How cited: Raymond C. Ahlberg v. Department of Health and Human Services · Go Syfert

Raymond C. Ahlberg v. Department of Health and Human Services (1986)

green · 42 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 24 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198620062026
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Ahlberg v. Department of Health and Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242-43 (Fed.Cir.1986); Kadin Corp. v. United States, 782 F.2d 175, 176 (Fed.Cir.1986). 13 The Claims Court must be accorded latitude in managing litigation of this size, where originally more than 1100 plaintiffs were involved.
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
“If a party fails to prosecute or defend an appeal, the judge may dismiss the appeal with prejudice or rule in favor of the appellant.” 5 C.F.R. § 1201.43 (b), “Where an appellant’s repeated failure to respond to multiple Board orders reflects a failure to exercise basic due diligence, the imposition of the sanction of dismissal for failure to prosecute has been found appropriate.” Williams v. U.S. Postal Serv., 116 M.S.P.R. 377 , 381 (2011) (citing Ahlberg v. Dep’t of Healt…
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
The regulation explicitly authorized h[er] to dismiss the cases for such failure.” 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.Ch-.1986).
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
Ms. Ball’s case is similar to Ahlberg v. Department of Health and Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.Cir.1986) wherein this court stated: The presiding official correctly treated the Ahlberg petitioners’ failure to make any submission, after twice being told to do so, as a failure to prosecute their appeal, as he had warned them he would do.
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
Sec. 1201.43(b); Ahlberg v. Dep't of Health & Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 913 (1987).
Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.
Ahlberg v. Department of Health and Human Servs., 804 F.2d 1238, 1245 (Fed.Cir. 1986), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 3183 , 96 L.Ed.2d 672 (1987); Pettis, 803 F.2d at 1179 ; Menoken, 784 F.2d at 369-70 ; Certain Former CSA Employees, 762 F.2d at 985 .
Rule Authority · MSPB · 2 citations in this opinion
Ahlberg v. Department of Health and Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.
Rule Authority · MSPB
Davis v. Department of Commerce, 120 M.S.P.R. 34 , ¶ 17 (2013); Williams v. U.S. Postal Service, 116 M.S.P.R. 377 , ¶ 7 (2011) (citing Ahlberg v. Department of Health and Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.
Rule Authority · MSPB
Davis v. Department of Commerce, 120 M.S.P.R. 34 , ¶ 17 (2013); Williams v. U.S. Postal Service, 116 M.S.P.R. 377 , ¶ 7 (2011) (citing Ahlberg v. Department of Health and Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.
Rule Authority · MSPB
Ahlberg v. Department of Health and Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.
Rule Authority · MSPB
Cir. 2012) (nonprecedential); 9 Ahlberg v. Department of Health & Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.
Rule Authority · MSPB
Cir. 2012) (nonprecedential); 9 Ahlberg v. Department of Health & Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.
Rule Authority · MSPB
Williams v. U.S. Postal Service, 116 M.S.P.R. 377 , ¶7 (2011) (citing Ahlberg v. Department of Health & Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.
Rule Authority · MSPB
Williams v. U.S. Postal Service, 116 M.S.P.R. 377 , ¶7 (2011) (citing Ahlberg v. Department of Health & Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.
Cited · Fed. Cir. · signal: see
See Ahlberg, 804 F.2d at 1243 .
Cited · Fed. Cir. · signal: see
See Ahlberg v. Dep’t of Health and Human Servs., 804 F.2d 1238, 1242-43 (Fed.Cir.1986).
Cited · Fed. Cir. · signal: see
See Ahlberg v. Dep’t of Health and Human Servs., 804 F.2d 1238, 1242-43 (Fed.Cir.1986) (finding the presiding official correctly dismissed an appeal for failure to prosecute after petitioners failed to make any submission after two warnings).
Cited · Fed. Cir. · signal: see
See Ahlberg v. Dep’t of Health and Human Servs., 804 F.2d 1238, 1242-43 (Fed.Cir.1986).
Cited · Fed. Cir. · signal: see
See Ahlberg v. Dep’t of Health and Human Servs., 804 F.2d 1238, 1242-43 (Fed.Cir.1986).
Cited · Fed. Cir. · signal: see
See Ahlberg v. Department of Health & Human Servs., 804 F.2d 1238, 1242-43 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 913 (1987); Murdock v. Government Printing Office, 38 M.S.P.R. 297 , 299 (1988).
Cited · MSPB · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
Leseman v. Department of the Army, 122 M.S.P.R. 139 , ¶ 6 (2015); Chandler v. Department of the Navy, 87 M.S.P.R. 369 , ¶ 6 (2000); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.43 (b); see Ahlberg v. Department of Health & Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.
Cited · MSPB · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
Leseman v. Department of the Army, 122 M.S.P.R. 139 , ¶ 6 (2015); Chandler v. Department of the Navy, 87 M.S.P.R. 369 , ¶ 6 (2000); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.43 (b); see Ahlberg v. Department of Health & Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.
Cited · MSPB · signal: see
See Ahlberg v. Department of Health & Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.
presiding official justifiably and properly dismissed an appeal for failure to prosecute based on the appellants’ failure to make any submission in response to two orders directing them to clarify their claims
Cited (see also) · MSPB · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Ahlberg v. Department of Health & Human Services, 804 F.2d 1238, 1242 (Fed.
affirming dismissal with prejudice as a sanction for failure to prosecute when appellants failed to respond to multiple orders in a reduction in force appeal