Cluster 463511 (1986)

green · 72 citation events across 13 courts. Showing the 21 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 21

Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

198620062026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Amoco Production Company, and Texaco, Inc. v. Forest Oil Corporation (1988)

Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 3 citations in this opinion

Article 2051 provides: "Although a contract is worded in general terms, it must be interepreted to cover only those things it appears the parties intended to include.” 7 .See Knapp, 781 F.2d at 1127-28.

green American Home Assurance Co. v. Chevron, USA, Inc. (2005)

Rule Authority · 5th Cir.

Knapp v. Chevron USA, Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1130 (5th Cir.1986). 14 . 848 F.2d 515 (1988). 15 .

green Hodgen v. Forest Oil Corp. (1996)

Rule Authority · 5th Cir.

Although we have traveled this ground before, see Knapp v. Chevron USA Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1130-31 (5th Cir.1986), A & A makes a complex argument that in essence asks us to apply the holding of Voisin v. O.D.E.C.O.

green Jerry B. Hodgen and Bobby Sue Hodgen v. Forest Oil Corp., Forest Oil Corp. And Ronald J. Doucet, Defendants-T… (1996)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

Although we have traveled this ground before, see Knapp v. Chevron USA, Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1130-31 (5th Cir.1986), A & A makes a complex argument that in essence asks us to apply the holding of Voisin v. O.D.E.C.O.

green Wagner v. McDermott, Inc. (1996)

Rule Authority · 5th Cir.

Knapp, 781 F.2d at 1131 (citations omitted).

citations omitted

green Mark Wagner v. McDermott Inc., Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Capital Welding & Fabrication, In… (1996)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

Nor are we persuaded that these amendments preempt the field. 10 Knapp, 781 F.2d at 1131 (citations omitted). 11 Similarly in Doucet, a roustabout was injured on an offshore platform.

citations omitted

green Robert M. Gates, Cross-Appellee v. Shell Offshore, Inc., (Substituted as Party for Shell Oil), Cross-Appellan… (1989)

Rule Authority · 5th Cir.

We reverse and remand on that issue. 29 AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED. 1 When applying the Louisiana law as "surrogate federal law" under the OCSLA, we have recognized that we may have "more discretion and broader authority in [our] evaluation, analysis, and application of state law to a given fact situation than an Erie court." Knapp v. Chevron USA, Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1129 (5th Cir.1986)

green Gates v. Shell Offshore, Inc. (1989)

Rule Authority · 5th Cir.

When applying the Louisiana law as "surrogate federal law” under the OCSLA, we have recognized that we may have "more discretion and broader authority in [our] evaluation, analysis, and application of state law to a given fact situation than an Erie court." Knapp v. Chevron USA, Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1129 (5th Cir.1986).

green Richard Joseph Doucet v. Gulf Oil Corporation, Richard Joseph Doucet v. Gulf Oil Corporation, Defendant-Third… (1986)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

Sec. 9:2780 (West Supp.1985) 19 Knapp v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1127-29, 1131 (5th Cir.1986); Sullen v. Missouri Pacific RR.

green Doucet v. Gulf Oil Corp. (1986)

Rule Authority · 5th Cir.

Knapp v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1127-29, 1131 (5th Cir.1986); Sullen v. Missouri Pacific RR.

green Dupre v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (1996)

Rule Authority · E.D. La.

Knapp, 781 F.2d at 1127; Steele, 738 F.2d at 705 ; Sistrunk, 693 F.Supp. at 499-500 .

green Wagner v. McDermott, Inc. (1994)

Rule Authority · W.D. La.

Does this mean that under federal law these agreements shall be enforceable, or that they may be enforceable depending on whether state law or maritime law controls the contract. 12 In various cases the Fifth Circuit has stated in dicta that 905(c) “permits certain indemnity agreements,” Knapp v. Chevron USA Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1131 (5th Cir.1986), that 905(c) “sanctions” mutual indemnity provisions between vessel owner and employer, Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co., 791 F.2d…

green Cluster 12492

Rule Authority

Drilling Co., 738 F.2d 703, 705 (5th Cir.1984) (stabbing board not an appurtenance of drilling rig); Knapp v. Chevron USA, Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1127 (5th Cir.1986) (safety net not an appurtenance of platform); Harrison v. Exxon Corp., 824 F.2d 444, 447 (5th Cir.1987) (blowout preventer was not an appurtenance of platform). 22 .

green Jimmy Reed and Cindy Reed v. Shell Offshore Inc. (1989)

Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see

See Knapp v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., 781 F.2d 1123 , 1129 (5th Cir.1986).

green Robert Earl Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Oilfield Services of Cameron, Inc., Third Party (1986)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See Knapp v. Chevron, 781 F.2d 1123 (5th Cir.1986); Sullen v. Missouri Pacific R.

green Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co. (1986)

Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also

Compare Laird v. Shell Oil Co., 770 F.2d 508, 511-12 (5th Cir.1986) (under Louisiana law, in-demnitor has no obligation to defend unless the complaint alleges facts which, if proven, would give rise to coverage under the indemnity agreement); see also Knapp v. Chevron USA, Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1131 (5th Cir.1986). .

green Andrew Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co., Defendant-Third Party Cross-Appellant, Cross-Appellee v. Rowandrill, I… (1986)

Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see also

None of the parties in this case has suggested that the settlement with Fontenot was unreasonable 13 Compare Laird v. Shell Oil Co., 770 F.2d 508, 511-12 (5th Cir.1986) (under Louisiana law, indemnitor has no obligation to defend unless the complaint alleges facts which, if proven, would give rise to coverage under the indemnity agreement); see also Knapp v. Chevron USA, Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1131 (5th Cir.1986) 14 It is well-established, however, that Bristow need not indemn…

green Hole v. W&T Offshore, Inc. (2023)

Cited (see also) · S.D. Tex. · signal: see also

Co., 953 F.2d 985, 988 (5th Cir. 1992); see also Knapp v. Chevron USA, Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1129 (5th Cir. 1986) (discussing difference between Erie inquiry and OCSLA inquiry—in OCSLA cases federal courts may be more ready to reject intermediate state appellate court interpretations).

discussing difference between Erie inquiry and OCSLA inquiry—in OCSLA cases federal courts may be more ready to reject intermediate state appellate court interpretations

green Trosclair v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (2001)

Cited · S.D. Tex. · signal: see

See Knapp v. Chevron USA, Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1129 (5th Cir.1986) (noting that under OCSLA, a federal court sits as Lands Act Court, not an Eñe Court, and hence has more discretion with regard to interpreting state law than an Eñe Court); Ferguson v. Stingray Pipeline Co., 672 F.Supp. 944, 946 (W.D.La.1987).

green United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Loop, Inc. (1991)

Cited (see also) · E.D. La. · signal: see, e.g.

See e.g., Knapp v. Chevron USA, Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1130 (5th Cir.1986).

green Carney v. Marathon Oil Co. (1986)

Cited · W.D. La. · signal: see

See Knapp v. Chevron, USA, Inc., 781 F.2d 1123 , (5th Cir.1986); Sullen v. Missouri Pacific R.