State v. Matuu. (2019)
green
· 30 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2020 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
202020232026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
In re: DM (2022)
The Hawai#i Supreme Court explained that "[t]he test for assessing a defendant's self-protection justification pursuant to HRS § 703-304 (2014) involves two prongs because HRS § 703-300 (2014) defines 'believes' as 'reasonably believes'[.]" State v. Matuu, 144 Hawai#i 510, 520, 445 P.3d 91, 101 (2019) (footnote omitted).
footnote omitted
green
State v. Lauvao (2022)
"Once evidence of justification has been adduced, the prosecution has the burden of disproving it beyond a reasonable doubt." State v. Matuu, 144 Hawaiʻi 510, 520, 445 P.3d 91, 101 (2019) (citing State v. Culkin, 97 Hawaiʻi 206, 215, 35 P.3d 233, 242 (2001)).
citing State v. Culkin, 97 Hawaiʻi 206, 215, 35 P.3d 233, 242 (2001)
green
State v. Best (2022)
However, the record shows that the Circuit Court found relevant portions of both Best's and Butler's testimony regarding their altercation to be credible and to 9/ "The test for assessing a defendant's self-protection justification pursuant to HRS § 703-304 . . . involves two prongs because HRS § 703-300 . . . defines 'believes' as 'reasonably believes.'" Matuu, 144 Hawai#i at 520, 445 P.3d at 101 (footnote omitted); see State v. Lubong, 77 Hawai#i 429, 433, 886 P.2d 766, 77…
footnote omitted
green
State v. Achuo (2021)
In other words, your verdict must be unanimous." 144 Hawai#i at 520, 445 P.3d at 101 (original brackets omitted).
original brackets omitted
green
State v. Char (2020)
He does not have to prove anything." Likewise, the court instructed: "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is a very high standard for the prosecution to satisfy." Viewed as a whole, the court's instructions were not "prejudicially insufficient, erroneous, inconsistent, or misleading." State v. Matuu, 144 Hawai#i 510, 516, 445 P.3d 91, 97 (2019) (quoting State v. Kassebeer, 118 Hawai#i 493, 504, 193 P.3d 409, 420 (2008)).
quoting State v. Kassebeer, 118 Hawai#i 493, 504, 193 P.3d 409, 420 (2008)
green
State v. Adcock. (2020)
State v. Matuu, 144 Hawai#i 510, 516, 445 P.3d 91, 97 (2019) (quoting State v. Kassebeer, 118 Hawai#i 493, 504, 193 P.3d 409, 420 (2008)).
quoting State v. Kassebeer, 118 Hawai#i 493, 504, 193 P.3d 409, 420 (2008)
green
State v. Arroyo (2021)
See State v. Matuu, 144 Hawai#i 510, 520, 445 P.3d 91, 101 (2019) (quoting State v. Knight, 80 Hawai#i 318, 327, 909 P.2d 1133, 1142 (1996) ("juries are presumed to ... follow all of the trial court's instructions[.]" (ellipsis in original)).
quoting State v. Knight, 80 Hawai#i 318, 327, 909 P.2d 1133, 1142 (1996) ("juries are presumed to ... follow all of the trial court's instructions[.]" (ellipsis in original)
green
State v. Ngalu, Jr. (2021)
See generally State v. Matuu, 144 Hawai#i 510, 445 P.3d 91 (2019) (regarding conviction for Assault One); State v. Jhun, 83 Hawai#i 472, 482, 927 P.2d 1355, 1365 (1996) (regarding conviction for Assault Two); State v. Pavao, 81 Hawai#i 142, 913 P.2d 553 (App. 1996) (regarding conviction for Assault Three).
regarding conviction for Assault Three