How cited: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ocean City Police Department · Go Syfert

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ocean City Police Department (1987)

green · 30 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198720062026
Rule Authority · 7th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See also EEOC v. Shell Oil Co., 466 U.S. 54, 64-65 , 104 S.Ct. 1621 , 80 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984); FTC v. Miller, 549 F.2d 452, 460-61 (7th Cir.1977); FTC v. Ken Roberts Co., 276 F.3d 583, 586-87 (D.C.Cir.2001); EEOC v. Karuk Tribe Housing Authority, 260 F.3d 1071, 1076-77 (9th Cir.2001); EEOC v. Ocean City Police Dept., 820 F.2d 1378, 1380 (4th Cir.1987) (en banc), vacated on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1019 , 108 S.Ct. 1990 , 100 L.Ed.2d 223 (1988).
Rule Authority · 7th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
O.C. v. Ocean City Police Department, 820 F.2d 1378, 1383 (4th Cir.1987) (en banc).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Auth., 260 F.3d 1071, 1073 (9th Cir.2001); Reich v. Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Comm’n, 4 F.3d 490, 491-92 (7th Cir.1993); EEOC v. Cherokee Nation, 871 F.2d 937 , 938 & n. 1 (10th Cir.1989); United States v. Frontier Airlines, Inc., 563 F.2d 1008, 1009 (10th Cir.1977), or where it was facially obvious that the subpoena recipient was wholly outside the coverage of the relevant statutory regime, see EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, 315 F.3d 696, 700 (7th Cir.2002); E…
Rule Authority · 4th Cir.
Rather, we held only that if “there are no facts in dispute relating to the untimeliness of the charge,” if the charge “shows on its face that it is untimely,” and “if the filing of the charge is concededly out of time or ... such is otherwise apparent,” then “enforcement of a subpoena based on that charge should be denied.” Id. at 1381, 1380 , and 1383 n. 9 (emphasis added).
Rule Authority · W.D.N.C. · 2 citations in this opinion
See EEOC v. Shell Oil Co., 466 U.S. 54 , 104 S.Ct. 1621 , 80 L.Ed.2d 41 (1983); Ocean City Police Dept., 820 F.2d at 1382 (holding that district court must deny enforcement of subpoena issued by EEOC if the underlying charge shows on its face that it is untimely).
holding that district court must deny enforcement of subpoena issued by EEOC if the underlying charge shows on its face that it is untimely
Rule Authority · D. Maryland
On October 9, 1987, this Court issued a Show Cause Order with regard to which Roadway and, thereafter, the EEOC have filed submissions in timely fashion. “[I]n a proceeding to enforce a subpoena by the EEOC, the district court should review the underlying charge and deny enforcement if the charge shows on its face that it is untimely.” EEOC v. Ocean City Police Dep't, 820 F.2d 1378, 1382 (4th Cir.1987) (en banc), cert. pending, 56 U.S.L.W. 3249 (Oct. 6, 1987) (footnote omitt…
footnote omitted
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See E.E.O.C. v. Ocean City Police Department, 820 F.2d 1378 (4th Cir.1987) (en banc) (quashing subpoena relating to Title VII charge because the charge was untimely), vacated on other grounds, 486 U.S. 1019 , 108 S.Ct. 1990 , 100 L.Ed.2d 223 (1988); E.E.OC. v. Group Health Plan, 212 F.Supp.2d 1094 (E.D.Mo. 2002) (quashing subpoena because the charge against the employer did not involve practices covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act).
Cited · 4th Cir. · signal: see
See Ocean City Police Dept., 820 F.2d at 1379 .
Cited (see also) · D. Minnesota · signal: see also
See also EEOC v. City of Norfolk Police Department, 45 F.3d 80, 83 (4th Cir.1995) (rejecting claim by defendant that “a timely filed charge” is “a prerequisite to EEOC investigative jurisdiction,” and finding that “only that if ‘there are no facts in dispute relating to the untimeliness of the charge,’ if the charge ‘shows on its face that it is untimely,’ and ‘if the filing of the charge is concededly out of time or ... such is otherwise apparent, ’ ” then “enforcement of a…