United States v. Pierre Watson (2018)

green · 8 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 6

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green United States v. Armard Shields (2024)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

United States v. Watson, 883 F.3d 1033, 1037 (8th Cir. 2018) (reviewing denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea for abuse of discretion).

reviewing denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea for abuse of discretion

green United States v. Juan Colbert (2023)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

“When a defendant has entered a knowing and voluntary plea of guilty at a hearing at which he acknowledged committing the crime, the occasion for setting aside a guilty plea should seldom arise.” United States v. Watson, 883 F.3d 1033, 1037 (8th Cir. 2018) (citation omitted).

citation omitted

green Christopher Lee v. Linda Sanders (2019)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

United States v. Watson, 883 F.3d 1033, 1037 (8th Cir. 2018).

green Watson v. United States (2021)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.

United States v. Watson, 883 F.3d 1033, 1035 (8th Cir. 2018) On February 28, 2018, the Eighth Circuit affirmed this Court’s judgment.

green United States v. Robert Smith (2023)

Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Watson, 883 F.3d 1033, 1037 (8th Cir. 2018).

green United States v. Farrell Mitchell (2021)

Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Watson, 883 F.3d 1033, 1038 (8th Cir. 2018) (concluding there is no abuse of discretion in denying plea withdrawal when the claim “is directly contradicted by [a defendant’s] statements during his plea colloquy”); Harvey, 829 F.3d 586, 590 (8th Cir. 2016) (noting a district court is not required to give credence to “inherently unreliable allegations unsupported by specific facts”).

concluding there is no abuse of discretion in denying plea withdrawal when the claim “is directly contradicted by [a defendant’s] statements during his plea colloquy”