Averback v. Montrose Ford, Inc. (2019)
green
· 21 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2019 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201920222026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Dakota Girls, LLC v. Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co. (2021)
Fund, 138 S. Ct. 1061, 1077 (2018); Jama v. Immigration & Customs Enf’t, 543 U.S. 335 , 344 n.4 (2005); see also Averback v. Montrose Ford, Inc., 120 N.E.3d 125, 133 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019) (“[A]n antecedent can be a word, phrase, or clause.”) (emphasis added).
“[A]n antecedent can be a word, phrase, or clause.”
green
McNichols v. Gouge Quality Roofing, L.L.C. (2022)
An appellate court reviews awards of treble damages de novo because determining “ ‘ “whether treble damages are appropriate is a question of law.” ’ ” Green Maple, supra at ¶ 31, quoting, Averback v. Montrose Ford, Inc., 2019-Ohio-373 , 120 N.E.3d 125 ¶ 35 (9th Dist.), quoting Fleischer v. George, 9th Dist.
green
Donovan v. Kirtland Country Club (2026)
“The primary goal in construing an administrative rule is to ascertain and give effect to the intent of the rule-making authority.” (Citation omitted.) Averback v. Montrose Ford, Inc., 2019-Ohio-373, ¶ 17 (9th Dist.).
green
Warman v. Select Auto (2024)
Averback v. Montrose Ford, Inc., 2019-Ohio-373 , 120 N.E.3d 125, ¶ 38 (9th Dist.); Green Maple Ents., LLC v. Forrester, 2021-Ohio-4640 , 182 N.E.3d 1265 , ¶ 47 (7th Dist.).
green
Walker v. Cedar Fair. L.P. (2022)
“OCSPA claims essentially arise from contractual relationships, . . .” Averback v. Montrose Ford, Inc., 120 N.E.3d 125, 137 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
green
Mocznianski v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs. (2020)
Averback v. Montrose Ford, Inc., 2019-Ohio-373 , 120 N.E.3d 125, ¶ 16 (9th Dist.); Howell v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs., 7th Dist.
green
Ostigny v. France (2025)
See Averback v. Montrose Ford, Inc., 2019-Ohio-373 (9th Dist.) (holding that the 26 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS consumer failed to present sufficient evidence of actual economic damages based on a dealership’s violation of the CSPA for failing to appropriately disclose a defect that was repaired prior to the sale of the vehicle to the consumer, despite the fact that the asserted damages arose from the CSPA violation, where the consumer only presented evidence of dam…