State v. Abrigo. (2019)

Hearsay "Where the admissibility of evidence is determined by application of the hearsay rule, there can be only one correct result, and the appropriate standard for appellate review is the right/wrong standard." State v. Abrigo, 144 Hawai‘i 491, 497, 445 P.3d 72, 78 (2019) (cleaned up). 6 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Prosecutorial Misconduct "Allegations of prosecutorial misconduct are reviewed under the harmless beyond a reasonable dou…

Feb. 5, 2024); State v. Abrigo, 445 P.3d 72, 81 (Haw. 2019); State v. Edmonds, 435 P.3d 752, 760 (Or. 2019); Bohsancurt v. Eisenberg, 129 P.3d 471, 481 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006); Kennedy v. State, 193 S.W.3d 645 , 659– 60 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006); Michael H.

HRE Rule 803(b)(8)(C) (permitting "in civil proceedings" the admission of public records and reports containing "factual findings resulting from an investigation made pursuant to authority granted by law"); State v. Abrigo, 144 Hawaiʻi 491, 493, 445 P.3d 72, 74 (2019) ("An exception to the evidentiary rule against hearsay typically allows public records to be admitted into evidence to prove the truth of their 5 The DHS worker testified that "unconfirmed" means "that there is…

"Where the admissibility of evidence is determined by application of the hearsay rule, there can be only one correct result, and 8 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER the appropriate standard for appellate review is the right/wrong standard." State v. Abrigo, 144 Hawai#i 491, 497, 445 P.3d 72, 78 (2019) (internal quotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted).

See State v. Abrigo, 144 Hawai#i 491, 500 n.14, 445 P.3d 72 , 81 n.14 (2019) ("Federal cases interpreting the [FRE] serve as 'persuasive authority in interpreting similar provisions of the [HRE].'" (second alteration in original) (citation omitted)).

See State v. Abrigo, 144 Hawai#i 491, 497, 445 P.3d 72, 78 (2019) ("Where the admissibility of evidence is determined by application of the hearsay rule, there can be only one correct result, and the appropriate standard for appellate review is the right/wrong standard." (quoting State v. Moore, 82 Hawai#i 202, 217, 921 P.2d 122, 137 (1996) (brackets and internal quotation marks omitted))).