How cited: Conxall Corporation v. Iconn Systems, LLC · Go Syfert

Conxall Corporation v. Iconn Systems, LLC (2016)

green · 19 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 5
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Savis, Inc. v. Khoury (2023)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Id., ¶ 35. ¶ 94 On the other hand, Justices Rochford and Hoffman agreed that the term “bad faith” “should be given the preexisting definition of ‘bad faith’ ” of this state.” Concall Corp. v. Iconn Systems, LLC, 2016 IL App (1st) 140158, ¶ 95 (Rochford, J., specially concurring, joined by Hoffman, J.).
green Multimedia Sales & Marketing, Inc. v. Marzullo (2020)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jan. 1, 2018) states in relevant part, “The signature of an attorney or party constitutes a certificate by him that *** it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good-faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and that it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.” “[T]he purpose of Rule 137 is to penalize claimants who br…
green Multimedia Sales & Marketing, Inc. v. Marzullo (2020)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Jan. 1, 2018) states in relevant part, “The signature of an attorney or party constitutes a certificate by him that *** it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good-faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and that it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.” “[T]he purpose of Rule 137 is to penalize claimants who br…
green Abrasic 90 Inc.v. Weldcote Metals, Inc. (2019)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Oct. 16, 2009) (concluding that plaintiff failed to protect alleged trade secrets because plaintiff did not require confidentiality agreements or label information confidential); Conxall Corp. v. Iconn Sys., LLC, 61 N.E.3d 1081, 1093 (Ill.
holding that where plaintiff could not prove it had a confidentiality agreement, “its trade secret claim . . . suffered a total failure of proof as to a critical element, namely that the designs were a trade secret”
green In re Commitment of Echols (2025)
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Conxall Corp., 2016 IL App (1st) 140158, ¶ 19 (instruction must state the law fairly and distinctly and must not mislead the jury). - 30 - No. 1-23-0519 ¶ 101 The trial court did not abuse its discretion in instructing the jury that os-paraphilic disorder was a generally accepted diagnosis, and in rejecting some of respondent’s instructions about general acceptance. ¶ 102 3.