Matson Navigation Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Transp. (2018)
green
· 54 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2020 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
202020232026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Matson Navigation Company, Inc. v. DOT (2023)
Matson Navigation Co. v. DOT, 895 F.3d 799, 801, 804 (D.C.
At that time, Matson argued that the challenged orders fell within the scope of the Hobbs Act because they “involve[d] regulations and programs that are ‘interrelated’ with citizenship determinations in 46 U.S.C. § 50501 .” Matson Navigation Co. v. U.S. Dep’t of Transp., 895 F.3d 799, 804 (D.C.
“Matson I”
Matson Navigation Co., Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Transp., 895 F.3d 799 , 802–03 (D.C.
“Matson I”
green
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engi v. FRA (2020)
Cir. 1985); see also Matson Navigation Co. v. Department of Transp., 895 F.3d 799, 804 (D.C.
noting that the Hobbs Act’s limitations “period can be tolled by the timely filing of a [permissible] motion to reconsider”
See Matson Navigation Co. v. U.S. Dep’t of Transp., 895 F.3d 799, 803 (D.C.
See Matson Navigation Co. v. U.S. Dep’t of Transp., 895 F.3d 799, 803 (D.C.