How cited: Cluster 433059 · Go Syfert

Cluster 433059 (1984)

green · 132 citation events across 15 courts. Showing the 46 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198420052026
Rule Authority · 6th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Donovan v. Hayden, Stone, Inc., 434 F.2d 619 (6th Cir.1970); Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 215 (5th Cir.1984).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 219 (5th Cir.1984); Phillips, 632 F.2d at 86-87 .
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 219 (5th Cir.1984); Phillips, 632 F.2d at 86-87 .
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See McClelland Engineers, Inc. v. Munusamy, 784 F.2d 1313, 1317 (5th Cir.1986); James v. Gulf Int'l Marine, 777 F.2d 193 , 194 (5th Cir.1985); Cuevas v. Reading & Bates Drilling Co., 770 F.2d 1371, 1377-78 (5th Cir.1985); Ali v. Offshore Co., 753 F.2d 1327, 1330 (5th Cir.1985); Nicol v. Gulf Fleet Supply Vessels, Inc., 743 F.2d 289, 292-93 (5th Cir.1984); In re McClelland Engineers, Inc., 742 F.2d 837, 838 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1228 , 105 S.Ct. 1228 , 84 L.E…
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See McClelland Engineers, Inc. v. Munusamy, 784 F.2d 1313, 1317 (5th Cir.1986); James v. Gulf Int'l Marine, 777 F.2d 193 , 194 (5th Cir. 1985); Cuevas v. Reading & Bates Drilling Co., 770 F.2d 1371, 1377-78 (5th Cir.1985); Ali v. Offshore Co., 753 F.2d 1327, 1330 (5th Cir.1985); Nicol v. Gulf Fleet Supply Vessels, Inc., 743 F.2d 289, 292-93 (5th Cir.1984); In re McClelland Engineers, Inc., 742 F.2d 837, 838 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1228 , 105 S.Ct. 1228 , 84 L.…
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 219 (5th Cir.1984); Phillips, 632 F.2d at 86-87 .
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 219 (5th Cir.1984); Phillips, 632 F.2d at 86-87 .
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Cuevas v. Reading & Bates Corp., 770 F.2d 1371 (5th Cir.1985); Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 218 (5th Cir.1984); De Oliveira v. Delta Marine Drilling Co., 707 F.2d 843, 845 (5th Cir.1983); Fisher v. Agios Nicolaos V, 628 F.2d 308 , 315 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, sub nom.
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 214 (5th Cir.1984); Save the Bay, Inc. v. United States Army, 639 F.2d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir.1981).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 219-220 (5th Cir.1984).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 214 (5th Cir.1984); Save the Bay, Inc. v. United States Army, 639 F.2d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir.1981).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
The order was final because the conditions the court imposed, like those in Picco, merely protected the appellants by allowing them to refile in federal court, “without penalty, if the defendant balks in the foreign forum.” Id. at 218.
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
In a number of cases, this Court has held that conditional forum non conveniens dismissals are final, despite the fact that “the orders may literally appear to have more typically nonfinal characteristics . . . [b]ecause they are conditional.” Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 216 (5th Cir. 1984), overruled on other grounds by Trivelloni-Lorenzi v. Pan Am.
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
In a number of cases, this Court has held that conditional forum non conveniens dismissals are final, despite the fact that “the orders may literally appear to have more typically nonfinal characteristics . . . [b]ecause they are conditional.” Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 216 (5th Cir. 1984), overruled on other grounds by Trivelloni-Lorenzi v. Pan Am.
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
For example, in Koke, this Court held that a dismissal order was final, even though it "was conditioned on three requisites: (1) that all defendants consent to jurisdiction in a single appropriate foreign forum; (2) that all defendants waive any defense regarding the statute of limitations; and (3) that all defendants consent to satisfying any judgment rendered by such court.” 730 F.2d at 214.
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
See Zipfel v. Halliburton Co., 832 F.2d 1477, 1483 (9th Cir.1987) (law of the flag accorded less weight when vessel was a floating oil drilling rig which “was unable to move under its own power, had to be towed by other vessels when moved, and had remained for long periods of time prior to the accident at only a few drilling locations”); 9 Cuevas v. Reading & Bates Corp., 770 F.2d 1371, 1373, 1379 (5th Cir.1985) (same, involving a semi-stationary, jack-up drilling ship); Kok…
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
See Zipfel v. Halliburton Co., 832 F.2d 1477, 1483 (9th Cir.1987) (law of the flag accorded less weight when vessel was a floating oil drilling rig which "was unable to move under its own power, had to be towed by other vessels when moved, and had remained for long periods of time prior to the accident at only a few drilling locations"); 9 Cuevas v. Reading & Bates Corp., 770 F.2d 1371, 1373, 1379 (5th Cir.1985) (same, involving a semi-stationary, jack-up drilling ship); Kok…
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
This court has held that the appealability of an order “normally depends on its effect, not merely its language as such.” Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 216 (5th Cir.1984), rev’d on other grounds, In re Air Crash Disaster Near New Orleans, La., 821 F.2d 1147 , 1163 n. 3 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
We held in Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 216 (5th Cir.1984), that a conditional dismissal on forum non conveniens grounds was an appeal-able final order even though a failure to comply with the conditions of the dismissal could result in the district court’s reassertion of jurisdiction.
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
See Linn v. Chivatero, 714 F.2d 1278, 1280 (5th Cir.1983); Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 216 (5th Cir.1984). 7 21 In any event, should we lack appellate jurisdiction, we would nevertheless have jurisdiction to grant the Committee's petition for writ of mandamus.
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
See Linn v. Chivatero, 714 F.2d 1278, 1280 (5th Cir.1983); Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 216 (5th Cir.1984). 7 In any event, should we lack appellate jurisdiction, we would nevertheless have jurisdiction to grant the Committee’s petition for writ of mandamus.
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 214 (5th Cir.1984). 31 The question of the finality and appealability of orders prior to a ruling on attorney's fees has proved to be a difficult one in our circuit due to the case-by-case approach we use.
green Cobb v. Miller (1987)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 214 (5th Cir. 1984).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
The only reference made by the parties to jurisdiction is in Newball’s and Offshore's Statement of Jurisdiction wherein they each state that jurisdiction is based on section 1291. ‘This court, however, has the duty to examine the basis of its jurisdiction, and by its own motion if necessary.” Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 214 (5th Cir.1984).
green Parks v. Collins (1985)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 214 (5th Cir.1984), cited in United States v. Garner, 749 F.2d 281, 284 (5th Cir.1985). .
green Parks v. Collins (1985)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 214 (5th Cir.1984), cited in United States v. Garner, 749 F.2d 281, 284 (5th Cir.1985) 4 Miss.Code Ann.
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
See, e.g., United States v. Garner, 749 F.2d 281, 284 (5th Cir.1985); Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 214 (5th Cir.1984).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Our most recent pronouncement regarding the standard of review for choice of law in Jones Act/general maritime law cases is contained in Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 218 (5th Cir. 1984): Before dismissing a case for forum non conveniens, a court must first determine whether American or foreign *293 law governs that claim.
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Defendants contend that “there obviously has not been any final outcome in the underlying case, so any malpractice lawsuit relating to how the attorneys handled the venue arguments is premature, and must be either dismissed or abated.”1 Yet, the underlying United States case was dismissed with Judge Ward’s April 20, 2011 order dismissing the case on forum non conveniens grounds.2 In the Fifth Circuit, “[d]ismissals for forum non conveniens … have been considered final and ap…
emphasis added
Rule Authority · N.D. Cal. · 2 citations in this opinion
Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d at 220; Vaz Borralho v. Keydril Co., 696 F.2d at 389 .
Rule Authority · E.D. La. · 2 citations in this opinion
This “fact alone can be paramount, compelling a finding of American law.” Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 218 (5th Cir.1984) (citing Lauritzen, 345 U.S. at 585 , 73 S.Ct. at 929 ).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
On July 9, 1982, 821 F.2d 1147 , 1163-64 n. 25 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc); Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 213, 218-20 (5th Cir.1984) (holding that the law of Norway applied to personal-injury claims brought by British citizens injured in the territorial waters of Norway while working aboard a vessel owned by a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Dallas, Texas), overruled on other grounds by In re Air Crash Disaster Near New Orleans, La.
Rule Authority · D. Mass.
Zipfel, 832 F.2d at 1483 ; Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 219 (5th Cir.1984), overruled, on other *65 grounds, In re Air Crash Disaster Near New Orleans, La., 821 F.2d 1147 (5th Cir.1987) (en.banc).
Rule Authority · W.D. La.
Id. at 292-93 , quoting Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 218 (5th Cir.1984).
Rule Authority · Temp. Emerg. Ct. App.
Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 214 (5th Cir.1984); Ross v. Inter-Ocean Ins.
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 214 (5th Cir.1984).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211 (5th Cir.1984).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211 (5th Cir.1984).
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also
See Phillips v. Amoco Trinidad Oil Co., 632 F.2d 82, 87 (9th Cir.1980) (Phillips), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1999 , 68 L.Ed.2d 312 (1981); see also Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 219-20 (5th Cir.1984) (Koke); Chiazor v. Transworld Drilling Co., 648 F.2d 1015, 1018-19 (5th Cir.1981) (Chiazor), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1019 , 102 S.Ct. 1714 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also
See Phillips v. Amoco Trinidad Oil Co., 632 F.2d 82, 87 (9th Cir.1980) (Phillips ), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 1999 , 68 L.Ed.2d 312 (1981); see also Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 219-20 (5th Cir.1984) (Koke ); Chiazor v. Transworld Drilling Co., 648 F.2d 1015, 1018-19 (5th Cir.1981) (Chiazor ), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1019 , 102 S.Ct. 1714 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982). 11 The corporations allege that the place of injury is significant since the deceden…
green Ali v. Offshore Co. (1985)
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211 (5th Cir.1984); De Oliveira v. Delta Marine Drilling Co., 707 F.2d 843 (5th Cir.1983); Bailey v. Dolphin International, Inc., 697 F.2d 1268 (5th Cir.1983); Vaz Borralho v. Keydril Co., 696 F.2d 379 (5th Cir.1983); Chiazor v. Transworld Drilling Co., 648 F.2d 1015 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1019 , 102 S.Ct. 1714 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982); Zekic v. Reading & Bates Drilling Co., 536 F.Supp. 23 (E.D.
Cited · Del. Super. Ct. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 5th Cir., 730 F.2d 211 (1948).
Cited · E.D. La. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 219 (5th Cir. 1984). 17 .
green Matter of Jaques (1997)
Cited · E.D. Tex. · signal: see
See Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 214 (5th Cir.1984).
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Koke v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 730 F.2d 211, 220 (5th Cir.1984); Rivera v. Offshore Crews, Inc., 595 F. Supp. 628 , 629 n. 3 (E.D.La. 1984). [5] The distinction drawn by the cases as to the importance of the "base of operations" factor between vessels like the M/S Southward and special purpose structures such as a submersible drilling rig, see Bailey, 697 F.2d at 1274-75 ; Chiazor v. Transworld Drilling Co., 648 F.2d 1015 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1019 , 10
green Regan v. Regan (1987)
Cited (see also) · Miss. · signal: see also
Several cases which may or may not afford guidance upon remand are American Export Lines, Inc. v. Alvez, 446 U.S. 274 , 100 S.Ct. 1673 , 64 L.Ed.2d 284 (1980) (wife's action for loss of society arising from husband's nonfatal injuries held authorized under general maritime law); Tullos v. Resource Drilling, Inc., 750 F.2d 380, 385-86 (5th Cir.1985) (wife has claim for loss of consortium under general maritime law but not under Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688 ); Beltia v. Sideny T…