How cited: Myrna Labow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Ronald Labow v. Commissioner of Internal… · Go Syfert

Myrna Labow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Ronald Labow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1985)

green · 39 citation events across 9 courts. Showing the 18 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198620062026
yellow Tokarski v. Commissioner (1986)
But See · Tax Ct. · signal: but cf. · 6 citations in this opinion
But cf. LaBow v. Commissioner , 763 F.2d 125 ↩ (2d Cir. 1985) , affg. in part, revg. in part, and remanding a Memorandum Opinion of this Court. 7.
Rule Authority · 4th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Devore v. Commissioner, 963 F.2d 280, 282 (9th Cir.1992); George v. Commissioner, 844 F.2d 225, 229-30 (5th Cir.1988); LaBow v. Commissioner, 763 F.2d 125, 129-30 (2d Cir.1985); Estate of Frieders v. Commissioner, 687 F.2d 224, 228 (7th Cir.1982).
Rule Authority · 4th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Devore v. Commissioner, 963 F.2d 280, 282 (9th Cir.1992); George v. Commissioner, 844 F.2d 225, 229-30 (5th Cir.1988); LaBow v. Commissioner, 763 F.2d 125, 129-30 (2d Cir.1985); Estate of Frieders v. Commissioner, 687 F.2d 224, 228 (7th Cir.1982). 28 SMA has neither alleged nor demonstrated any extraordinary circumstances.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Cinema ’84 v. Comm’r, 412 F.3d 366 , 370–71 (2d Cir. 2005) (motion to vacate); LaBow v. Comm’r, 763 F.2d 125, 129 (2d Cir. 1985) (motion for reconsideration).
motion for reconsideration
green Harris v. Comm'r (2018)
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Colon v. Comm’r, 252 F.3d 662, 662 (2d Cir. 2001) (dismissal); LaBow v. Comm’r, 763 F.2d 125, 129 (2d Cir. 1985) (motion for reconsideration).
motion for reconsideration
green Jarvis v. Comm'r (2018)
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Colon v. Comm’r, 252 F.3d 662, 662 (2d Cir. 2001) (dismissal for failure to prosecute); Cinema ’84 v. Comm’r, 412 F.3d 366 , 370–71 (2d Cir. 2005) (motion to vacate); LaBow v. Comm’r, 763 F.2d 125, 129 (2d Cir. 1985) (motion for reconsideration). 2 Upon a review of the record, we conclude that the Tax Court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Jarvis’ case and denying her motions to vacate and for reconsideration.
motion for reconsideration
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Petitioner also cites LaBow v. Commissioner, 763 F.2d 125, 129 (2d Cir.1985), wherein the Second Circuit found that the Tax Court abused its discretion in denying a taxpayer’s untimely motion for reconsideration.
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
United States v. Walton, 909 F.2d 915, 918-19 (6th Cir.1990); LaBow v. Commissioner, 763 F.2d 125, 131-32 (2d Cir.1985); Foster v. Commissioner, 756 F.2d 1430, 1439 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055 , 106 S.Ct. 793 , 88 L.Ed.2d 770 (1986); Chaum v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 156, 163-64 , 1977 WL 3733 (1977).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
The petitioners failed to overcome the presumption of correctness of the deficiency notice in the Tax Court, which they could have done with a showing that the IRS made a "naked assessment without any foundation whatsoever." LaBow v. Commissioner, 763 F.2d 125, 132 (2d Cir.1985) (citation omitted).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
It is true that even though proper diligence is not employed to secure evidence for use at a trial the ends of justice may require the granting of a new trial to present new evidence in certain limited instances, see LaBow v. Commissioner, 763 F.2d 125, 129 (2d Cir.1985); Ferrell v. Trailmobile, Inc., 223 F.2d 697, 698 (5th Cir.1955), but clearly here there was no abuse of discretion, see Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 36 , 101 S.Ct. 188, 190 , 66 L.Ed.…
green Craig J. Schieder (2022)
Rule Authority · Tax Ct.
As an initial matter, “[t]here is no burden on the Commissioner to justify his disallowance of a claimed deduction.” LaBow v. Commissioner, 763 F.2d 125, 132 (2d Cir. 1985) (quoting Hanover Ins.
quoting Hanover Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, 598 F.2d 1211, 1219 (1st Cir. 1979, aff’g 69 T.C. 260 (1977)), aff’g in part and rev’g in part on other grounds T.C. Memo. 1983-417
green Cohen v. United States (2014)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Although decisions of the United States Tax Court are not binding on this Court, "in an area of law where Tax Court expertise may be useful in explication,” courts "ordinarily give that expertise deference.” LaBow v. C.I.R., 763 F.2d 125, 130 (2d Cir.1985); accord Merkel v. C.I.R., 192 F.3d 844, 847-48 (9th Cir.1999) ("Because the Tax Court has special expertise in the field ... its opinions bearing on the Internal Revenue Code are 'entitled to respect.' ”) (citation omitted…
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
La Bow v. Commissioner, 763 F.2d 125, 131 (2d Cir.1985) (quoting Hintz v. Commissioner, 712 F.2d 281, 286 (7th Cir.1983) (internal quotation marks omitted)). 7 .See, e.g., Nora Beverages, Inc. v. Perrier Group of Am., Inc., 269 F.3d 114 , 123-24 (2d Cir.2001); Nora Beverages, Inc. v. Perrier Group of Am., Inc., 164 F.3d 736 , 746 (2d Cir.1998); Raskin v. Wyatt Co., 125 F.3d 55, 65-66 (2d Cir.1997).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
LaBow v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 763 F.2d 125, 131-32 (2d Cir.1985) (taxpayer “must always make an affirmative showing, based on ‘specific evidence’ and not just the ‘taxpayer’s unsupported statement,’ that he is entitled to a deduction”) (quoting Hintz v. Commissioner, 712 F.2d 281, 286 (7th Cir.1983)).
green Byrne v. Commissioner (2013)
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See LaBow v. Comm’r, 763 F.2d 125, 129 (2d Cir.1985).
Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., LaBow v. Commissioner, 763 F.2d 125, 129 (2d Cir.1985). 9 In light of the admissions and the other evidence in the record, the Tax Court's ruling that petitioner was not entitled to net-operating-loss carryforwards was not erroneous.
Cited · D. Conn. · signal: see
See 322 F. App’x at 419 . be useful in explication,’ courts ‘ordinarily give that expertise deference.’” (quoting LaBow v. C.I.R., 763 F.2d 125, 130 (2d Cir. 1985))).
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See LaBow v. Commissioner, 763 F.2d 125, 131 (2d Cir.1985).