How cited: In Re Timbers Of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Go Syfert

In Re Timbers Of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. (1986)

green · 152 citation events across 48 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198620062026
yellow In Re Anderson (1987)
But See · Bankr. D. Utah · signal: but see
American Mariner Industries, Inc., 734 F.2d 426 (9th Cir.1984); But see, In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, 793 F.2d 1380 (5th Cir.1986) aff'd en banc, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs., Ltd.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1387 (5th Cir.1986), on reh’g, 808 F.2d 363 (1987) (en banc court reinstates panel opinion), aff 'd, 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs., Ltd.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1389-1401 (5th Cir.1986) (discussing history of adequate protection provisions), aff'd on reh'g, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1987), aff'd, 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988).
Quote Authority · 1st Cir.
Ass'ns of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs., Ltd. ( In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs., Ltd. ), 793 F.2d 1380 , 1390 (5th Cir. 1986) ("In general, the Fifth Amendment requires only that the value of the secured position of a creditor be maintained during the stay."); Lend Lease v. Briggs Transp.
"In general, the Fifth Amendment requires only that the value of the secured position of a creditor be maintained during the stay."
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1407 (5th Cir.1986).
green In Re: Ganess Maharaj (2012)
Rule Authority · 4th Cir.
Prot., 474 U.S. 494, 501 , 106 S.Ct. 755 , 88 L.Ed.2d 859 (1986) (citing Swarts v. Hammer, 194 U.S. 441, 444 , 24 S.Ct. 695 , 48 L.Ed. 1060 (1904)) (“If Congress wishes to grant the trustee an extraordinary exemption from nonbankruptcy law, the intention would be clearly expressed, not left to be collected or inferred from disputable considerations of convenience in administering the estate of the bankrupt.”); Palmer v. Massachusetts, 308 U.S. 79, 85 , 60 S.Ct. 34 , 84 L.Ed.…
green Garner v. Garner (2011)
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
In re Delta Res., Inc., 54 F.3d 722, 730 (11th Cir.1995) (citing In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs., Ltd., 793 F.2d 1380, 1407 (5th Cir.1986)).
green Rohrbough v. Harris (2008)
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
See Canup v. Chipman-Union, Inc., 123 F.3d 1440,1443 (11th Cir.1997) (“We would expect Congress to speak more clearly if it intended such a radical change in the application and understanding of its ... statutes.”); I n re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs., Ltd., 793 F.2d 1380, 1382 (5th Cir.1986) (“We think it unlikely that Congress would have adopted such a rule— entailing, as it does, major changes in the way in which a reorganization proceeding is conducted — without clea…
Quote Authority · 5th Cir.
Two later letters cited alleged violations of regulations and statutory provisions and indicated that enforcement action would be sought "[i]f you fail to adequately respond." A fourth letter promised enforcement action if Aviall failed to pursue one of two suggested remediation options 3 Crandon v. United States, 494 U.S. 152, 158 , 110 S.Ct. 997, 1001 , 108 L.Ed.2d 132 (1990) ("In determining the meaning of the statute, we look not only to the particular statutory language…
"Each part or section [of a statute] should be construed in connection with every other part or section so as to produce a harmonious whole. Thus it is not proper to confine interpretation to the one section to be construed."
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1385 (5th Cir. 1986), aff'd on reh'g, 808 F.2d 363 (1987) (en banc), aff'd, 484 U.S. 365 (1988); see also Nicholas v. United States, 384 U.S. 678, 683-84 (1966) (stating that the rule "rests at bottom on an awareness of the inequity that would result if, through the continuing accumulation of interest in the course of subsequent bankruptcy proceedings, obligations bearing relatively high rates of interest were permitte…
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1385 (5th Cir.1986), aff'd on reh’g, 808 F.2d 363 (1987) (en banc), aff'd, 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988); see also Nicholas v. United States, 384 U.S. 678, 683-84 , 86 S.Ct. 1674 , 16 L.Ed.2d 853 (1966) (stating that the rule “rests at bottom on an awareness of the inequity that would result if, through the continuing accumulation of interest in the course of subsequent bankruptcy proceedings, ob…
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc., Ltd.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1381, 1407 (5th Cir.1986), on reh'g, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1987 (en banc court reinstating panel opinion)), aff'd, 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc., Ltd.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1381, 1407 (5th Cir.1986), on reh’g, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1987 (en banc court reinstating panel opinion)), aff 'd, 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988).
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
In the course of its opinion the court observed that the solvency exception to the general rule “helps to prevent debtors from abusing the bankruptcy process by merely using it to delay payments and avoid interest penalties.” Id. at 677 . “[Sjecured creditors (and unsecured creditors, as well) might be entitled to postpetition interest if the debtor’s estate ultimately proved to be solvent.” In re Timbers of Inwood Forest, 793 F.2d 1380, 1386 (5th Cir.1986), aff'd on other g…
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Interest payable to the oversecured creditor is discussed in the panel opinion, 793 F.2d at 1386. .
Rule Authority · Bankr. N.D. Ill. · 2 citations in this opinion
In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc., Ltd., 793 F.2d 1380, 1386-87, n. 7 (5th Cir.1986) [aff'd sub nom.
Rule Authority · Bankr. D. Mass. · 2 citations in this opinion
Section 361 of the Bankruptcy Code lists three non-exclusive ways adequate protection may be provided. 2 A recent Fifth Circuit opinion suggests that the method of cash payments outlined in section 361(1) “would seem to be particular *1018 ly appropriate when collateral is depreciating at a steady rate.” In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd., 793 F.2d 1380, 1388 (5th Cir.1986).
green In Re Churchfield (1986)
Rule Authority · Bankr. E.D. Mich. · 2 citations in this opinion
Id. at 1384 (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green Cella III, LLC (2021)
Rule Authority · Bankr. E.D. La.
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc., Ltd.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1381, 1407 (5th Cir. 1986), on reh’g, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir. 1987 (en banc court reinstating panel opinion)), aff’d, 484 U.S. 365 (1988)).
Rule Authority · Bankr. N.D. Miss.
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc., Ltd.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1388 (5th Cir.1986) (vacated, 802 F.2d 777 , reinstated on reh’g en banc, 808 F.2d 363 , 364 (5th Cir.1987), aff'd, 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988)).
Rule Authority · Bankr. D. Mass.
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc., Ltd.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1381, 1407 (5th Cir.1986), on reh’g, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1987 (en banc court reinstating panel opinion)), aff'd, 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988). 116 F.3d at 799 .
Rule Authority · Bankr. E.D. Tex.
Ass’n of Texas v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc., Ltd., (In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc., Ltd.), 793 F.2d 1380,1409 (5th Cir.1986), on reh’g, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc court reinstating panel opinion), aff'd, 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988). 10 See also, Reliant Energy Servs., Inc. v. Enron Canada Corp., 349 F.3d 816, 825 (5th Cir.2003) [“The purposes of the bankruptcy stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362 are to protect the debtor’s assets, provi…
Rule Authority · Bankr. S.D. Miss.
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1385 (5th Cir.1986) (generally, creditors are not allowed to recover interest that accrues on their debts during the pendency of a bankruptcy case); see 11 U.S.C. § 502 (b)(2) (excluding “unmatured” interest from a creditor’s allowed claim).
Rule Authority · Bankr. M.D. Penn.
In In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd., 793 F.2d 1380, 1391 (5th Cir.1986), aff 'd 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988), the Fifth Circuit proclaimed that this passage from Wright II is “the clearest statement of a fifth [sic] amendment right of a secured creditor, namely, to have the value of its secured position maintained throughout the [bankruptcy] proceeding.
Rule Authority · Bankr. E.D. Tex.
In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc., Ltd., 793 F.2d 1380, 1409 (5th Cir.1986). 6 The obligation is strict and the law requires such schedules to be as complete and accurate as possible.
Rule Authority · Bankr. N.D. Tex.
The Fifth Circuit’s analysis, supported by Congressional intent, is that “allowing the accrual of postpetition interest in favor of one creditor would be ‘inequitable’ to other creditors.” In re Cajun Electric Power Co-op., Inc., 185 F.3d 446, 457 (5th Cir.1999) (citing In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs., 793 F.2d 1380, 1385 (5th Cir.1986), aff'd on reh’g, 808 F.2d 363 (1987) (en banc), aff'd, 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988)).
green In Re Nail (1996)
Rule Authority · Bankr. N.D. Ala.
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs., Ltd.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1387 (5th Cir.1986), on reh'g, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc court reinstates panel opinion), aff'd, 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988).
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Richards v. United States, 369 U.S. 1, 11 , 82 S.Ct. 585, 592 , 7 L.Ed.2d 492 (1962); In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd., 793 F.2d 1380, 1384 (5th Cir.1986). 6.
green In Re Foertsch (1994)
Rule Authority · Bankr. D.N.D.
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs., Ltd.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1387 (5th Cir.1986), aff'd on rehearing en banc 808 F.2d 363 (1987), aff'd sub nom.
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd., 793 F.2d 1380, 1383 (5th Cir.1986), panel opinion reinstated, 808 F.2d 363 , 364 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc).
Rule Authority · Bankr. N.D. Tex.
Defendant asserts that the Joint Statement made by House and Senate leaders carries weight equal to that of a conference report, citing In re Timbers of Inwood Forest, 793 F.2d 1380, 1389-99, n. 33 (5th Cir.1986), vacated, 802 F.2d 777 , reinstated on reh'g en banc, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1987), aff'd 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988).
Rule Authority · Bankr. D.N.M.
In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc., Ltd., 793 F.2d 1380, 1386-87, n. 7 (5th Cir.1986).
green In Re Lile (1989)
Rule Authority · Bankr. S.D. Tex.
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1409 (5th Cir.1986), aff'd en banc, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · D. Wyo.
See also In re Southerton Corporation, 46 B.R. 391 (M.D.Pa.1982); In re Timbers of Inwood Forest, 793 F.2d 1380, 1387 (5th Cir.1986), aff'd, 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988).
green Matter of Bradley (1988)
Rule Authority · Bankr. D. Iowa
In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc., Ltd., 793 F.2d 1380, 1387 (5th Cir.1986) aff'd on rehearing en banc 808 F.2d 363 (1987), aff'd sub nom.
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
In re Timber of Inwood Forest, 793 F.2d 1380, 1405 (5th Cir.1986); In re: Abrams Square Associates Limited Partnership, 95 B.R. 51 (N.D.Tex.1988).
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
In re Timber of Inwood Forest, 793 F.2d 1380, 1405 (5th Cir.1986).
green In Re Redick (1987)
Rule Authority · Bankr. E.D. Mich.
“The delay in distribution is the act of the law; it is a necessary incident to the settlement of the estate.” Thomas v. Western Car Co., 149 U.S. 95, 116-117 , 13 S.Ct. 824, 833 , 37 L.Ed. 663 (1893); Vanston Bondholders Protection Committee v. Green, 329 U.S. 156, 163 , 67 S.Ct. 237, 240 , 91 L.Ed. 162 (1946); In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc., 793 F.2d 1380, 1385-1386 (5th Cir.1986), aff'd en banc, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1987), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 2459 ,…
Rule Authority · Bankr. E.D. Pa.
Accord: e.g., In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Inc., 793 F.2d 1380, 1416 (5th Cir.1986), reinstated, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc).
Rule Authority · Bankr. D. Conn.
Applying the “plain meaning rule”, see Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470, 485 , 37 S.Ct. 192, 194 , 61 L.Ed. 442 (1917); In re Timbers of Inwood Forest, 793 F.2d 1380, 1384 (5th Cir.1986) reinstated, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1987), it is apparent that subsections 1129(a)(7) and (b)(2)(A) are intended to provide for the treatment of each class of impaired claims and not to define those claims which are to be afforded such treatment.
Rule Authority · Bankr. E.D. Pa.
Rather, we agree in large part with the result reached by the Fifth Circuit, adopted by the Court en banc, in In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Inc., 793 F.2d 1380, 1416 (5th Cir.1986), reinstated, 808 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc), that such compensation should not always be a factor in determining whether a creditor is adequately protected.
Rule Authority
(In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs.), 793 F.2d 1380, 1385 (5th Cir. 1986), aff’d on reh’g, 808 F.2d 363 (1987) (en banc), aff’d, 484 U.S. 365 (1988); see also Nicholas v. United States, 384 U.S. 678, 683-84 (1966) (stating that the rule “rests at bottom on an awareness of the inequity that would result if, through the continuing accumulation of interest in the course of subsequent bankruptcy proceedings, obligations bearing relatively high rates of interest were permitte…
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See In re Timbers, 793 F.2d at 1396 (ranking text of the enacted bill as most authoritative, followed by post-hearing amendments and committee reports).
ranking text of the enacted bill as most authoritative, followed by post-hearing amendments and committee reports
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See In re Timbers of Inwood Forest, 793 F.2d 1380 , 1398-99 & n. 33 (5th Cir.1986) (discussing Joint Statement’s weight as equivalent to conference committee report), vacated, 802 F.2d 777 , reinstated on reh’g en banc, 808 F.2d 363 , 364 (5th Cir.1987), aff'd, 484 U.S. 365 , 108 S.Ct. 626 , 98 L.Ed.2d 740 (1988); In re Spong, 661 F.2d 6, 10 (2d Cir.1981) (“These remarks, offered in lieu of a conference report by the principal sponsors of the Act, are entitled to great weigh…
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, 793 F.2d 1380, 1384 (5th Cir.1986): NRDC v. EPA, 822 F.2d 104, 113 (D.C.Cir.1987). 369 .
green In re Geijsel (2012)
Cited · Bankr. N.D. Tex. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See In re Timbers, 793 F.2d at 1389 ("adequate protection ... [is] intended to protect a secured creditor against a decrease in the value of its collateral due to the debtor’s use, sale or lease of that collateral during the stay.”) They are not meant to be interest payments, insurance against a plan falling apart, or anything but tangible protections against the depreciation of a creditor's collateral.
"adequate protection ... [is] intended to protect a secured creditor against a decrease in the value of its collateral due to the debtor’s use, sale or lease of that collateral during the stay.”
Cited · Bankr. W.D. Tex. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See In re Timbers of Inwood Forest, 793 F.2d 1380, 1384 (5th Cir.1986).
Cited · Bankr. E.D. Va. · signal: see
See In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd., 793 F.2d 1380, 1387 (5th Cir.1986) aff'd, United Sav.
green In Re Triplett (1988)
Cited · Bankr. W.D. Tex. · signal: see
See In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Assoc’s Ltd., 793 F.2d 1380, 1388 (5th Cir.1986) (the original panel opinion).
Cited · W.D. Ky. · signal: see
See In re Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd., 793 F.2d 1380 (5th Cir.) reh’g en banc granted, 802 F.2d 111 (1986).