How cited: Kirksey v. Heckler · Go Syfert

Kirksey v. Heckler (1987)

green · 17 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green Neely v. Shalala (1993)
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
P, App. 2 § 200.00(e)(2); Kirksey v. Heckler, 808 F.2d 690, 692-94 (8th Cir.1987); see also Stewart, 957 F.2d at 586 .
green Neely v. Shalala (1993)
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
P, App. 2 § 200.00(e)(2); Kirksey v. Heckler, 808 F.2d 690, 692-94 (8th Cir.1987); see also Stewart, 957 F.2d at 586 .
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
P, App. 2 § 200.00(e)(2); Kirksey v. Heckler, 808 F.2d 690, 692-94 (8th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Relying on Kirksey v. Heckler, 808 F.2d 690, 692-93 (8th Cir.1987), the Secretary urges this court, however, to affirm the AU’s decision if there is evidence on the record as a whole to demonstrate that there is other gainful work in the national economy that is available to him.
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. · signal: cf.
See, e.g., Sebion v. Heckler, 757 F.2d 960, 961 (8th Cir.1985) (per curiam); cf. Kirksey v. Heckler, 808 F.2d 690, 692-93 (8th Cir.1987) (setting forth additional procedural requirements when claimant has established his inability to perform his past work).
green Gavin v. Heckler (1987)
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
See O'Leary v. Schweiker, 710 F.2d 1334, 1338 (8th Cir.1983); Lancellotta v. Secretary, 806 F.2d 284, 285, 287 (1st Cir.1986). 29 Although Gavin cannot return to his former work, "it is better that the Secretary be allowed to explore other evidentiary means to establish what jobs exist that [Gavin] might still pursue." Kirksey v. Heckler, 808 F.2d 690, 694 (8th Cir.1987).
green Gavin v. Heckler (1987)
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Although Gavin cannot return to his former work, “it is better that the Secretary be allowed to explore other evidentiary means to establish what jobs exist that [Gavin] might still pursue.” Kirksey v. Heckler, 808 F.2d 690, 694 (8th Cir.1987).
green Davis v. Callahan (1997)
Rule Authority · S.D. Iowa
“This”, the Court wrote, “is in clear violation of our repeated directive in these cases.” In Kirksey v. Heckler, 808 F.2d 690, 692 (8th Cir.1987), the court held that the ALJ and the Secretary, having found Kirksey was incapable of performing his past relevant work, had failed to follow the law “now well established in this circuit” of proving the existence *920 of jobs that “Kirksey is capable of performing given the nature of his impairment”.
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Kirksey v. Heckler, 808 F.2d 690, 692-93 (8th Cir.1987); McCoy v. Schweiker, 683 F.2d 1138, 1148 (8th Cir.1982) (en banc).
green Sesker v. Sullivan (1991)
Cited · W.D. Mo. · signal: see
See Kirksey v. Heckler, 808 F.2d 690, 692-98 (1987).
green Jones v. Sullivan (1991)
Cited · W.D. Mo. · signal: see
See Kirksey v. Heckler, 808 F.2d 690, 692 (8th Cir.1987); Coenen, Constitutional Case Against Intracircuit Nonacquiescence, 75 Minn.L.Rev. 1339 (1991); Estreicher & Revesz, Non-Acquiescence by Federal Administrative Agencies, 98 Yale L.J. 679 (1989).