Bingham, Ltd. v. United States (1984)

green · 88 citation events across 26 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 50

Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

198420052026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Douglas L. Adams and Gary M. Piccirillo, Ronnie McKane v. Rodrick James, Henry Ziegler, Jr., Don Merritt, J.F… (1986)

Rule Authority · 11th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

Bingham Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Esther Yang v. Dongwon Industries Co. (2017)

Quote Authority · 9th Cir.

Cir. 2008) (“[W]hen a modifier is set off from 'a series of antecedents by a comma, the modifier should be read to apply to each of those antecedents.”) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Kahn Lucas, 186 F.3d at 215 ); Stepnowski v. Comm’r, 456 F.3d 320, 324 (3d Cir. 2006) (“[W]here there is a comma before a modifying phrase, that phrase modifies all of the items in a series and not just the immediately preceding item.”); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921…

“Where the modifier is set off from two or more antecedents by a comma, ... the comma indicates the drafter’s intent that the modifier relate to more than the last antecedent.”

green Kent Anderson v. Donald Hodel, Secretary of the Interior (1990)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

See, also, Shahid v. Gulf Power Co., 291 F.2d 422, 429 (5th Cir.1961), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 923 , 82 S.Ct. 1563 , 8 L.Ed.2d 503 (1962) (“Without intimating any conclusion on the merits ..., we nevertheless conclude that it is the part of good judicial administration for the facts in this to be more fully developed before the trial *771 court determines that there is truly no genuine issue as to any material fact.”); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 927 (11th C…

green United States v. Henry Carter, A/K/A A.B. Lay A/K/A Prince, Tracy Lynn Jones, and Sheila Marie O'Meara (1988)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Appellant argues that this instruction was error, because it violated the interpretive principle that “ambiguity concerning the ambit of criminal statutes should be resolved in favor of lenity.” Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924-925 (11th Cir.1984).

green Crockett v. Uniroyal, Inc. (1985)

Rule Authority · 11th Cir.

Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Jeremiah Crockett v. Uniroyal, Inc., Southern Railway Co., Seaboard System Railroad, Inc., Etc., Southern Rai… (1985)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green United States v. William Wesley Pruitt, A/K/A Buddy Pruitt, Kim Curtis Danner (1985)

Rule Authority · 11th Cir.

Appellant argues that this instruction was error, because it violated the interpretive principle that “ambiguity concerning the ambit of criminal statutes should be resolved in favor of lenity.” Bingham, Ltd v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924-925 (11th Cir.1984).

green Parker v. Tricam Industries, Inc. (2025)

Rule Authority · M.D. Ala.

Jean-Baptiste v. Gutierrez, 627 F.3d 816, 820 (11th Cir. 2010); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir. 1984) (citation omitted).

citation omitted

green Ross v. Knauf Insulation, Inc. (2024)

Rule Authority · M.D. Ala.

Jean-Baptiste v. Gutierrez, 627 F.3d 816, 820 (11th Cir. 2010); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir. 1984).

green Weatherington v. Dothan City Board of Education (2020)

Rule Authority · M.D. Ala.

See, e.g., Jean-Baptiste v. Gutierrez, 627 F.3d 816, 820 (11th Cir. 2010); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir. 1984).

green Thomas v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company (2020)

Rule Authority · M.D. Ala.

Jean-Baptiste v. Gutierrez, 627 F.3d 816, 820 (11th Cir. 2010); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir. 1984).

green Smith v. Office of the Attorney General, State of Alabama (2020)

Rule Authority · M.D. Ala.

E.g., Jean-Baptiste v. Gutierrez, 627 F.3d 816, 820 (11th Cir. 2010); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir. 1984).

green Veolia Water North America Operating Services LLC v. SSAB Alabama Inc (2019)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ala.

“Disposition of a summary judgment motion in a declaratory judgment action is governed by the same basic principles that generally rule the grant or denial of such a motion.” Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir. 1984). 5 In the meantime, upon consent of both parties, the court released Veolia from its December 18, 2015 order requiring it to post a surety bond.

green Davila-Lynch v. HOSOPO Corporation (2019)

Quote Authority · D. Mass.

When a comma is included, . . . the modifier is generally understood to apply to the entire series.”); Stepnowski v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 456 F.3d 320, 324 (3d Cir. 2006) (“[W]here there is a comma before a modifying phrase, that phrase modifies all of the items in a series and not just the immediately preceding item.”); Yang v. Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC, 876 F.3d 996, 1000 (9th Cir. 2017); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 925-26, n. 3 (11th Cir.…

“Where the modifier is set off from two or more antecedents by a comma, . . . the comma indicates the drafter’s intent that the modifier relate to more than the last antecedent.”

green Gonzalez v. Hosopo Corp. (2019)

Quote Authority · D.D.C.

When a comma is included, ... the modifier is generally understood to apply to the entire series."); Stepnowski v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 456 F.3d 320 , 324 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[W]here there is a comma before a modifying phrase, that phrase modifies all of the items in a series and not just the immediately preceding item."); Yang v. Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC , 876 F.3d 996 , 1000 (9th Cir. 2017) ; Bingham, Ltd. v. United States , 724 F.2d 921 , 925-26, n. 3 (11th…

"Where the modifier is set off from two or more antecedents by a comma, ... the comma indicates the drafter's intent that the modifier relate to more than the last antecedent."

green Horton v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co. (2017)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ala.

“Disposition of a summary judgment motion in a- declaratory judgment action is governed by the same basic principles that generally rule the grant or denial of such a motion.” Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir. 1984). , The party moving for summary, judgment “always bears the initial responsibility of informing the district court of the basis for its motion,” relying on submissions “which it believes demonstrate the absence of a genuine issue of mat…

green Phillips v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (2015)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 175 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Finder v. John Marshall Law School, LLC (2014)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 175 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Bernstein v. Georgia Department of Education (2013)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 175 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Soloski v. Adams (2009)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 175 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Edwards v. Niagara Credit Solutions, Inc. (2008)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 175 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Richardson v. Jackson (2008)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 175 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Thomas v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. (2007)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 175 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Kimsey v. Akstein (2005)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 175 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Smith v. Akstein (2005)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 175 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Hudson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (2001)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 175 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green McAfee v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance (2000)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 156 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green McLeod v. United Presidential Life Insurance (2000)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 156 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Ferguson v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. (2000)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 156 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green NBA Properties, Inc. v. Dahlonega Mint, Inc. (1998)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Cross v. Southwest Recreational Industries, Inc. (1998)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Frix v. Florida Tile Industries, Inc. (1997)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Rress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green State of Ga. v. City of East Ridge, Tenn. (1996)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Armuchee Alliance v. King (1996)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Rich v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. (1996)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 156 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Galen Health Care, Inc. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading (1996)

Rule Authority · M.D. Fla.

Summary judgment is inappropriate where there are material factual issues in dispute or the movant fails to “furnish an adequate basis for the court to apply the proper legal principles in resolving a difficult question of law.” Bingham, Ltd. v. United States of America, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Fowler v. Sunrise Carpet Industries, Inc. (1996)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Taylor v. Espy (1993)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Kenney v. Shaw Industries, Inc. (1991)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green United States v. All That Tract or Parcel of Land (1991)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green International Raw Materials, Ltd. v. Stauffer Chemical Co. (1989)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

See Docket No. 20 at 2-4; Docket No. 18 at 1-3 (quoting Bingham Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984) (reversing summary judgment); Security Pacific National Bank v. OL.s.

green E.T. Barwick Industries, Inc. v. Walter E. Heller & Co. (1987)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir. *1336 1984).

green Patterson v. Fuller (1987)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Abernathy v. City of Cartersville, Ga. (1986)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Bingham Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Bates v. Cook, Inc. (1984)

Rule Authority · M.D. Fla.

Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green Ray v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb, Inc. (1984)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.

Rule 56(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.; Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1984).

green American Federation Of Government Employees, Afl-Cio Local 2152 v. Principi (2006)

Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see

See Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 926 (11th Cir.1984).

green American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO Local 2152 v. Principi (2006)

Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see

See Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921, 926 (11th Cir.1984).

green Kahn Lucas Lancaster, Inc. v. Lark International Ltd. (1999)

Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see

See Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921 , 925-26 n. 3 (11th Cir.1984); see also Elliot Coal Mining Co. v. Director, Office of Workers’ Comp.

green Page v. Regions Bank (2012)

Cited · N.D. Ala. · signal: see

See Bingham, Ltd. v. United States, 724 F.2d 921 , 926 n. 3 (11th Cir.1984).