How cited: United States v. Paul Puzzanghera, A/K/A Paul Corvo, A/K/A Paul Gera · Go Syfert

United States v. Paul Puzzanghera, A/K/A Paul Corvo, A/K/A Paul Gera (1987)

green · 65 citation events across 20 courts. Showing the 28 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198720062026
Rule Authority · SCOTUS · 2 citations in this opinion
United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F. 2d 25, 26 (CA1), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 900 (1987).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
A corollary to this consideration is that the defendant who flees during the pendency of an appeal has “arrogated to himself the right not to respond to an unfavorable decision.” See United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 27 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 237 , 98 L.Ed.2d 195 (1987).
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
See, e.g., McKane v. Durston, 153 U.S. 684, 687 , 14 S.Ct. 913 , 38 L.Ed. 867 (1894); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26-27 (1st Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
See, e.g., McKane v. Durston, 153 U.S. 684, 687 (1894); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26-27 (1st Cir. 1987).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
See, e.g., United States v. Hanzlicek, 187 F.3d 1219, 1220 (10th Cir.1999); United States v. Lanier, 123 F.3d 945, 946 (6th Cir.1997); United States v. Corporan-Cuevas, 35 F.3d 953, 957 (4th Cir.1994); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 27 (1st Cir.1987); United States v. Freelove, 816 F.2d 479, 480 (9th Cir.1987); Virgin Islands v. James, 621 F.2d 588, 589 (3rd Cir.1980); United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323 , 1345 n. 33 (2nd Cir.1974); see also United States v.…
green Walsh v. Walsh (2000)
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
See, e.g., Estelle v. Dorrough, 420 U.S. 534, 539 , 95 S.Ct. 1173 , 43 L.Ed.2d 377 (1975) (upholding the constitutionality of a Texas statute that provided for automatic appellate dismissal when a defendant escapes during the pendency of the appeal, unless the fugitive returns voluntarily within ten days); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 27 (1st Cir.1987) (holding that a fugitive who escaped while the appeal of his conviction was pending and was involuntarily retu…
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
See Ortega-Rodrigues v. United States, 507 U.S. 234, 238 , 113 S.Ct. 1199, 1203 , 122 L.Ed.2d 581 (1993); Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365, 365-36 , 90 S.Ct. 498, 498-99 , 24 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970) (per curiam); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26 (1st Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
See Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States, 113 S. Ct. 1199 , ___ ________________ _____________ 1203 (1993); Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365, 365-66 (1970) ________ __________ (per curiam); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26 (1st ___ ______ _____________ ___________ Cir. 1987).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
See United States v. DeValle, 894 F.2d 133, 136 (5th Cir.1990) (appeal of conviction dismissed based upon fugitive status for approximately eight months); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26 (1st Cir.) (absence of thirty days deemed "minimally sufficient"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 900 , 108 S.Ct. 237 , 98 L.Ed.2d 195 (1987); United States v. Holmes, 680 F.2d 1372, 1373 (11th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (appeal dismissed where defendant absconded for two years before his …
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
We agree with the district court that, due to Dziurgot’s four-year flight from custody, his appeal would have been subject to dismissal in any event under United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 900 , 108 S.Ct. 237 , 98 L.Ed.2d 195 (1987).
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
In the unlikely event that this deprivation denied Union Oil due process of law (or some other procedural right) — despite the principle that there is no constitutional right to an appeal, even in a criminal case, see, e.g., Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 751 , 103 S.Ct. 3308, 3312 , 77 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983); Ortwein v. Schwab, 410 U.S. 656 , 93 S.Ct. 1172 , 35 L.Ed.2d 572 (1973) (per curiam); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26 (1st Cir.1987), and despite Union Oil’s…
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
In the unlikely event that this deprivation denied Union Oil due process of law (or some other procedural right)--despite the principle that there is no constitutional right to an appeal, even in a criminal case, see, e.g., Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 751 , 103 S.Ct. 3308, 3312 , 77 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983); Ortwein v. Schwab, 410 U.S. 656 , 93 S.Ct. 1172 , 35 L.Ed.2d 572 (1973) (per curiam); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26 (1st Cir.1987), and despite Union Oil's …
green State v. Estrada (1995)
Rule Authority · Wash. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
The court in United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 900 (1987), observed that escape, pursuit, and recapture put the government and the taxpayers to considerable expense, and, in addition, "[i]n escaping, appellant has demonstrated his contempt for the judicial system of which the appellate court is one part”.
green State v. Bailon Wences (2017)
Rule Authority · Wash.
Ed. 2d 581 (1993); United States v. Sudthisa-Ard, 17 F.3d 1205, 1206-08 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v. Persico, 853 F.2d 134, 138 (2d Cir. 1988); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 27 (1st Cir. 1987); State v. Brabham, 301 Conn. 376, 377 , 21 A.3d 800 (2011); Hires v. State, 2002-CT-00059-SCT, 882 So. 2d 225 , ; 227-28 (Miss. 2004); State v. Bell, 2000 ND 58 , 608 N.W.2d 232, 235-36 ; State v. Troupe, 891 S.W.2d 808, 811 (Mo. 1995); State v. Patten, 134 N.H. 319, …
green State v. Bailon Wences (2017)
Rule Authority · Wash.
Ed. 2d 581 (1993); United States v. Sudthisa-Ard, 17 F.3d 1205, 1206-08 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v. Persico, 853 F.2d 134, 138 (2d Cir. 1988); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 27 (1st Cir. 1987); State v. Brabham, 301 Conn. 376, 377 , 21 A.3d 800 (2011); Hires v. State, 2002-CT-00059-SCT, 882 So. 2d 225 , ; 227-28 (Miss. 2004); State v. Bell, 2000 ND 58 , 608 N.W.2d 232, 235-36 ; State v. Troupe, 891 S.W.2d 808, 811 (Mo. 1995); State v. Patten, 134 N.H. 319, …
Quote Authority · prsupreme
U.S. v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26 (1er Cir. 1987) (“there [can] be no question that this court, in its discretion, could and normally would dismiss the appeal”); U.S. v. Zedner, 555 F.3d 68, 79 (2do Cir. 2008) (“we have discretion to dismiss the appeal either with prejudice or without prejudice to reinstatement if the defendant returns to custody within a certain time”); U.S. v. Wright, 902 F.2d 241, 242 (3er Cir. 1990) (“It is without question that we have the discretion…
“there [can] be no question that this court, in its discretion, could and normally would dismiss the appeal”
Rule Authority · D. Me.
Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 18 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956), reh’g denied, 351 U.S. 958 , 76 S.Ct. 844 , 100 L.Ed. 1480 (1956)(“It is true that a State is not required by the Federal Constitution to provide appellate courts or a right to appellate review at all.”); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 900 , 108 S.Ct. 237 , 98 L.Ed.2d 195 (1987)(“It is well established that there is no constitutional right to appe…
green State v. Bell (2000)
Rule Authority · N.D.
United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26-27 (1st Cir.1987).
green Matter of SH (1990)
Rule Authority · D.C.
See also, e.g., United States v. Parrish, ___ U.S.App.D.C. ___, ___, 887 F.2d 1107, 1107 (1989) (per curiam); United States v. Persico, 853 F.2d 134, 136 (2d Cir.1988); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 900 , 108 S.Ct. 237 , 98 L.Ed.2d 195 (1987); Young v. State, 518 So.2d 822, 824 (Ala.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 93 , 102 L.Ed.2d 69 (1988); Mason v. State, 440 N.E.2d 457, 458 (Ind.1982); Commonwealth v…
green In re S.H. (1990)
Rule Authority · D.C.
See also, e.g., United States v. Parrish, — U.S.App.D.C. —, —, 887 F.2d 1107, 1107 (1989) (per curiam); United States v. Persico, 853 F.2d 134, 136 (2d Cir.1988); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 900 , 108 S.Ct. 237 , 98 L.Ed.2d 195 (1987); Young v. State, 518 So.2d 822, 824 (Ala.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 93 , 102 L.Ed.2d 69 (1988); Mason v. State, 440 N.E.2d 457, 458 (Ind.1982); Commonwealth v. Hurley, …
Rule Authority · D. Mass.
The so-called “fugitive dis-entitlement doctrine,” as espoused in Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365 , 90 S.Ct. 498 , 24 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970) (per curiam) (appeal of criminal defendant who fled after conviction should be dismissed); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26 (1st Cir.), cert denied, 484 U.S. 900 , 108 S.Ct. 237 , 98 L.Ed.2d 195 (1987) (same); United States ex rel.
green Gurican v. State (1989)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
See, e.g., United States v. London, 723 F.2d 1538, 1539 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2684 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984); United States v. Holmes, 680 F.2d 1372 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1015 , 103 S.Ct. 1259 , 75 L.Ed.2d 486 (1983); United States v. Persico, 853 F.2d 134 (2d Cir.1988); United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 27 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 900 , 108 S.Ct. 237 , 98 L.Ed.2d 195 (1987).
green State v. Kearns (1987)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Hence, having disen-titled himself to appellate review by his conduct, “it can be argued that there is no good reason why recapture should restore the status quo ante.” Id. at 26.
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: compare
Compare United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26-27 (1st Cir.) (dismissing appeal where appellant fled after sentencing but was subsequently recaptured), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 900 , 108 S.Ct. 237 , 98 L.Ed.2d 195 (1987) with United States v. Anagnos, 853 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1988) (hearing appeal where appellant escaped after verdict but prior to sentencing and was later recaptured).
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 27 (1st Cir.1987); United States v. Gordon, 538 F.2d 914, 915 (1st Cir.1976).
green State v. Patten (1991)
Cited · N.H. · signal: see
See United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 900 (1987); United States v. Tremont, 438 F.2d 1202, 1203 (1st Cir. 1971). “[A]n appellate court’s right to dismiss the appeal of an escapee still at large is clear....” Puzzanghera. supra. As the United States Supreme Court has held, “No persuasive reason exists why this Court should proceed to adjudicate the merits of a criminal case after the con victed defendant who has sought review esc…
green State v. Byrd (1989)
Cited (see also) · Iowa · signal: see also
Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365, 366 , 90 S.Ct. 498, 498 , 24 L.Ed.2d 586, 587-88 (1970); see United States v. Wood, 550 F.2d 435, 437-38 (9th Cir.1976); United States v. Gordon, 538 F.2d 914, 915 (1st Cir.1976); State v. Bono, 103 Wis.2d 654, 655 , 309 N.W.2d 400, 400 (1981); see also United States v. Puzzanghera, 820 F.2d 25, 26-27 (1st Cir.1987) (fugitive appellant returned involuntarily to jurisdiction forfeits right of appeal although rights of others similarly sit…
green State v. Wright (1988)
Cited · Mo. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Puz-zanghera, supra, 820 F.2d at 26 .