State v. Pattillo (2020)
green
· 31 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2021 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
202120232026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Atkins (2025)
State v. Pattillo, 311 Kan. 995 , 1015, 469 P.3d 1250 (2020) ("We hold the invited-error doctrine will generally apply when a party requests the instruction before trial, the error was as obvious before trial as when the judge gave the instruction, and the party did not present to the trial judge the same objection as made on appeal."); see State v. Fleming, 308 Kan. 689 ,707, 423 P.3d 506 (2018) (finding invited error precluded review of claimed jury instruction error under…
"We hold the invited-error doctrine will generally apply when a party requests the instruction before trial, the error was as obvious before trial as when the judge gave the instruction, and the party did not present to the trial judge the same objection as made on appeal."
green
Farmer (ID 78747) v. Schnurr (2022)
To the extent that Farmer may be arguing that the evidence adduced at trial was actually insufficient to convict him of criminal discharge of a firearm at an occupied vehicle—as that 27 Id. at 226 (citations omitted). 28 Id. at 225-26; see State v. Levy, 313 Kan. 232 , 485 P.3d 605, 609 (2021) (“In Kansas, the crime of criminal discharge does not require a specific intent to shoot ‘at a motor vehicle’ as opposed to at some other target.”); State v. Pattillo, 311 Kan. 995 , 4…
discussing Farmer and finding evidence sufficient for a reasonable jury to find the defendant guilty of criminal discharge of a firearm at an occupied dwelling “even if the shooting was motivated by an intent to kill a specific person”
green
State v. Stuart (2024)
See State v. Patillo, 311 Kan. 11 995, Syl. ¶ 5, 469 P.3d 1250 (2020) (under the felony-murder statute, the killing must occur within the res gestae of the underlying crime, and there must be a direct causal connection between the felony and the resulting death).
under the felony-murder statute, the killing must occur within the res gestae of the underlying crime, and there must be a direct causal connection between the felony and the resulting death
green
State v. Sweet (2024)
See State v. Pattillo, 311 Kan. 995 , 1018, 469 P.3d 1250 (2020).
green
Johnson v. Bass Pro Outdoor World (2024)
See State v. Pattillo, 311 Kan. 995 , 1003-04, 469 P.3d 1250 (2020).
green
State v. Vargas (2021)
See, e.g., State v. Pattillo, 311 Kan. 995 , 1000, 469 P.3d 1250 (2020) (discussing felony-murder implications); Schoonover, 281 Kan. at 478-95 (considering, and ultimately rejecting, continued application of the "single act of violence/merger" analysis to evaluate multiplicity).
discussing felony-murder implications
green
State v. Coble (2021)
But we have explained that "when a defendant actively pursues what is later argued to be an error, then the doctrine most certainly applies." State v. Sasser, 305 Kan. 1231 , 1236, 391 P.3d 698 (2017); see also State v. Pattillo, 311 Kan. 995 , 1014, 469 P.3d 1250 12 (2020).