In re Petition of LK Holdings, LLC (2018)
green
· 6 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 2 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
In re Investigation Into Solarcity Corp. (2019)
See In re LK Holdings, LLC , 2018 VT 109 , ¶ 34, --- Vt. ----, 201 A.3d 373 (treating Commission decision declining to waive its rule as discretionary action and reviewing for abuse of discretion); Halnon , 174 Vt. at 517 , 811 A.2d at 165 (stating abuse-of-discretion standard); see also Cady Hill , 2018 VT 3 , ¶ 15, 206 Vt. 430 , 182 A.3d 53 ("[W]e accord a strong presumption of validity to the Commission's orders." (quotation and alteration omitted)).
green
Chelsea Solar v. Puc (2025)
The provisions of Title 30 clearly control here. “[W]here two statutes deal with the same subject matter, and one is general and the other specific, the more specific statute controls.” Town of Brattleboro v. Garfield, 2006 VT 56, ¶ 10 , 180 Vt. 90 ; see In re Petition of LK Holdings, LLC, 2018 VT 109, ¶ 38 , 209 Vt. 14 (“To the extent that there is a conflict between [Title 30] and the VAPA, the more specific statute, that is, [Title 30], controls.”).