How cited: A & A Concrete, Inc. v. The White Mountain Apache Tribe · Go Syfert

A & A Concrete, Inc. v. The White Mountain Apache Tribe (1986)

green · 77 citation events across 19 courts. Showing the 35 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198620062026
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion
Co. v. Crow Tribal Council, 940 F.2d 1239, 1245-46 (9th Cir.1991); Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. Rose, 893 F.2d 1074 , 1078 n. 3 (9th Cir.1990); Sanders, 864 F.2d at 631 n. 1; Wellman, 815 F.2d at 578-79 ; A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1417 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986); accord Brown v. Washoe Housing Auth., 835 F.2d 1327, 1328 (10th Cir.1988); Superior Oil Co. v. United States, 798…
Rule Authority · 1st Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Mindful of the skeptical stance taken by other courts toward such allegations, see, e.g., Iowa Mut., 480 U.S. at 19 , 107 S.Ct. 971 ; A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1417 (9th Cir.1986), we reject them here.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co. v. Crow Tribal Council, 940 F.2d 1239, 1241 (9th Cir.1991) (action to challenge tribal ordinance that “established] ‘general duties’ for common carriers operating on the Crow Reservation”); Stock West, Inc. v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, 873 F.2d 1221, 1222 (9th Cir.1989) (action to compel arbitration of contract “to construct and later manage a sawmill on the Colville reservation”); White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Smith Plumbing Co., 856 F.2d 1301, 1
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Tribal jurisdiction is colorable, for example, when the events that “form the bases for [Plaintiff’s] claims occurred or were commenced on tribal territory.” A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1416 (9th Cir. 1986).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1414 (9th Cir.1986).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Tribal courts have "inherent power to adjudicate civil disputes affecting the interests of Indians and non-Indians which are based upon events occurring on the reservation." A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1415 (9th Cir.) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 (1986).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1414 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 (1986); Grigsby v. CMI Corp., 765 F.2d 1369, 1373 (9th Cir.1985).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
See, e.g., Wellman v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 815 F.2d 577, 578 (9th Cir.1987); A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1415 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986); Hardin v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 779 F.2d 476, 479 (9th Cir.1985) (as amended); Snow v. Quinault Indian Nation, 709 F.2d 1319, 1322 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1214 , 104 S.Ct. 2655 , 81 L.Ed.2d 362 (1984).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Christianson v. Colt Ind. Operating Corp., --- U.S. ----, ----, 108 S.Ct. 2166, 2176-78 , 100 L.Ed.2d 811 (1988); A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1418 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 , (1986); Moore v. James H.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1414 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1414 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986). 36 HawTel offers several responses.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Cos. v. Crow Tribe of Indians, 471 U.S. 845, 856 , 105 S.Ct. 2447, 2454 , 85 L.Ed.2d 818 (1985); A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1415 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1418 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986) (citing National Farmers Union Insurance Cos. v. Crow Tribe of Indians of Montana, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 2447 , 85 L.Ed.2d 818 (1985)); Superior Oil, 619 F.Supp. at 535 n. 3 (citing National Farmers ).
Rule Authority · Ariz. · 2 citations in this opinion
A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1414 (9th Cir.1986).
green (PC) Goff v. Gamez (2023)
Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.
Cal. 10 Nov. 6, 2017) (applying res judicata to successive Rule 60(b) motions). 11 Similarly, a court “is precluded from reexamining an issue previously decided by the 12 same court, or a higher appellate court, in the same case.” A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White 13 Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1418 (9th Cir. 1986); In re Watson, 192 B.R. at 750 14 (denial of the previous motion to reopen the case called for the denial of a subsequent motion to 15 reopen based on the s…
green KAISHA v. Dodson (2010)
Rule Authority · N.D. Cal.
“The doctrines of res judicata and collateral estop-pel operate to preclude relitigation of claims or issues in a subsequent action between the same parties or those in privity with them.” A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1417 (9th Cir.1986) (citation omitted).
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Corp., 207 F.3d at 34 (determining facts did not support the futility exception where the tribal court was a subset of the tribal council and plaintiff argued the court would “march in lockstep” with the position of the council); A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1416-17 (9th Cir.1986) (denying plaintiffs claim of futility based on bias and incompetence of tribal judge where plaintiffs failed to challenge the judge’s qualifications at the tr…
Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.
Additionally, “tribal courts have inherent power to adjudicate civil disputes affecting the interests of Indians and non-Indians which are based upon events occurring on the reservation.” Smith Plumbing Co., 149 Ariz. at 529 , 720 P.2d at 504 (quoting A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1415-16 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986)).
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
See Bowen v. Doyle, 880 F.Supp. 99, 127 (W.D.N.Y.1995); citing, A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1416-17 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986); Middlemist, 824 F.Supp. at 946 (Exhaustion not required only if tribe asserts jurisdiction in bad faith, in violation of express jurisdictional prohibition, or there was an inadequate opportunity to challenge the court’s jurisdiction).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. BAP
A court “is precluded from reexamining an issue previously decided by the same court, or a higher appellate court, in the same ease.” A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1418 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986).
green Bowen v. Doyle (1995)
Rule Authority · W.D.N.Y.
For example, in A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1416-17 (9th Cir.1986), the court rejected allegations that the non-Indian contractor would be denied due process in tribal court because the Chief Judge of the tribal court lacked “adequate legal training” and was allegedly “biased by her connection with the tribal council.” Id. at 1416-17 .
Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.
A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1418 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986); Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Indus.
Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.
A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1418 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986).
green Begay v. Roberts (1990)
Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.
In recognition of their sovereignty, “[t]he [United States] Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that tribal courts have inherent power to adjudicate civil disputes affecting the interests of Indians and non-Indians which are based upon events occurring on the reservation.” Smith Plumbing Co., 149 Ariz. at 529 , 720 P.2d at 504 (1986) (quoting A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1415-16 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct…
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See id.
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: compare
Compare Fort Frye Teachers Ass’n, 81 Ohio St.3d at 396, 692 N.E.2d at 144 (adopting “real party in interest” privity test) and Deaton, 107 Ohio App.3d at 413 , 669 N.E.2d at 5 (holding that privity exists if "another ... is so identified in interest with [a party in first proceeding] ... that he represents the same legal right”) with Shuman, 78 B.R. at 256 ("A person who technically is not a party to the prior action may be bound by the prior decision only 'if his interests …
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
Tribal courts, moreover, are the “appropriate forums for the exclusive adjudication of disputes affecting important personal and property interest of both Indians and non-Indians.” Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49, 65 , 98 S.Ct. 1670, 1680 , 56 L.Ed.2d 106 (1978) (emphasis added); see A & A Concrete, *1306 Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411 , 1415 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986); Superior Oil Co. v. …
green Deutsch v. Flannery (1987)
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See A & A Concrete v. White Mountain Agache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411 , 1414 (9th Cir.1986).
green Deutsch v. Flannery (1987)
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See A & A Concrete v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411 , 1414 (9th Cir.1986). 9 To the extent that there are no differences in the two complaints, or that the differences obviously lack substantive significance, we agree with the district court.
Cited (see also) · D. Ariz. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Companies v. Crow Tribe of Indians, 471 U.S. 845 , 105 S.Ct. 2447 , 85 L.Ed.2d 818 (1985); see also A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1418 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986).
Cited · Alaska · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1418 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986); R.J.
Cited · D. Nev. · signal: see
See A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1416-1417 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986).
Cited (see also) · D. Or. · signal: see also
See Iowa Mutual Insurance Co. v. LaPlante, 480 U.S. at 15 , 107 S.Ct. at 976 ; Stock West, Inc. v. Confederated Tribes, 873 F.2d at 1228 ; see also A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986); Wellman v. Chevron, 815 F.2d 577 .
Cited · D. Colo. · signal: see
See A & A Concrete v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411 , 1417 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1117 , 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986); Wright, Miller & Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure, Jurisdiction § 4465. 21 .
Cited · D. Idaho · signal: see
See A & A Concrete, Inc. v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 781 F.2d 1411, 1418 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2008 , 90 L.Ed.2d 659 (1986); R.J.