How cited: D.E. v. Department of the Navy, MSPB · Go Syfert

D.E. v. Department of the Navy, MSPB (1983)

green · 13 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sec. 7703 (c), "which provides that this court shall review the record and hold unlawful any agency action which we find to be arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion; procedurally defective; or unsupported by substantial evidence." D.E. v. Department of the Navy, 721 F.2d 1165, 1166 (9th Cir.), modified, 722 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
III. 18 We review the Board's decision to determine if it is "arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion; procedurally defective; or unsupported by substantial evidence." D.E. v. Dept. of the Navy, 721 F.2d 1165, 1166 (9th Cir.), amended, 722 F.2d 455 (1983).
Cited · Fed. Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See D.E. v. Department of the Navy, MSPB, 721 F.2d 1165, 1169 (9th Cir.1983) (Navy employee convicted of child molestation; Navy's conclusory claims of distrust of employee insufficient to support subsequent discharge of employee).
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., D.E. v. Department of the Navy, 721 F.2d 1165 (9th Cir.1983) (removal for sexual abuse of seven-year-old daughter reversed); McLeod v. Department of the Army, 714 F.2d 918 (9th Cir.1983) (removal for possession of marijuana reversed) 3 ; Young v. Hampton, 568 F.2d 1253 (7th Cir.1977) (dismissal for possession of controlled substance reversed).
Cited (see also) · Conn. · signal: compare
Compare D.E. v. Dept. of the Navy, MSPB, 721 F.2d 1165, 1166 (9th Cir.) (court shall ‘‘hold unlawful any agency action which we find to be arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion; procedurally defective; or unsupported by substantial evidence’’), amended, 722 F.2d 455 (9th Cir. 1983); McLeod v. Dept. of the Army, 714 F.2d 918, 922 (9th Cir. 1983) (reviewing agency action under arbitrary and capricious standard); Young v. Hampton, 568 F.2d 1253, 1257 (7th Cir. 1977) …