How cited: Michael Nall v. BNSF Railway Company · Go Syfert

Michael Nall v. BNSF Railway Company (2019)

green · 324 citation events across 20 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2017 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201720212026
But See · D. Neb. · signal: but see · 2 citations in this opinion
But see Nall, 917 F.3d at 351 (Costa, J., concurring) (“As the judge-created doctrine has been widely criticized for its inefficiency and unfairness even in the space it is supposed to occupy —a tool for evaluating the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence—we should not expand it beyond those bounds.”).
Costa, J., concurring
Rule Authority · SCOTUS · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 917 F. 3d 335, 351 (CA5 2019) (Costa, J., specially concurring).
Costa, J., specially concurring
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 3 citations in this opinion
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 341 (5th Cir. 2019).
green Awe v. Harris Health (2026)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019) (quoting Sandstad v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc., 309 F.3d 893, 896 (5th Cir. 2002)).
quoting Sandstad v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc., 309 F.3d 893, 896 (5th Cir. 2002)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 341 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Rule Authority · 4th Cir.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 351 (5th Cir. 2019) (Costa, J., specially concurring).
Costa, J., specially concurring
Rule Authority · 4th Cir.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 351 (5th Cir. 2019) (Costa, J., specially concurring).
Costa, J., specially concurring
green Highland v. NexPoint (2024)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
For the employee to meet the burden, he must “produce evidence from which a jury could conclude that [the employer’s] articulated reason is pretextual.” Nall v. BNSF Railway Co., 917 F.3d 335, 342 (5th Cir. 2019).
Quote Authority · 5th Cir.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 349 (5th Cir. 2019) (“Ultimately, the employee must show that ‘but for’ the protected activity, the adverse employment action would not have occurred.”) (citations omitted). 4 Case: 23-30704 Document: 63-1 Page: 5 Date Filed: 05/28/2024 No. 23-30704 Defendant Captain Marc Mashaw heard that an employee had run for office and actually won.
“Ultimately, the employee must show that ‘but for’ the protected activity, the adverse employment action would not have occurred.”
Quote Authority · S.D. Tex. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Nall, 917 F.3d at 345 (“Even if it is true that BNSF could choose to credit the opinions of its own doctors over Nall’s, the evidence identified by Nall puts into question the objective reasonableness of those opinions.”).
“Even if it is true that BNSF could choose to credit the opinions of its own doctors over Nall’s, the evidence identified by Nall puts into question the objective reasonableness of those opinions.”
Rule Authority · D. Neb. · 3 citations in this opinion
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 350 (5th Cir. 2019) (Costa, J., specially concurring).
Costa, J., specially concurring
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · D.N.H. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 347 (5th Cir. 2019)) as to what was required for plaintiffs to cure the purported violations and maintain or resume their occupancy of the Property, for example, when Hays allegedly offered to stay enforcement of the May 8 Notice if plaintiffs demonstrated progress toward NHCORR certification, and then subsequently revoked that offer.9 Construing these allegations in plaintiffs’ favor, it is reasonable to infer that the City’s lack of clear instructions to…
Quote Authority · N.D. Tex. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 341 (5th Cir. 2019) (“To be evidence of animus, the comment requires an inference that the irreversible nature of Parkinson’s disease was the reason why [the plaintiff] would not be returning to work.”).
“To be evidence of animus, the comment requires an inference that the irreversible nature of Parkinson’s disease was the reason why [the plaintiff] would not be returning to work.”
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019) (quoting Sandstad v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc., 309 F.3d 893, 896 (5th Cir. 2002)).
quoting Sandstad v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc., 309 F.3d 893, 896 (5th Cir. 2002)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 348 (5th Cir. 2019) (conducting a single analysis under the ADA to evaluate the plaintiff's TCHRA and ADA retaliation claims); Rodriguez v. ConAgra Grocery Products Co., 436 F.3d 468, 473-74 (Sth Cir. 2006) (“Given the similarity between the ADA and the TCHRA, Texas courts ‘look to analogous federal precedent for guidance when interpreting the Texas Act.’” (quoting NME Hosps., Inc. v. Rennels, 994 S.W.2d 142, 144 (Tex.1999)).
conducting a single analysis under the ADA to evaluate the plaintiff's TCHRA and ADA retaliation claims
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 349 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · N.D. Miss.
“An issue of material fact is genuine if a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmovant.” Nall v. BNSF Railway Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019) (quoting Sandstad, 309 F.3d at 896 ) (internal citation omitted).
quoting Sandstad, 309 F.3d at 896
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019)).
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · N.D. Miss.
“An issue of material fact is genuine if a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmovant.” Nall v. BNSF Railway Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 342 (5th Cir. 2019) (quoting Chevron U.S.A.
quoting Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Echazabal, 536 U.S. 73, 86 (2002)
Rule Authority · S.D. Miss.
“If an inference is required for evidence to be probative as to an employer’s discriminatory animus, the evidence is circumstantial, not direct.” ., 917 F.3d 335, 341 (5th Cir. 2019).
green Vasquez v. Nelson (2025)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Once the employer does so, the plaintiff “must then show ‘sufficient evidence that the proffered reason is a pretext for retaliation.’” Id. (quoting Nall v. BNSF Ry., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019)).
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · N.D. Miss.
“An issue of material fact is genuine if a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmovant.” Nall v. BNSF Railway Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 341 (Sth Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · N.D. Miss.
“An employer is entitled to a direct threat defense if an employee poses a ‘significant risk to the health or safety of others that cannot be eliminated by reasonable accommodation.’” Nall v. BNSF Railway Co., 917 F.3d 335, 342 (5th Cir. 2019) (quoting EEOC v. E.I.
quoting EEOC v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 480 F.3d 724, 731 (5th Cir. 2007)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019) (quoting Sandstad v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc., 309 F.3d 893, 896 (5th Cir. 2002)).
quoting Sandstad v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc., 309 F.3d 893, 896 (5th Cir. 2002)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · E.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 341 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · E.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 346 (5th Cir. 2019); Little v. Tex. Dep’t of Crim.
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · D.N.H.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 344 (5th Cir. 2019).
Rule Authority · E.D. Tex.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2019).
Quote Authority · D. Ariz.
Co., 917 F.3d 335, 345 (5th Cir. 2019) (“Even if it is true that BNSF could 15 choose to credit the opinions of its own doctors over Nall’s, the evidence identified by Nall 16 puts into question the objective reasonableness of those opinions.”).
“Even if it is true that BNSF could 15 choose to credit the opinions of its own doctors over Nall’s, the evidence identified by Nall 16 puts into question the objective reasonableness of those opinions.”