How cited: SEXTON Et Al. v. SEWELL Et Al. · Go Syfert

SEXTON Et Al. v. SEWELL Et Al. (2019)

green · 4 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 2 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Quote Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see also
“Specific performance is an equitable remedy available when the damages recoverable at law would not be an adequate compensation for nonperformance.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Simpson v. Pendergast, 290 Ga. App. 293, 297 (2) ( 659 SE2d 716 ) (2008); see also Sexton v. Sewell, 351 Ga. App. 273 , 279 (1) ( 830 SE2d 605 ) (2019) (“it was well established that monetary damages are not an adequate legal remedy where the contract sought to be performed involved the sale …
“it was well established that monetary damages are not an adequate legal remedy where the contract sought to be performed involved the sale of unique real property[.]”
Cited · M.D. Ga. · signal: see
See Sexton v. Sewell, 830 S.E.2d 605, 609 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019); O.C.G.A. §§ 23-2-130, 23-1-3.