
noting generally that release and waiver are affirmative defenses
green United States v. Cox (2019)
Quote Authority · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc., of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1212 (10th Cir. 1983) (“A trial court’s denial of motions or objections to rulings will not be disturbed on appeal unless it affirmatively appears that the trial court abused its discretion.”).
“A trial court’s denial of motions or objections to rulings will not be disturbed on appeal unless it affirmatively appears that the trial court abused its discretion.”
green Everhart v. Bowen (1988)
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Citing a number of cases stating that the determination of whether a suit is to be maintained as a class action is discretionary, e.g., Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc., of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1210 (10th Cir.1983), the plaintiffs argue that the court acted within its discretion in entering a statewide injunction without formally certifying a class. 6 Although the plaintiffs correctly state the law, the cases they cite simply are inapplicable.
green Everhart v. Bowen (1988)
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Citing a number of cases stating that the determination of whether a suit is to be maintained as a class action is discretionary, e.g., Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc., of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1210 (10th Cir.1983), the plaintiffs argue that the court acted within its discretion in entering a statewide injunction without formally certifying a class. 6 Although the plaintiffs correctly state the law, the cases they cite simply are inapplicable.
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc. of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1211 (10th Cir.1983).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc. of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1211 (10th Cir.1983).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc., of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1205 (10th Cir.1983); Fulton v. L & N Consultants, Inc., 715 F.2d 1413 , 1418 n. 3 (10th Cir.1982); Investors Royalty Co. v. Lewis, 185 Okl. 302 , 91 P.2d 764, 766 (1939).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc., of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1205 (10th Cir.1983); Fulton v. L & N Consultants, Inc., 715 F.2d 1413 , 1418 n. 3 (10th Cir.1982); Investors Royalty Co. v. Lewis, 185 Okl. 302 , 91 P.2d 764, 766 (1939).
green Perrong v. Vivint (2020)
Rule Authority · D. Utah · 2 citations in this opinion
Cities, Inc., of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1210 (10th Cir. 1983), but not under Rule 12(b)(6).
Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio · 2 citations in this opinion
Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc. of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1209 (10th Cir.1983); Dreisbach v. Murphy, 658 F.2d 720, 730 (9th Cir.1981). (7) Defendants have established a nexus to interstate commerce sufficient to warrant jurisdiction over their antitrust defense and counterclaim under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 .
Rule Authority · D. Utah
Cities, Inc., of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1209 (10th Cir. 1983) (“We recognize that private litigants cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the district courts by alleging violations of business practices proscribed by 15 U.S.C.A. § 45 (a)(1).”; see also Am.
“We recognize that private litigants cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the district courts by alleging violations of business practices proscribed by 15 U.S.C.A. § 45 (a)(1).”; see also Am. Airlines v. Christensen, 967 F.2d 410 , 414 (10th Cir. 1992
Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.
Cities, Inc., of N.M., 703 F.2d 1197, 1209 (10th Cir. 1983); J.R. v. Walgreens Boots All., Inc., No. 20-1767, 2021 WL 4859703 , at *8 (4th Cir. Oct. 19, 2021) (collecting cases). 6 Davenport Auto Park admits that it extended credit to plaintiff’s late husband when he purchased the truck in 2019.
Quote Authority · E.D.N.C.
Cities, Inc., of N.M., 703 F.2d 1197 , 1209 (10th Cir. 1983) (“[P]rivate litigants cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the district courts by alleging violations of business practices proscribed by 15 U.S.C.A. § 45 (a)(1).”); ZR. v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., No. 20-1767, 2021 WL 4859603 , at (4th Cir. Oct. 19, 2021) (noting that “[t]hough we have not yet addressed this issue, other Circuits have uniformly found the FTCA does not contain an implied private right of action…
“[P]rivate litigants cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the district courts by alleging violations of business practices proscribed by 15 U.S.C.A. § 45 (a)(1).”
Quote Authority · D.S.C.
However, there is no private right of action to enforce this provision. ., 703 F.2d 1197 , 1209 (10th Cir. 1983) (“[P]rivate litigants cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the district courts by alleging violations of business practices proscribed by 15 U.S.C.A. § 45 (a)(1).”); , No. 20-1767, 2021 WL 4859603 , at *8 (4th Cir. 2021 Oct. 19, 2021) (unpublished) (noting that “[t]hough we have not yet addressed this issue, other Circuits have uniformly found the FTCA does not conta…
“[P]rivate litigants cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the district courts by alleging violations of business practices proscribed by 15 U.S.C.A. § 45 (a)(1).”
green COLE v. MONTGOMERY (2023)
Quote Authority · M.D.N.C.
Cities, Inc., of N.M., 703 F.2d 1197 , 1209 (10th Cir. 1983) (“[P]rivate litigants cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the district courts by alleging violations of business practices proscribed by 15 U.S.C.A. § 45 (a)(1).”); J.R. v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., No. 20- 1767, 2021 WL 4859603 , at *8 (4th Cir. 2021 Oct. 19, 2021) (unpublished) (noting that “[t]hough we have not yet addressed this issue, other Circuits have uniformly found the FTCA does not contain an implied…
“[P]rivate litigants cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the district courts by alleging violations of business practices proscribed by 15 U.S.C.A. § 45 (a)(1).”
green Strobel v. Rusch (2020)
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
Cities, Inc., of N.M., 703 F.2d 1197, 1205 (10th Cir. 1983) (citing Young v. Thomas, 604 P.2d 370 (N.M. 1979)). “[T]he parol evidence rule does not forbid two contemporaneous contracts, one written and one oral, with respect to the same subject matter, providing the two can be made to stand together without the oral contract affecting the integrity of the written one.” Id. ). “[C]ontracting parties have the power to reduce some portions of their total contract to writing and…
citing Young v. Thomas, 604 P.2d 370 (N.M. 1979)
Rule Authority · D. Utah
“Class wide issues predominate if resolution of some of the legal or factual questions that qualify each class member’s case as a genuine controversy can be achieved through generalized proof, and if these particular issues are more substantial than the issues subject to only individualized proof.” Id.5 “Claims alleging 5 See also Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc. of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1210 (10th Cir. 1983) (Upholding district court’s order granting motion to dismis…
Rule Authority
Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc., of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1209 (10th Cir.1983).
Rule Authority
Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc., of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1209 (10th Cir.1983).
green Trujillo v. Gonzales (1987)
Rule Authority · N.M.
Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc. of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1206 (10th Cir.1983).
Rule Authority · Bankr.D. Colo.
Ultimately the motion invokes the sound discretion of the trial court, and appellate review of its ruling is quite limited. [Footnotes omitted.] See Brownlow v. Aman, 740 F.2d 1476 (10th Cir.1984); Baum v. Great Western Cities Inc. of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1211 (10th Cir.1983); Rodgers v. Hyatt, 697 F.2d 899, 901 (10th Cir.1983); Trotter v. Todd, 719 F.2d 346 (10th Cir.1983); Thompson v. Kerr-McGee Refining Corporation, 660 F.2d 1380 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U…
Rule Authority · Bankr. D.N.M.
Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc. of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1205 (10th Cir.1983).
green Akers v. Bonifasi (1985)
Rule Authority · M.D. Tenn.
Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc. of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1209 [12] (10th Cir.1983); Dreisbach v. Murphy, 658 F.2d 720, 730 (9th Cir.1981); Fulton v. Hecht, 580 F.2d 1243 , *1222 1249, n. 2[5] (5th Cir.1978); Alfred Dunhill Limited v. Interstate Cigar Company, Inc., 499 F.2d 232, 237 [3] (2d Cir.1974); Holloway v. Bristol-Myers Corporation, 485 F.2d 986, 988-992 [1] (D.C.Cir.1973); contra: Guernsey v. Rich Plan of the Midwest, 408 F.Supp. 582 (D.C.Ind.1976).
Rule Authority · W.D. Okla.
In Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc. of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1212 (10th Cir.1983) the court stated that “constructive fraud arises only when there exists a special confidential or fiduciary relation between the parties to a transaction or contract.” The plaintiff bears a heavy burden in proving a constructive trust (Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Hardin, 404 F.Supp. 961, 963 (W.D.Okla., 1974)).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc., 703 F.2d 1197 , 1210-11 (10th Cir.1983) ("Questions of intent which involve intangible factors, including witness credibility, are matters for consideration of [the] fact finder after a full trial.").
Cited (see also) · D. Kan. · signal: see also
May 16, 2018); see also Molock, 952 F.3d at 303 (Silberman, J., dissenting) (discussing that a party can move to dismiss class allegations if the named plaintiff’s claim of entitlement to represent a class is defective as a matter of law); see also Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc., 703 F.2d 1197 , 1210 (10th Cir. 1983) (finding trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a motion to dismiss the class action).
finding trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a motion to dismiss the class action
Cited · S.D. Ill. · signal: see
See Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc. of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1209 (10th Cir. 1983); Meyer v. Bell & Howell Co., 453 F.Supp. 801, 802 (E.D.
Cited (see also) · D.P.R. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc., 703 F.2d 1197 , 1209 (10th Cir.1983).
green Tacker v. Wilson (1993)
Cited · W.D. Tenn. · signal: see
See, Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc., 703 F.2d 1197 (10th Cir.1983); Dreisbach v. Murphy, 658 F.2d 720 (9th Cir.1981); Fulton v. Hecht, 580 F.2d 1243 , reh'g denied, 585 F.2d 520 (5th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 1789 , 60 L.Ed.2d 241 (1979).
Cited (see also) · D. Mass. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc. of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1209 (10th Cir.1983).
green McBirney v. Autrey (1985)
Cited · N.D. Tex. · signal: see
See Baum v. Great Western Cities, Inc. of New Mexico, 703 F.2d 1197, 1210 (10th Cir.1983).