People v. Kyles (2020)
green
· 43 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2020 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
202020232026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
People v. Gilliland (2025)
Accordingly, the trial court’s handling of defendant’s claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel was not error, and defendant’s argument to the contrary lacks merit. ¶ 29 Defendant analogizes this case to People v. Kyles, 2020 IL App (2d) 180087, ¶¶ 1, 16 , a case in which the defendant’s trial attorney voluntarily withdrew during a Krankel hearing.
green
People v. Maury (2025)
In support, defendant cites (1) People v. Downs, 2017 IL App (2d) 121156-C, ¶ 50 (requiring Krankel counsel to “to present any nonfrivolous claim to the trial court even where there remains a possibility or even likelihood that the defendant will not prevail on the claim”) and (2) People v. Kyles, 2020 IL App (2d) 180087, ¶ 46 (When “it is not clear from the record whether counsel fulfilled her duty to independently evaluate defendant’s pro se claims, we must conclude that c…
green
People v. Kyles (2024)
See Kyles, 2020 IL App (2d) 180087 .
green
People v. Majahadeen (2025)
Thus, where the appointment of new counsel for a defendant does not result in any further litigation of the defendant’s pro se ineffective-assistance claim, “it cannot be said that that appointment satisfied the requirements of Krankel and its progeny.” Roberson, 2021 IL App (3d) 190212, ¶ 21 ; see People v. Kyles, 2020 IL App (2d) 180087, ¶ 36 (explaining that “if the defendant has made a sufficient pro se claim of ineffective assistance and request for new counsel, the gen…
green
People v. Peoples (2025)
See People v. Maxwell, 2013 IL App (4th) 111042, ¶ 13 (under Rule 604(d), defendant is entitled to a hearing on a motion to withdraw a guilty plea). ¶ 74 We find support for our determination in People v. Kyles, 2020 IL App (2d) 180087 , and People v. Buchanan, 2013 IL App (2d) 120447 .
green
People v. Palomera (2022)
Id.; see People v. Kyles, 2020 IL App (2d) 180087, ¶ 36 (following Reed and holding that the general appointment of new counsel does not eliminate the trial court’s obligation to make a preliminary inquiry into the merits of a defendant’s pro se claims of ineffective assistance); see also People v. Roberson, 2021 IL App (3d) 190212, ¶ 21 (appointment of new counsel did not satisfy requirements of Krankel where there was no further litigation of the defendant’s claims of inef…