State v. Seckinger (2018)
green
· 79 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2018 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201820222026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Klipfel (2024)
See, also, State v. Seckinger, 301 Neb. 963, 969-70 , 920 N.W.2d 842, 847 (2018) (“For decades, this court has consistently held that officers with sufficient training and experience who detect the odor of marijuana emanating from a vehicle have probable cause on that basis alone to search the vehicle under the automobile exception to the warrant requirement.”) The odor of marijuana provided Officer Hudec and Sergeant Mayo probable cause for the search.
“For decades, this court has consistently held that officers with sufficient training and experience who detect the odor of marijuana emanating from a vehicle have probable cause on that basis alone to search the vehicle under the automobile exception to the warrant requirement.”
green
State v. Buie (2026)
See State v. Seckinger, 301 Neb. 963 , 920 N.W.2d 842 (2018).
green
State v. Dorsey (2022)
See State v. Seckinger, 301 Neb. 963 , 920 N.W.2d 842 (2018). -4- The Nebraska Supreme Court has held: the requirement of ready mobility for the automobile exception is met whenever a vehicle that is not located on private property is capable or apparently capable of being driven on the roads or highways.
green
State v. Garza (2020)
See State v. Seckinger, 301 Neb. 963 , 920 N.W.2d 842 (2018).
green
State v. Knight (2020)
See id.