United States v. Wayne Randell Anglian (1986)
green
· 49 citation events
across 13 courts.
Showing the 24 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198620062026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
United States v. Thomas P. Gifford (1996)
See, e.g., Webb, 30 F.3d at 689-90 ; United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 767 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
green
United States v. Frasiel L. Hughey (1989)
See United States v. Duncan, 870 F.2d 1532, 1535 (10th Cir.1989); Berrios, 869 F.2d at 29-31 ; United States v. Pomazi, 851 F.2d 244, 248-49 (9th Cir.1988); Hill, 798 F.2d at 405-07 ; United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 767-68 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
green
United States v. Bill Lewis (1987)
United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 107 S.Ct. 148 (1986).
citations omitted
green
United States v. Deonte Sullins (2013)
United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.1986).
green
United States v. Wilfong (2008)
The value of the defendant’s property loss is not limited to the gain to the defendant, United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 767 (6th Cir.1986), which in this case would be zero. 3 .
green
United States v. Jack M. Stone (1997)
United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 (1986).
green
United States v. Anthony Loscalzo, Andrew Loscalzo, Merry Stumpf, David H. Siegel, and Albert L. Boemo (1994)
United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
green
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,709 United States of America v. Christopher Arutunoff, United States of America v. Ste… (1993)
In other cases involving multiple defendants courts have either apportioned the total loss among the defendants, e.g., U.S. v. Sharp, 927 F.2d 170 , 173 n. 2 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 139 , 116 L.Ed.2d 106 (1991); U.S. v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986), or made the obligation to pay joint and several, e.g., U.S. v. Chaney, 964 F.2d 437 , 454 & n. 52 (5th Cir.1992); U.S. v. Angelica,…
green
United States v. Eugene J. Cahill, Sr. (1990)
Among the factors to be considered are the defendant’s prior experience with the criminal justice system, United States v. Oglesby, 764 F.2d 1273, 1277-78 (7th Cir.1985); United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768-69 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986), and whether the defendant initiated contact with law enforcement officials, Stawicki v. Israel, 778 F.2d 380 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 842 , 107 S.Ct. 150 , 93 L.Ed.2d 9…
In determining such an order, the district court is “vested with wide discretion.” United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.1986) (quoting Williams v. Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 243 , 90 S.Ct. 2018, 2023 , 26 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970)), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
green
United States v. Joseph Orville Youpee (1988)
See, e.g., United States v. Mischler, 787 F.2d 240, 245 (7th Cir.1986) (upholding well-established Seventh Circuit law that "the district judge acts within his authority in assessing restitution in excess of the amount indicated by the court to which the guilty plea was entered,” so long as the amount of loss was accurately determined and the defendant "given ample opportunity to contest the figure”); United States v. McMichael, 699 F.2d 193, 194 (4th Cir.1983) (upholding re…
green
State v. Krochmal (2018)
We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Gulledge, 326 S.C. 220, 228 , 487 S.E.2d 590, 594 (1997) ("The restitution hearing is part of the sentencing proceeding."); State v. Morgan, 417 S.C. 338, 341 , 790 S.E.2d 27, 29 (Ct. App. 2016) ("[A] restitution order is in the nature of a sentence, and the [circuit] court is vested with wide discretion in determining the appropriate sentence for a convicted defendant." (citing United States v…
green
Commonwealth v. Callender (2014)
See United States v. Smith, 687 F.2d 147, 149-50 (6th Cir. 1982); In re Melvin, 546 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 1976) (A prosecutor “may not use his subpoena powers . . . without the participation of the grand juiy”); United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 769 (6th Cir. 1986) (“[W]e indicated in Smith, however, that some involvement of the grand juiy is necessaiy”).
“[W]e indicated in Smith, however, that some involvement of the grand juiy is necessaiy”
green
Dahlman v. United States (In Re Dahlman) (2003)
United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.1986).
green
United States v. Nachamie (2000)
In United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 767 (6th Cir.1986), the district court ordered the defendant to pay $3,162.32, which was one fourth of the unpaid loss.
green
Boyd v. Peoria Journal Star, Inc. (1997)
Russo, 784 F.2d at 765.
green
United States v. Ronald v. Cloud (1989)
See e.g., United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
green
United States v. Johnathan Holt (2018)
See United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 769 (6th Cir. 1986) (rejecting, based in part on the plain words of the subpoena, defendant’s argument that he subjectively believed that the subpoena required him to make a statement).
rejecting, based in part on the plain words of the subpoena, defendant’s argument that he subjectively believed that the subpoena required him to make a statement
See United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.) (noting that district court is "vested with wide discretion" in determining a restitution order), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 (1986).
green
United States v. David M. Weber (1994)
Secs. 3663-64 , "does not dictate how restitution liability should be apportioned among multiple defendants"; however, "a sentencing court has wide discretion to fashion an appropriate sentence for an individual defendant." United States v. Harris, 7 F.3d 1537, 1540 (10th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.) ("A restitution order is in the nature of a sentence, and the district court is 'vested with wide discretion' in determining the ap…
green
United States v. Billy Gene Harris (1993)
See also United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.) (sentencing court must consider *1540 each individual defendant’s financial needs and resources in issuing a restitution order), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
green
United States v. Roy Ryan (1989)
See United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
green
State v. Morgan (2016)
Code Ann. § 17-25-322 (A) (2014) (“[I]n addition to any other sentence which it may impose, the court shall order the defendant make restitution_” (emphasis added)); see also United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765, 769 (6th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986) (a restitution order is in the nature of a sentence, and the district court is vested with wide discretion in determining the appropriate sentence for a convicted defendant).
green
State v. Gulledge (1997)
See S.C.Code Ann. § 17-25-322 (Supp.1996) (“in addition to any other sentence which it may impose, the court shall order the defendant make restitution ... ”); S.C.Code Ann. § 16-3-1530(D)(3) (Supp.1996) (“[t]he judge shall order restitution at every sentencing for a crime against person or property ... unless the court finds a substantial and compelling reason not to order restitution”); S.C.Code Ann. § 17-25-125 (1976); see also United States v. Anglian, 784 F.2d 765 (6th …