How cited: State v. Lichtenwalter · Go Syfert

State v. Lichtenwalter (2021)

green · 33 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2021 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
202120232026
green State v. Biggs (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
State v. Lichtenwalter, 2021-Ohio-1394, ¶45 (5th Dist.).
green State v. Beatty (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
“Ohio’s speedy trial statutes codify the constitutional guarantee of a speedy trial.” State v. Lichtenwalter, 2021-Ohio-1394, ¶ 35 (5th Dist.); R.C. 2945.71, et seq.
green State v. Newlon (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
General conclusory allegations to the effect that a defendant has been denied effective assistance of counsel are inadequate as a matter of law to impose an evidentiary hearing.” State v. Lichtenwalter, 2021-Ohio-1394, ¶ 42 (5th Dist.), citing State v. Jackson, 64 Ohio St.2d 107, 111 (1980). {¶9} Thus, a petitioner bears the initial burden to “submit evidentiary documents containing sufficient operative facts to demonstrate * * * “ “that [constitutional] errors did occur and…
green State v. Evans (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
See also State v. Phelps, 2022-Ohio-3025, ¶ 35 (5th Dist.); State v. Carroll, 2021-Ohio-3937, ¶ 11 (5th Dist.), appeal not allowed, 2022-Ohio-554 , citing Village of Montpelier v. Greeno, 25 Ohio St.3d 170, 172 , 495 N.E.2d 581 (1986); State v. Lichtenwalter, 2021-Ohio-1394, ¶ 34 (5th Dist.). {¶20} There is no dispute that Appellant entered a guilty plea to the Indictment and received a sentence as recommended by the State.
green State v. Hogya (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
Guernsey Nos. 20CA000013 and 20CA000023, 2021-Ohio-1394, ¶ 32 (“even though the appellant was not provided a timely preliminary hearing, he was subsequently indicted by a grand jury following a bind over and convicted”); State v. Washington, 30 Ohio App.3d 98, 99 , 506 N.E.2d 1203 (8th Dist.1986) (“the general rule is that a subsequent indictment by the grand jury renders any defects in the preliminary hearing moot”).