How cited: Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines · Go Syfert

Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines (1987)

green · 1,080 citation events across 24 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198720062026
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 7 citations in this opinion
Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 905-06 (9th Cir. 1987).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 6 citations in this opinion
First, the defendant can “rebut an allegation of conspiracy by showing a plausible and justifiable reason for its conduct that is consistent with proper business practice.” Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987); accord City of Long Beach, 872 F.2d at 1406 ; Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, 815 F.2d 522, 526-28 (9th Cir.1987); T.W.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 6 citations in this opinion
First, the defendant can "rebut an allegation of conspiracy by showing a plausible and justifiable reason for its conduct that is consistent with proper business practice." Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines , 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir. 1987); accord City of Long Beach , 872 F.2d at 1406 ; Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon , 815 F.2d 522, 526-28 (9th Cir. 1987); T.W.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987).
Quote Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Pennington, 381 U.S. at 669 , 85 S.Ct. at 1592 ("the alleged agreement between UMW and the large operators ..., if proved, was not exempt from the antitrust laws"); Richards, 810 F.2d at 902 ("[f]ailure on the part of the plaintiff to produce evidence from which a jury could infer reasonably that conduct was conspiratorial, not unilateral, will lead to summary judgment for the defendant"); Bodine Produce, 494 F.2d at 561 (plaintiff must specifically allege non-labor grou…
"[f]ailure on the part of the plaintiff to produce evidence from which a jury could infer reasonably that conduct was conspiratorial, not unilateral, will lead to summary judgment for the defendant"
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
A defendant can “rebut an allegation of conspiracy by showing a plausible and justifiable reason for its conduct that is consistent with proper business practice.” Id. (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · N.D. Cal. · 2 citations in this opinion
First, defendants may “rebut an allegation of conspiracy by showing a plausible and justifiable reason for its conduct that is consistent with proper business practice.” In re Citric Acid Litigation, 191 F.3d at 1094 (citing Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Haw. · 2 citations in this opinion
Where the claim appears to be implausible, the plaintiff “must come forward with more persuasive evidence to support [its] claim than would otherwise be necessary.” Id., Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
Defs.’ Mem. at 16-17 (citing In re Citric Acid Litig., 191 F.3d 1090, 1094 (9th Cir. 1999) (describing the inquiry as (1) whether the defendant can “rebut an allegation of conspiracy by showing a plausible and justifiable reason for its conduct that is consistent with proper business practice” and (2) whether plaintiff can provide “specific evidence tending to show that the defendant was not engaging in permissible competitive behavior” (first passage quoting Richards v. Nei…
Rule Authority · W.D. Wash.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir. 1991) (quoting 21 Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir. 1987)). 22 1 B.
Rule Authority · W.D. Wash.
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986); 13 Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir. 1987).
Rule Authority · W.D. Wash.
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986); 20 Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir. 1987).
Rule Authority · S.D. Cal.
At step one, “the 17 || defendant(s] can ‘rebut an allegation of conspiracy by showing a plausible and justifiable 18 ||reason for its conduct that is consistent with proper business practice.’” Jd. at 1094 19 || (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir. 1987)).
Rule Authority · S.D. Cal.
At step one, “the 17 || defendant(s] can ‘rebut an allegation of conspiracy by showing a plausible and justifiable 18 ||reason for its conduct that is consistent with proper business practice.’” Jd. at 1094 19 || (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir. 1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir. 1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir. 1987)).
green Gray v. Seterus, Inc. (2017)
Rule Authority · D. Or.
On a motion for summary judgment, “the moving party bears the initial burden to show the absence of a material and triable issue of fact; the burden then moves to the opposing party, who must present significant probative evidence tending to support its claim or defense.” Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir. 1987).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)). *1086 Deference to the non-moving party has limits.
green Baez v. United States (2010)
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir. 1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir. 1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
green Romero v. Vargo (2009)
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir. 1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · C.D. Cal.
First, the defendant can “rebut an allegation of conspiracy by showing a plausible and justifiable reason for its conduct that is consistent with proper business practice.” Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
green Rocha v. United States (2002)
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
green Rocha v. United States (2001)
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Mont.
See, Matsushita, 475 U.S. at 596-98 , 106 S.Ct. 1348 (1986); Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · D. Or.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Haw.
The movant must be able to show “the absence of a material and triable issue of fact,” Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987), although it need not necessarily advance affidavits or similar materials to negate the existence of an issue on which the nonmoving party will bear the burden of proof at trial.
Rule Authority · D. Nev.
The movant must be able to show “the absence of a material and triable issue of fact,” Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987), although it need not necessarily advance affidavits or similar materials to negate the existence of an issue on which the nonmoving party will bear the burden of proof at trial.
Rule Authority · D. Haw.
The movant must be able to show “the absence of a material and triable issue of fact,” Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987), although it need not necessarily advance affidavits or similar materials to negate the existence of an issue on which the nonmoving party will bear the burden of proof at trial.
Rule Authority · D. Haw.
The movant must be able to show “the absence of a material and triable issue of fact,” Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987), although it need not necessarily advance affidavits or similar materials to negate the existence of an issue on which the nonmoving party will bear the burden of proof at trial.
Rule Authority · D. Ariz.
The movant must be able to show “the absence of a material and triable issue of fact,” Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987), although it need not necessarily advance affidavits or similar materials to negate the existence of an issue on which the nonmoving party will bear the burden of proof at trial.
green United States v. Bell (1998)
Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.
Co., 952 F.2d 1551, 1558 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987)).
Rule Authority · D. Ariz.
The movant must be able to show “the absence of a material and triable issue of fact,” Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987), although it need not necessarily advance affidavits or similar materials to negate the existence of an issue on which the nonmoving party will bear the burden of proof at trial.
Rule Authority · Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Contractors Ass’n, 809 F.2d 626 , 630 (9th Cir.1987); and Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th cir.1987); see also Wilson v. City of Zanesville, 954 F.2d 349, 351 (6th Cir.1992).
Rule Authority · D. Haw.
The movant must be able to show “the absence of a material and triable issue of fact,” Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines, 810 F.2d 898, 902 (9th Cir.1987), although it need not necessarily advance affidavits or similar materials to negate the existence of an issue on which the nonmoving party will bear the burden of proof at trial.