How cited: Dana Farber Cancer Institute v. Eric Hargan · Go Syfert

Dana Farber Cancer Institute v. Eric Hargan (2017)

green · 6 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Ass’n, 908 F.3d at 1048 (Kethledge, J., concurring in the judgment) (citing OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY (online ed. 2018)) (concluding that CMS’s 2010 guidance, which pursued the same policy as the 2017 Rule, violated the plain meaning of the text). 24 Verizon Commc’ns, Inc. v. FCC, 535 U.S. 467 , 500–01 (2002) (internal quotations omitted). 25 Id. at 500 . 26 See Dana–Farber Cancer Inst. v. Hargan, 878 F.3d 336, 341 (D.C.
deferring to agency’s determination that a provider’s “‘actually incurred’ cost” of tax liability must reflect offsetting payments that “reduc[e] the cost” of the taxes
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
See Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. Coke, 551 U.S. 158, 170 (2007) (stating that “normally the specific governs the general”); 42 C.F.R. § 417.536 (a) (noting that the regulations’ general cost payment principles apply “[u]nless otherwise specified”). 20 In a final effort, the Secretary analogizes to regulations on “discounts” and “allowances” that are deducted from the reasonable cost calculation, see Cross MSJ at 18 (citing 42 C.F.R. § 413.98 (a)), and cites to a collect…
similarly holding that hospitals’ total tax costs should account for payments that offset tax liability
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
To determine whether this standard is met, the court must determine “whether the decision was based on a consideration of the relevant factors and whether there has been a clear error of judgment.” Dana- Farber Cancer Inst. v. Hargan, 878 F.3d 336, 343 (D.C.
quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983)
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see
See Dana- Farber Cancer Inst. v. Hargan, 878 F.3d 336, 339 (D.C.