How cited: United States v. Oscar W. Wesley and Velma Cooper · Go Syfert

United States v. Oscar W. Wesley and Velma Cooper (1984)

green · 33 citation events across 9 courts. Showing the 18 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198520052026
But See · 8th Cir. · signal: but cf. · 4 citations in this opinion
But cf. United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d at 964 (holding that “urging and advising” a witness to testify falsely is prohibited by § 1512 and § 1503; unclear from published opinion whether there was intimidation or misleading conduct or whether there was a pending judicial proceeding at the time); United States v. Hernandez, 730 F.2d at 897-99 (holding that threatening a potential witness violates only § 1512; unclear whether there was a pending judicial proceeding at the ti…
But See · 9th Cir. · signal: but cf.
But cf. United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 964 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1130 , 105 S.Ct. 2664 , 86 L.Ed.2d 281 (1985) (holding that “urging and advising” witness to testify falsely violates section 1512 without indicating whether there was intimidation or misleading conduct).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 963 (5th Cir. 1984).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Wesley, 748 F.2d at 963 (emphasis added).
emphasis added
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
See United States v. Branch, 850 F.2d 1080, 1082 (5th Cir.1988); United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 964 (5th Cir.1984).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 964 (5th Cir.1984). 3.
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
United States v. Lester, 749 F.2d 1288, 1292-95 (9th Cir.1984); United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 964-65 (5th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1130 , 105 S.Ct. 2664 , 86 L.Ed.2d 281 (1985); United States v. Hernandez, 730 F.2d 895, 898-99 (2d Cir.1984).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
See United States v. King, 762 F.2d 232, 238 (2d Cir. 1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1203 , 89 L.Ed.2d 316 (1986); United States v. Lester, 749 F.2d 1288, 1295 (9th Cir.1984); United States v. Risken, 788 F.2d 1361, 1368 (8th Cir.) ("§ 1512 prohibits only specific types of conduct — intimidation, physical force, threats or attempts to do so, misleading conduct, or harassment"), cert.. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 329 , 93 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986); United States v. Dawlett,…
green State v. Wiley (2007)
Rule Authority · Vt.
Encouraging a potential witness to lie under oath fits within the charged crime of “corruptly endeavoring] to obstruct or impede the due administration of justice.” See United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 964 (5th Cir. 1984) (affirming conviction under federal omnibus clause for “urging and advising” a witness to testify falsely).
affirming conviction under federal omnibus clause for “urging and advising” a witness to testify falsely
green State v. Wiley (2007)
Rule Authority · Vt.
Encouraging a potential witness to lie under oath fits within the charged crime of "corruptly endeavor[ing] to obstruct or impede the due administration of justice." See United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 964 (5th Cir.1984) (affirming conviction under federal omnibus clause for "urging and advising" a witness to testify falsely).
green Garcia v. Wash (1994)
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 963 (5th Cir.1984) The places at which the published opinion omits parts of the lengthy unpublished opinion are indicated by asterisks.
green Garcia v. Wash (1994)
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 963 (5th Cir.1984).
green Garcia v. Wash (1994)
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 963 (5th Cir. 1984).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
Section 1512 “reaches only certain specifically enumerated types of witness tampering; other types of conduct, no matter how morally reprehensible, are not prohibited by the statute.” United States v. Dawlett, 787 F.2d 771, 775 (1st Cir.1986); see generally United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 964 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962 (5th Cir.1984).
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 964-65 (5th Cir.1984) (finding that defendant was properly charged and convicted under both § 1503 and § 1512); 15 United States v. Lester, 749 F.2d 1288, 1292-93 (9th Cir.1984); see also United States v. Beatty, 587 F.Supp. 1325 (E.D.N.Y.1984); but see United States v. Hernandez, 730 F.2d 895 (2d Cir.1984).
Cited · signal: see
See United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 964-65 (5th Cir.1984) (also suggesting that threats against a witness may still be prosecuted under the omnibus clause of section 1503) 26 The prosecutor's questioning of appellant Tyler before the grand jury is representative of the questioning of each of these appellants.
Cited · signal: see
See United States v. Wesley, 748 F.2d 962, 964-65 (5th Cir.1984) (also suggesting that threats against a witness may still be prosecuted under the omnibus clause of section 1503). .