State v. Weldon. (2019)
green
· 22 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 13 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2020 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
202020232026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Safadago (2022)
In its Order Denying the First Motion to Suppress filed February 4, 2019, the Circuit Court concluded that pursuant to HRS § 803-4,5 "Officer Buratti had a reasonable suspicion to believe that the Defendant was the offender because the Defendant was in the area where the crime was committed and was endeavoring to escape." "An appellate court reviews a ruling on a motion to suppress de novo to determine whether the ruling was 'right' or 'wrong.'" State v. Weldon, 144 Hawai#i …
quoting Tominiko, 126 Hawai#i at 75, 266 P.3d at 1129
green
State v. Dandurand (2026)
State v. Hewitt, 153 Hawai#i 33, 40, 526 P.3d 558, 565 (2023) (quoting State v. Weldon, 144 Hawai#i 522, 530, 445 P.3d 103, 111 (2019)).
green
State v. Nathanael (2021)
State v. Weldon, 144 Hawai#i 522, 531, 445 P.3d 103, 112 (2019).
green
State v. Tupuola (2026)
See State v. Makaila, 79 Hawaiʻi 40, 45, 897 P.2d 967, 972 (1995); State v. Weldon, 144 Hawaiʻi 522, 531, 445 P.3d 103, 112 (2019).
green
Ervin v. United States (2026)
Cir. 2020) (seizure when two officers parked their car three feet from defendant’s car at night and shined a “take-down” light at it, with the parking distance being the “most important[]” factor); United States v. Burton, 441 F.3d 509, 510, 512 (7th Cir. 2006) (seizure when three officers on bicycles approached defendant’s car from the front and on either side); State v. Pham, 497 P.3d 217 , 223 (Mont. 2021) (seizure when two officers approached defendant’s car on either si…
seizure when “at least two officers, and likely three, had surrounded” a suspect and asked for identification
green
State v. Yuen. Dissenting Opinion by Recktenwald, C.J., in Which Ginoza, J., Joins. ICA Order of Correction, … (2024)
State v. Weldon, 144 Hawaiʻi 522, 534, 445 P.3d 103, 115 (2019) (illegal seizure); State v. Knight, 63 Haw. 90, 93 , 621 P.2d 370, 374 (1980) (per curiam) (illegal search); see also, State v. Won, 137 Hawaiʻi 330, 338, 372 P.3d 1065, 1073 (2015) (holding that a breath test is a search subject to the constitutional constraints of Article I, Section 7 of the Hawaiʻi Constitution).
illegal seizure
green
State v. Kanoa (2024)
State v. Weldon, 144 Hawai#i 522, 531-32, 445 P.3d 103, 112-13 (2019) (quoting Tominiko, 126 Hawai#i at 77, 266 P.3d at 1131 (2011)).
quoting Tominiko, 126 Hawai#i at 77, 266 P.3d at 1131 (2011)
green
State v. Ramseyer (2023)
"An appellate court reviews a ruling on a motion to suppress de novo to determine whether the ruling was 'right' or 'wrong.'" State v. Weldon, 144 Hawai#i 522, 530, 445 P.3d 103, 111 (2019) (quoting State v. Tominiko, 126 Hawai#i 68, 75, 266 P.3d 1122, 1129 (2011)).
quoting State v. Tominiko, 126 Hawai#i 68, 75, 266 P.3d 1122, 1129 (2011)
green
State v. Hewitt. (2023)
Standard of Review “An appellate court reviews a ruling on a motion to suppress de novo to determine whether the ruling was ‘right’ or ‘wrong.’” State v. Weldon, 144 Hawaiʻi 522, 530, 445 P.3d 103, 111 (2019) (quoting State v. Tominiko, 126 Hawaiʻi 68, 75, 266 P.3d 1122, 1129 (2011)).
quoting State v. Tominiko, 126 Hawaiʻi 68, 75, 266 P.3d 1122, 1129 (2011)
green
State v. Sagapolutele-Silva. (2022)
STANDARD OF REVIEW “An appellate court reviews a ruling on a motion to suppress de novo to determine whether the ruling was ‘right’ or ‘wrong.’” State v. Weldon, 144 Hawaiʻi 522, 530, 445 P.3d 103, 111 (2019) (quoting State v. Tominiko, 126 Hawaiʻi 68, 75, 266 P.3d 1122, 1129 (2011)).
quoting State v. Tominiko, 126 Hawaiʻi 68, 75, 266 P.3d 1122, 1129 (2011)
green
State v. Pada (2021)
State v. Weldon, 144 Hawai#i 522, 531-32, 445 P.3d 103, 112-13 (2019) (quoting State v. Tominiko, 126 Hawai#i 68, 77, 266 P.3d 1122, 1131 (2011)); see State v. Kearns, 75 Haw. 558, 566 , 867 P.2d 903, 907 (1994).
quoting State v. Tominiko, 126 Hawai#i 68, 77, 266 P.3d 1122, 1131 (2011)
green
State v. Ogata (2020)
State v. Weldon, 144 Hawai#i 522, 531, 445 P.3d 103, 112 (2019) (cleaned up).
cleaned up
green
State v. Willis. (2021)
See State v. Weldon, 144 Hawaiʻi 522, 534, 445 P.3d 103, 115 (2019) (recognizing that courts “prohibit the use of evidence at trial that comes to light as a result of the exploitation of a previous illegal act of the police”).
recognizing that courts “prohibit the use of evidence at trial that comes to light as a result of the exploitation of a previous illegal act of the police”