How cited: Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corporation v. D & L Camp Construction Comp… · Go Syfert

Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corporation v. D & L Camp Construction Company, Inc. (1984)

green · 63 citation events across 20 courts. Showing the 15 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198420052026
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Corp. v. D & L Camp Construction Co., Inc., 738 F.2d 999, 1000 (9th Cir. 1984) (legislative history of ERISA revealed no Congressional intent to "expand the concept of employer . . . to include 27 sureties, whose obligations are fixed by contract and regulated by state law for the protection of the public").
legislative history of ERISA revealed no Congressional intent to "expand the concept of employer . . . to include 27 sureties, whose obligations are fixed by contract and regulated by state law for the protection of the public"
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Id. at 1000.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Id. at 1000.
Rule Authority · 11th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
News 4639, nor of its 1980 amendments, see 1980 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News 2918, indicate that Congress meant to expand the concept of employer or the jurisdiction of the federal courts to include sureties, whose obligations are fixed by contract and regulated by state law for the protection of the public.” 820 F.2d at 1179 (quoting Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corp. v. D & L Camp Construction Co., 738 F.2d 999, 1000-01 (9th Cir.1984)).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Any obligation of the surety to this plaintiff is founded in state, not federal law. 738 F.2d at 1000-1001.
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
Corp. v. D & L Camp Construction Co., Inc., 738 F.2d 999, 1000 (9th Cir.1984) (legislative history of ERISA revealed no Congressional intent to "expand the concept of employer ... to include sureties, whose obligations are fixed by contract and regulated by state law for the protection of the public"). 73 The Eleventh Circuit has emphasized that sureties who are not signatories to the collective bargaining agreement between the employer and the claimants do not fall within t…
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
The Xaros court agreed with the Ninth Circuit that 10 "[n]either the legislative history of ERISA, see 1974 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News 4639, nor of its 1980 amendments, see 1980 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News 2918, indicate that Congress meant to expand the concept of employer or the jurisdiction of the federal courts to include sureties, whose obligations are fixed by contract and regulated by state law for the protection of the public." 11 820 F.2d at 1179 (quoting Carpenters Sout…
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y. · 2 citations in this opinion
Carpenters, 738 F.2d at 1001.
Rule Authority · D. Conn.
The Greenblatt court also acknowledged that the facts in Carpenters “‘could create a galaxy of problems arising under California law,’ including compliance with various other California statutes and the union’s position in relation to the claims of other claimants on the bond.” Id. at 629 (quoting Carpenters, 738 F.2d at 1000).
green Santella v. Grishaber (1987)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Camp Construction Co., 738 F.2d 999, 1000 (9th Cir.1984)), our Court of Appeals has approved the exercise of pendent party jurisdiction under certain conditions (see, e.g., Moore, 754 F.2d at 1359 (Posner, J., concurring and dissenting in part); id. at 1361 (Gibson, J., concurring and dissenting in part)).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
For a recent restatement of its refusal to recognize pendent party jurisdiction, see Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corp. v. D & L Camp Construction Co., 738 F.2d 999, 1000 (9th Cir.1984). 3 .
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Pendent Party Jurisdiction Despite the doctrine’s arguably shaky constitutional underpinnings (see Moore v. Marketplace Restaurant, Inc., 754 F.2d 1336, 1359-60 (7th Cir.1985) (Posner, J., dissenting and concurring in part)) and contrary authority in other circuits (see, e.g., Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corp. v. D & L Camp Construction Co., 738 F.2d 999, 1000 (9th Cir.1984) 9 ), our Court of Appeals has consistently approved the exercise of pendent party j…
Rule Authority · C.D. Cal.
Co. Inc., 738 F.2d 999, 1000 (9th Cir.1984); Safeco Ins.
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corp. v. D & L Camp Construction Co., 738 F.2d 999, 1000-01 (9th Cir.1984).
Cited · Conn. Super. Ct. · signal: see
See Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corp. v. D L Camp Construction Co., Inc. , 738 F.2d 999 , 1000 (9th Cir. 1984).